Source code of conduct rough draft

[stomps]

So it seems after reading this thread

Improving the "Steroid Underground" subforum - rules discussion

That the members should set the standards for the way sources behave and operate.

After all the events of this past week I feel we should get the ball rolling so no one else can get hurt or scammed/shitty gear.
This should be a rough draft and hopefully we can put together a final draft and see if Millard will make it a sticky.

 

[stomps]

#1 pics of operation I know some are opposed to this but I think it should be done

 

[Spyder]

Email encryption period and no gmail, safe-mail, etc...

 

[stomps]

#3
Full disclosure. Who is there rep even though i doubt they will admit to schills who was comped free shit.

Edit: on second thought no more free gear

 

[luckyduck]

Stomps great thread. You keep surprising me.

What other boards they are on. There filtration process. No more vets bringing them into meso. Example Kane.

source has too prove all of these things before they giving members freebies and logs.

If a vet is a rep for a source they need to make that public.

 

[stomps]

Stomps great thread. You keep surprising me.

What other boards they are on. There filtration process. No more vets bringing them into meso. Example Kane.

source has too prove all of these things before they giving members freebies and logs.

If a vet is a rep for a source they need to make that public.

Just want meso to stay the best board around with the members safety and concerns put before sources
Agreed but the last one I think is the hardest to enforce

 

[luckyduck]

Agreed the last one you can't enforce. That was a bit of a poke at a vet here who was a rep. I hope he will come out. I hope all of us can stay on track on this thread and not talk about the superbowl.

 

[stomps]

Agreed the last one you can't enforce. That was a bit of a poke at a vet here who was a rep. I hope he will come out. I hope all of us can stay on track on this thread and not talk about the superbowl.

Yeah I figured it was I poke I'm pretty sure I know of what you speak

 

[stomps]

Once we get this all this figured out someone that is better with the written word should write the final

 

[TheGuy85]

Would be nice to see sources with "established" credibility from other sites advertise here. Nobody knows who these new labs are and they have no track record. Probably the same people popping up over and over again. Sources should be shot down and looked upon suspiciously unless they come on here with some type of references. Too many new labs popping up, handing out free gear to a couple guys, and baiting in everyone else. I wonder what drives these UGLs to select certain people any way, what does some guy pop up and PM some people asking if they want to test their shit and leave a review? A lot of questions that can't be answered.

 

[stomps]

#1 pics of operation I know some are opposed to this but I think it should be done

Email encryption period and no gmail, safe-mail, etc...

#3
Full disclosure. Who is there rep even though i doubt they will admit to schills who was comped free shit.

Edit: on second thought no more free gear

Stomps great thread. You keep surprising me.

What other boards they are on. There filtration process. No more vets bringing them into meso. Example Kane.

source has too prove all of these things before they giving members freebies and logs.

If a vet is a rep for a source they need to make that public.

Ok so this is what we got so far.
Anything else.

 

[Candyskull]

I'd like to see a source limited to being able to start only one thread.

Members can obviously create a separate thread IF NEEDED, but I don't need a source starting 57 threads.

Maybe a minimum post count required before a source can post a thread?

Along spiders lines of secure, and encrypted email, absolutely no orders through PM.

Perhaps the ability to red flag a source thread? If enough members select it it would show the same way the stars do? That way noobs aren't mislead by initially positive posts...

 

[ebkallday]

Looking good so far fellas. I dont have anything else right now that was not already said. I love the idea of this and hope Millard will allow us a sticky. Member's safety is number one priority. These sources will put up or shut up!!

 

[dporders]

It would be nice to see a member code of conduct. This place turns into a circus anytime someone puts up a list.

 

[Candyskull]

It would be nice to see a member code of conduct. This place turns into a circus anytime someone puts up a list.

So don't put up a list. Problem=Solved.

 

[flenser]

It would be nice to see a member code of conduct. This place turns into a circus anytime someone puts up a list.

There IS one. It's called "Steroid Underground RULES" and applies to all members whether they are sources or not. Anyway, I happen to like clowns.

 

[johnnyBALLZ]

It would be nice to see a member code of conduct. This place turns into a circus anytime someone puts up a list.

^^ >>>>>>>>> [)]

 

[drgreenthumb628]

Along the lines of security they should include what other measures they take to protect our security to make sure that there is not a bunch of shit on someones hard drive for months on end

 

[beezil]

PGP encryption key... the sources public key.

 

[beezil]

i would like to see some sort of escrow service enforced such as....
https://paysafeescrow.com/