Its not really the message, its the messenger.
This has become one of the bigger challenges in recent years for forum administrators: encouraging people to separate the message from the messenger.
More broadly speaking, tribalistic thinking has led to people going after the messenger (based on things like political persuasion, gender, sexual orientation, lifestyle choices, etc.) rather than debating/disputing/challenging the message. This is a step beyond the regular ad hominem attacks that often occur.
It seems all rationality and logic goes out the window. We've seen this with political topics: they can't see beyond the political label even when it comes to topics that have nothing to do with politics.
We've seen this on forums when neutral AAS-related questions/threads become totally derailed just because people insist on attacking the political beliefs of the messenger. In some cases, people basically "stalk" and follow the messenger around the forum for the sole purpose of insulting and attacking.
It's not exactly the same when you just don't like the messenger because he is "annoying" but there are similarities.
Furthermore, you may support the message. And not the messenger. But the danger that I've see here is that so many people are (purposely?) confusing the two.
Not only are they rejecting the messenger. They are just as aggressively rejecting the message.
That is unfortunate. Seeking additional testing is basic harm reduction stuff. We should all want more testing from UGLs and for UGL products.