Pinky promises* or that’s how I’ve always heard it said...Didn't know meso now operated on self-vetting and pinky swears.
On the vetting note; any source that doesn’t comply with members requests when said source has any issues that come up will not go over well here imo.
Even though I disagree with how this thread was laid out I don’t disagree with members requests that continuously keep sources in check.
If Stanford decides not to provide what the community is asking for (within reason) then he could always come back as Harvard and end up having to do it anyway...
I believe his fate here is in his own hands. Doesn’t matter what he’s done in the past or even yesterday as far as being a source here goes. It’s what he decides to do in the present that will determine his future as a source here.
And just because I dislike this threads put-togetherness and it’s witch hunt kinda ways, also doesn’t mean I’ll turn my head the other way if Stan decides he’s different than any other source when it comes to being held accountable.
Well it all makes sense in my own head anyways...