Support Glenn Beck

The Most Disturbing Personality on Cable Television
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/02/24/the-most-disturbing-personality-on-cable-television/

Peter Wehner
02.24.2011

In the past few weeks Glenn Beck has spoken about the coming caliphate that he believes is about to envelope most of the world. He then dilated on the anti-Christ with a man who says he has “new prophetic understanding into the end times.” In 2009, this self-proclaimed prophet wrote a column titled “What Obama and the Anti-Christ Have in Common.” Then, on a recent show, the discussion focused on the coming Islamic anti-Christ. And earlier this week, an irate, bellicose Beck spoke about the “perfect storm” America faces. “I can’t honestly believe we’re finally here,” he said in praising his own prescience. In his version of events, Beck is the solitary Voice of Truth willing to expose the New World Order (complete with references to Van Jones and Code Pink).

It’s hard to tell how much of what Beck says is sincere and how much is for show. Whatever the case, and even taking into account the entire MSNBC lineup, Glenn Beck has become the most disturbing personality on cable television. One cannot watch him for any length of time without being struck by his affinity for conspiracies and for portraying himself as the great decoder of events. Political movements are not just wrong; they are infiltrated by a web of malevolent forces. Others see the shadows on the wall; Beck alone sees the men casting them. The danger when one paints the world in such conspiratorial terms is that it devalues the rational side of politics. It encourages a cast of mind that looks to expose enemies rather than to engage in arguments. Few things, after all, are as they appear.

Beyond that, of course, is the sense of impending doom, of the coming Apocalypse, of our world being on the edge of calamity. If taken seriously, this has the effect of creating fear, hopelessness, and feelings of helplessness.

All this is quite troublesome in its own right. But what ought to worry conservatives in particular is that Beck not only has the unusual capacity to discredit virtually every cause he takes up; he also confirms the worst caricatures of the right. What was true before is doubly true today. It looks to me like it’s only a matter of time — and I suspect not much time — until he blows apart professionally. If and when that happens, one can only hope that conservatism as a movement will have created enough distance from Beck to mitigate the damage..


Peter Wehner is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Previously he worked in the administrations of Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and George W. Bush. In the last of which, he served as deputy assistant to the president.
 
Last edited:
Glenn Beck baffles with NPR video critique
Glenn Beck baffles with NPR video critique - Kenneth P. Vogel and Keach Hagey - POLITICO.com

Is Glenn Beck going centrist, reinventing himself as a journalism watchdog, trying to undercut conservative competitors or just sticking it to critics?

All those possibilities and many more have been floated to explain why the fiery talker’s website last week posted an in-depth analysis partially debunking an undercover sting video produced by guerrilla filmmaker James O’Keefe showing NPR executives disparaging conservatives.

The analysis, posted on Beck’s TheBlaze.com website, dissected O’Keefe’s video, welcomed on the right for providing what was regarded as proof of NPR’s liberal bias, and criticized its “deceptive nature.” It has provoked puzzlement from across the political spectrum, and drawn unaccustomed praise from many of the very media outlets and liberal critics who have loudly decried Beck’s polarizing effect on the public discourse.
 
Glen Beck is an successful showman who is getting rich off the ignorance of well meaning idiots like you.


Glenn Beck is a talk show host who is now under fire because he called out president Obama for his comments to Sgt. James Crowley. Beck called Obama a racist for his comments (which was completely accurate) and now the organization colorofchange.org has gone after his advertisers. Several major advertisers have pulled out and now Fox is debating firing Mr. Beck. This man is one of very few figures on television who will stand up and say the truth he needs everyones support. A petition is being sighned supporting him. Please add your name and a comment if you would like.

Support Glenn Beck and Free Speech!


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090824/ap_on_en_tv/us_tv_beck_s_advertisers
 
Goddam, it's getting to the point where I'm fucking embarassed to admit that I'm a voting-life long registered Republican (30 years now). I grew up watching William F. Buckley Jr. on Firing Line. He was an intellectual elitist. To think that his party would wind up rejecting the basic premises of rational discussion because it was just "liberal intellectual elitism" would likely cause him some consternation. I know it does me. If the Republican Party thinks that they can go hard after the "idiot vote" and then expect to me to, wink wink, toe the line because I would never vote for a Democrat, they are sorely mistaken. And ultimately doomed.

Glenn Beck is most certaintly not an idiot, he's just profiting from telling idiots what they want to hear. Kinda brilliant, actually. I have no doubt he'll do just fine without my support. But last time I checked Beck University was not an accredited higher education institution. In my experience, those who have attended accredited universities have a greater faculty for thinking for themselves. Hell, I always thought that's what I was paying for all along. When the fuck did that become a bad thing?
 
Goddam, it's getting to the point where I'm fucking embarassed to admit that I'm a voting-life long registered Republican (30 years now). I grew up watching William F. Buckley Jr. on Firing Line. He was an intellectual elitist. To think that his party would wind up rejecting the basic premises of rational discussion because it was just "liberal intellectual elitism" would likely cause him some consternation. I know it does me. If the Republican Party thinks that they can go hard after the "idiot vote" and then expect to me to, wink wink, toe the line because I would never vote for a Democrat, they are sorely mistaken. And ultimately doomed.

Glenn Beck is most certaintly not an idiot, he's just profiting from telling idiots what they want to hear. Kinda brilliant, actually. I have no doubt he'll do just fine without my support. But last time I checked Beck University was not an accredited higher education institution. In my experience, those who have attended accredited universities have a greater faculty for thinking for themselves. Hell, I always thought that's what I was paying for all along. When the fuck did that become a bad thing?

I agree whole-heartedly. I've been a registered, voting conservative for 22 years and I'm embarassed by the likes of Glenn Beck, Rush, and Michael Savage. They make me sick. I'm tired of the shit that comes out of their pie-holes. Nothing but hate and fear! I despise people like them who make their living off of constant shit stirring. Hell, sometimes I think the great conspiracy that will be uncovered is that those guys are Democrat "plants". :D
 
Last edited:
I agree whole-heartedly. I've been a registered, voting conservative for 22 years and I'm embarassed by the likes of Glenn Beck, Rush, and Michael Savage.
I don't begrudge them their ability to capitalize and profit on the ignorance of the population. I am disappointed that they've been able to become obscenely wealthy by doing so. I refuse to admit the inevitable inference that we are collectively that stupid. But I may be in denial.

They make me sick. I'm tired of the shit that comes out of their pie-holes. Nothing but hate and fear! I despise people like them who make their living off of constant shit stirring.
Nah, they don't bother me, they're just sucking the tit for all it's worth. Limbaugh's the most brilliant of them all. He insults his fans while simultaneously endearing their support. When I hear "dittohead" I think toady, lackey, and sycophant. Why the fuck would I want to be that? ... Wait, you want me to give money to you or your interests so that you can continue to insult my intelligence? That's just fuckin' genius.

Hell, sometimes I think the great conspiracy that will be uncovered is that those guys are Democrat "plants". :D
To think that the Democrats are the least bit capable of Machiavellian tactics is absurd. They are contrary to their platform. Even if they tried to employ them it would look ridiculous. Not much has changed since Will Rogers reported in 1935 that "I am not a member of any organized party — I am a Democrat."
 
Now we are talking about meaningful shit.
Hell, I was brought up as a Republican and Presbyterian.
I questioned both.
 
I doubt it. ... Because I doubt there is meaningful shit.


You'd be an idiot if you hadn't.

We need to direct the conversation towards just what the new pseudo republican strategy aims for.
I contend that the goal is for selfish gains at the expense of the rest of the world.
Its time for the rich to stop getting richer and to pay their dues.

Whadda say Dennis? Did you make an obscene amount of money?
Is it really easier for a camel to pass thru the eye of a needle than a rich man to gain entrance into heaven?
 
We need to direct the conversation towards just what the new pseudo republican strategy aims for.
I contend that the goal is for selfish gains at the expense of the rest of the world.
Well, we don't need to but I guess we could. That is not the foundation of what I feel to be the fundamental philosophy of the Republican Party. But it is an accurate characterizaton of the Republican Party's recent behavior. Did I mention that I am currently embarrassed to admit that I'm a voting-life long registered Republican?

Its time for the rich to stop getting richer and to pay their dues.
And many of them agree. Hell, neither me nor my actuary brother are rich, but every August we both get a $700/month raise because we hit the Social Security income cap. He ran the numbers, eliminate the Social Security income cap and Social Security is solvent for like, forever. We are both willing to make that sacrifice (I mean we're already used to budgeting not having that money). Why shouldn't we expect a truly rich bastard to make a similar sacrifice?

Some 30 years ago now, when my brother first started studying to be an actuary, he asked me what I thought about "Trickledown Economics" where the idea is the more the rich benefit the more the rest of us benefit. My 18 yo ass said, "Sounds like bullshit to me." My brother said, "Yeah, it's more like Tinkledown Economics where they keep pissing on you telling you it's champagne hoping that you will eventually believe it."

Is it really easier for a camel to pass thru the eye of a needle than a rich man to gain entrance into heaven?
It really is.
 
Last edited:
Lest We Forget
http://www.frumforum.com/lest-we-forget

As the gold market tumbles, time to recall: even if the price of gold had remained high forever, people who trusted in Glenn Beck would still have been cruelly cheated.

I’m trying to recall a worse case of media ethics malpractice than Glenn Beck and Goldline, but thus far I draw a blank.

9766
 

Attachments

  • GoldlineGlennBeck4.jpg
    GoldlineGlennBeck4.jpg
    670.8 KB · Views: 9
Back
Top