Oldschool
Member
Haha. Nice to see you around. Glad you are back from the grave.Well unfortunately things happen when you get drunk..
Im still puzzled why every Friday @MisterSuperGod text me and ask. “HEY YOU DRINKING THIS WEEKEND?”
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
SymBiotics (U.S. domestic)
- Thread starter SymBiotics
- Start date
Robby550
Well-known Member
@SymBiotics or anyone who knows the answer does sym still have 15% discount for monero? Thanks
HIGHRISK
Pro
Man it was rough af! Lol back to the grind now
Yes. It’s at the bottom of his pastebin list.
Night_Owl
Well-known Member
@bambam333 hey man no worries, go to Settings and then to Keys.
Click on Add New Key and then go through the process.
Or go to this link directly:
- https://mail.protonmail.com/keys
Please be careful though, if you remove your old key your emails will be unreadable.
Please see screenshot:
Click on Add New Key and then go through the process.
Or go to this link directly:
- https://mail.protonmail.com/keys
Please be careful though, if you remove your old key your emails will be unreadable.
Please see screenshot:
@bambam333 hey man no worries, go to Settings and then to Keys.
Click on Add New Key and then go through the process.
Or go to this link directly:
- https://mail.protonmail.com/keys
Please be careful though, if you remove your old key your emails will be unreadable.
Please see screenshot:
thank you appreciate it
Now that Dyna has confirmed on his own thread that the EQ was sourced from him, it seems he is taking credibility away from the two separate labs you submitted and stating that his product’s purity could not of been compromised, and this has been the only report of issues with his raws in regards to purity. Stating You said “ you have successfully ripped him off”.
Of course I’m stirring the pot here but I’m sure you will address his post from his thread in regards to the accusations to perhaps give some clarity on this matter.
TNotch347
Well-known Member
I wonder who’s screwing who...
Iron_Yuppie
Well-known Member
Two independent tests confirming the impurity of a product should be enough to assume that the product is in fact not what it’s purported to be. At that point you don’t blame the buyer. Isn’t the whole reason we ask for testing because we want sources to know what they’re selling us (which in turn helps us know what we’re buying)? Dyna seems like he’s trying to be a standup guy, but it makes no sense to assume one of his buyers would monkey with his product, get it tested, then post the results. Occam’s Razor says that the product was diluted before it was shipped to its final destination and tests pretty much prove that.
Villain
Member
@SymBiotics forgive me if I missed this - was the raw EQ tested prior to the brew?
He brewed it but got tests back and pinned the stuff and so far so good. He is selling the impure EQ which is suppose to be 300 mg but at 70% purity now is something like 210 mg. He is not labeling it and selling at 15$ a vial. Or something like that. But not putting on the list of products for sale do to the impure nature.
Villain
Member
Ok thanks. I wasn’t sure if he tested the raws as well, since he usually does that too.
Kel995
Member
Anybody ran his gear yet? Or any other test?
JP1979
Well-known Member
I did bloodwork a few weeks ago on his Test C in MCT
Kel995
Member
Requesting spoon feed; protocol and result?
JP1979
Well-known Member
87.5mg Every 3rd day, 1195 Total Serum
Maktub
Well-known Member
Love your honesty brother
I'd like to offer you all my final comments on the lab tests I posted.
The testosterone cypionate and boldenone undecylenate were purchased from the same raw provider. Both were compounded with an expected dosage. One sample was sent as a finished oil and the other sample was reserved from the raw material. This is what I said I would do when I agreed to send identical samples to 2 different analytical labs: 1 raw sample and 1 finished sample.
I chose to send the finished test-C because I was almost out; and I needed to release that batch for sale. I also felt that the EQ raw was 1) different in viscosity than what I was used to and 2) packaged in containers that were obviously not what it originally came in; so it seemed to me to be most efficient and helpful to do it the way I did.
I feel that the test-C raw was very pure because the results on the finished product were very close to my anticipated concentration.
The boldenone raw was drawn directly from one of the two containers it was shipped to me in; and then dispensed into 2 autosampler vials.
The test-C sample was drawn from a finished vial and likewise dispensed into 2 autosampler vials.
Each compound had the same number on each of the respective vials.
Both samples were sent the same way at the same time.
Results were posted at my earliest opportunity after the 2nd set of results were given to me.
I'd like to say that I did not benefit from these tests in any way other than following through with the word I gave to this forum over a month ago to have these tests performed.
I chose these two samples because these were the first products I purchased from any new supplier. It felt like the prudent course of action for my own peace of mind.
I feel like I was wrong to say publicly that “I am convinced the shipper” caused this problem. I was wrong for that because I have only deductive reasoning that lacks sufficient evidence. I can only say for sure that the last person to lay hands on the product I ordered was the shipper; and that the source and I previously had a tenuous conversation on the shipping methods for a different order.
I do not know who diluted the EQ raw or who used my receiver's address in a threatening email to me; but I am certain that I did neither of those things.
The rest of my products have or will test well. And the diluted EQ isn't a total loss because I can sell it for a lower price and someone can buy it for a lower price. I am determined to turn the lemon into lemonade.
There was another order pending with this same source that I have declined the offer to receive. I am still convinced that the owner of this source is a person of integrity and I harbor no hard feelings; but I will never do less than my best to satisfy the word I give for my intentions to serve this community. We may again do business together; or we may not: I try not to speculate on the future. However, I do intend to rely on my trusted source as much as possible for future purchases.
In summary: I made 3 purchases from this vendor. I received two of them; all issues with the shipments were discussed and dealt with with professional communication by the owner of the source. I believe the owner of the operation to be a person of integrity and a pleasure to deal with. I purchased TC, NPP, and EQ raws. The test-C tested good, the NPP has not been tested or compounded; the EQ tested poorly. This is not nor will it be a source on source battle. These lab results are mixed good and bad and were posted only as a requirement to fulfill the request given to me by this forum to test two analytical services on identical samples. That request has been fulfilled to the best of my ability; and I consider myself done with this project.
I had a conversation late last night/early this morning with this source and I gave him full permission to copy/paste and/or screenshot every word I said in our correspondence.
I hope any information requests have been satisfied by this post because I can't think of anything else I have to say.
Regarding the two other domestic raw providers I used recently: I cannot comment about the products because I do not have results yet. I am skeptical of one product from one supplier; and I have not received the remaining product from the other supplier. When these results are available they will be posted. I do not know yet whether the source will be revealed in the instance of any future spurious results. There is significant risk already for a person in my position; and retaliation could be devastating for me and my family. I definitely do want to benefit this community; but I will not do so at the risk of my family's safety. I hope this can be understood and appreciated.
The testosterone cypionate and boldenone undecylenate were purchased from the same raw provider. Both were compounded with an expected dosage. One sample was sent as a finished oil and the other sample was reserved from the raw material. This is what I said I would do when I agreed to send identical samples to 2 different analytical labs: 1 raw sample and 1 finished sample.
I chose to send the finished test-C because I was almost out; and I needed to release that batch for sale. I also felt that the EQ raw was 1) different in viscosity than what I was used to and 2) packaged in containers that were obviously not what it originally came in; so it seemed to me to be most efficient and helpful to do it the way I did.
I feel that the test-C raw was very pure because the results on the finished product were very close to my anticipated concentration.
The boldenone raw was drawn directly from one of the two containers it was shipped to me in; and then dispensed into 2 autosampler vials.
The test-C sample was drawn from a finished vial and likewise dispensed into 2 autosampler vials.
Each compound had the same number on each of the respective vials.
Both samples were sent the same way at the same time.
Results were posted at my earliest opportunity after the 2nd set of results were given to me.
I'd like to say that I did not benefit from these tests in any way other than following through with the word I gave to this forum over a month ago to have these tests performed.
I chose these two samples because these were the first products I purchased from any new supplier. It felt like the prudent course of action for my own peace of mind.
I feel like I was wrong to say publicly that “I am convinced the shipper” caused this problem. I was wrong for that because I have only deductive reasoning that lacks sufficient evidence. I can only say for sure that the last person to lay hands on the product I ordered was the shipper; and that the source and I previously had a tenuous conversation on the shipping methods for a different order.
I do not know who diluted the EQ raw or who used my receiver's address in a threatening email to me; but I am certain that I did neither of those things.
The rest of my products have or will test well. And the diluted EQ isn't a total loss because I can sell it for a lower price and someone can buy it for a lower price. I am determined to turn the lemon into lemonade.
There was another order pending with this same source that I have declined the offer to receive. I am still convinced that the owner of this source is a person of integrity and I harbor no hard feelings; but I will never do less than my best to satisfy the word I give for my intentions to serve this community. We may again do business together; or we may not: I try not to speculate on the future. However, I do intend to rely on my trusted source as much as possible for future purchases.
In summary: I made 3 purchases from this vendor. I received two of them; all issues with the shipments were discussed and dealt with with professional communication by the owner of the source. I believe the owner of the operation to be a person of integrity and a pleasure to deal with. I purchased TC, NPP, and EQ raws. The test-C tested good, the NPP has not been tested or compounded; the EQ tested poorly. This is not nor will it be a source on source battle. These lab results are mixed good and bad and were posted only as a requirement to fulfill the request given to me by this forum to test two analytical services on identical samples. That request has been fulfilled to the best of my ability; and I consider myself done with this project.
I had a conversation late last night/early this morning with this source and I gave him full permission to copy/paste and/or screenshot every word I said in our correspondence.
I hope any information requests have been satisfied by this post because I can't think of anything else I have to say.
Regarding the two other domestic raw providers I used recently: I cannot comment about the products because I do not have results yet. I am skeptical of one product from one supplier; and I have not received the remaining product from the other supplier. When these results are available they will be posted. I do not know yet whether the source will be revealed in the instance of any future spurious results. There is significant risk already for a person in my position; and retaliation could be devastating for me and my family. I definitely do want to benefit this community; but I will not do so at the risk of my family's safety. I hope this can be understood and appreciated.
It is a royal pain in the behind the way I am doing it; and extraordinarily inconvenient. That is about all I can say about it.
My last post for the day:
I need a couple of days to catch up from the weekend; so I will not be accepting any orders until Wednesday night. Thank you all for your patience.
I need a couple of days to catch up from the weekend; so I will not be accepting any orders until Wednesday night. Thank you all for your patience.
Similar threads
