Of course not.
Everyone knows i have always asked for honest and unbiased feedback. Whether testing, pip field test reports, anything.
Now i have people questioning my gear, my greed, my agenda, etc.
Meso wanted a tested source with a fast t/a that responds to criticism, has no problem keeping up with stock, and accessible to most everyone.
I attempted to deliver just that. Hoping to make a difference or an impact. Because of these reports, i have been called into question on numerous things.
I have to ask myself, is it worth it? There are those that do a fraction of what i do, yet they remain. I post 2 suspect reports and have
@iceman440 (sorry to single you out dude) say "maybe we are too soft on him, enforce the standard". Who attained this "stardard"? Who maintains this "standard"? Who is the ONLY completely tested source that continues to try to evolve and grow according to the community and the feedback from the community?
So....i sit here tonight, wondering, if i tested raws and finished on everything, would it matter? If i stop doing bulk orders for those not on my list, will that please more people or piss off more people?
What does it take to not be the one under the microscope when I, the only one after learning of 2 conflicting reports l, immediately post them.
Knowing they are from a tester with a history...and knowing my track record of transparency...first question wasn't are the tests valid. First was "so is it over or under"? Nobody once thought the EQ might be spot on and the reports not even credible. So obviously any rep i have tried to built has been a fruitless attempt.
I stand by my actions regarding the testing and @jano and
@Joedaddy5150.
I don't know what else to do, if anything. It would be nice to do what i do minus the games and the fuckery. That seems like a pipe dream though.