MESO-Rx Exclusive Trenbolone facts - series on unique characteristics of different steroids

[gbochatt]

Looking forward to it! Yeah I thought Taeian Clark was either a very intelligent autist or an idiot at first but the more I read from him it's definitely the second of the two

I will say I tried deca/dbol myself to see and it will throw on strength and size quickly and joints feel great plus not having to worry about AI or hair loss makes it idiot proof. But I do worry about living on it for life like some people on his FB group. I'm not sure how good long term deca is for your heart or dbol for your liver

Haha that’s exactly what my thought process was! He definitely is willing to experiment which I respect but he cannot take any kind of criticism, and seems to lean too heavily on studies that support his claims rather than the totality of the evidence.

I don’t plan to transition fully to a deca base unless it’s just that much better than test. I already just run TRT with anabolics to begin with, test isn’t anything more than a base to me.

 

[Ateam2023]

I am thinking about starting a cycle log thread but am not confident posting pics yet

Reading the tren recomping stories drives me insane because it seems so much more effective than taking testosterone for recomping. I have also been rethinking whether or not “test is best” is even true. It seems like what people do is get massive off nandrolone or trenbolone and then once they have enough muscle they settle down to just taking TRT and telling everyone testosterone is all you need to get big, everything else is toxic.

Tren Train ,,

 

[rexy]

I have also been rethinking whether or not “test is best” is even true. It seems like what people do is get massive off nandrolone or trenbolone and then once they have enough muscle they settle down to just taking TRT and telling everyone testosterone is all you need to get big, everything else is toxic.

That is also the consensus I've come to. Whilst the big guys usually also did moderate-to-high amounts of testosterone along the way (like John Jewett for example), anyone with decent size and who looks truly impressive almost always has a considerable period where they used decent amounts of Tren/Nand at somepoint if you dig into their background.

There are always exceptions of course - but I think the reality is that even in those cases where the genetically blessed could do it on a teaspoon of Test, they would still do better on these combos if it can be tolerated. Get in with the harsh compounds early to build, then get out and rely on the 'safer' ones to slowly refine at a weight-cap/where you're happy with your look.

I find people tend to promote the Test only or Test/DHT combo in the following sort of situations:

1) Risk reduction to other people - not a bad thing of course, just highlighting what people recommend years in is often aligned with their own biased experience and where they are at currently rather than how they got there.

2) They are highly advanced but can no longer tolerate nand/tren and have no choice.

3) Succeed with Test/DHT combinations in spite of them - not because they are 'better'.

4) The fact that it's mostly those who've 'made' it giving that advice. They are usually highly advanced already and refining a physique at a weight cap with no need/ability to grow much now. Usually they then start giving advice they didn’t actually take themselves and not representative of how they actually grew to that size. They may think after the fact that they would have done it differently and 'regret' using Tren etc if they ended up having an issue with it, but they can't know for sure if they'd ever have been able to attain the same mass without. They can only speculate on that, and the reality is - just to make things even muddier - usually you don't hear from the people that didn't or don't have issues with Nand/Tren. So that skews it further.

 

[gbochatt]

That is also the consensus I've come to. Whilst the big guys usually also did moderate-to-high amounts of testosterone along the way (like John Jewett for example), anyone with decent size and who looks truly impressive almost always has a considerable period where they used decent amounts of Tren/Nand at somepoint if you dig into their background.

There are always exceptions of course - but I think the reality is that even in those cases where the genetically blessed could do it on a teaspoon of Test, they would still do better on these combos if it can be tolerated. Get in with the harsh compounds early to build, then get out and rely on the 'safer' ones to slowly refine at a weight-cap/where you're happy with your look.

I find people tend to promote the Test only or Test/DHT combo in the following sort of situations:

1) Risk reduction to other people - not a bad thing of course, just highlighting what people recommend years in is often aligned with their own biased experience and where they are at currently rather than how they got there.

2) They are highly advanced but can no longer tolerate nand/tren and have no choice.

3) Succeed with Test/DHT combinations in spite of them - not because they are 'better'.

4) The fact that it's mostly those who've 'made' it giving that advice. They are usually highly advanced already and refining a physique at a weight cap with no need/ability to grow much now. Usually they then start giving advice they didn’t actually take themselves and not representative of how they actually grew to that size. They may think after the fact that they would have done it differently and 'regret' using Tren etc if they ended up having an issue with it, but they can't know for sure if they'd ever have been able to attain the same mass without. They can only speculate on that, and the reality is - just to make things even muddier - usually you don't hear from the people that didn't or don't have issues with Nand/Tren. So that skews it further.

This is where I’m at and is the reason I plan to do a deca base for my offseason, possibly with tren e as well. I tolerate both very well now and have a lot of weight to gain to fill out my frame for open bodybuilding. Realistically I think at my height I need to be 250+ on stage to get a pro card and 270+ to be a good pro. Currently I’m 205ish on stage but just started on the sauce in July. From my perspective there isn’t any real way to do that in a timely manner without pushing the gas.

 

[TheScholarOfBrew]

Tren mentioned. Rep

 

[turbota]

This is where I’m at and is the reason I plan to do a deca base for my offseason, possibly with tren e as well. I tolerate both very well now and have a lot of weight to gain to fill out my frame for open bodybuilding. Realistically I think at my height I need to be 250+ on stage to get a pro card and 270+ to be a good pro. Currently I’m 205ish on stage but just started on the sauce in July. From my perspective there isn’t any real way to do that in a timely manner without pushing the gas.

 

[TomGlass]

Tren Train ,, View attachment 319213

#TrenBoySummer

 

[allBlack]

Anyone experienced extremely bad lipids on Tren.

I was running a 500mg test and 200mg tren cycle. After 6 weeks decided to check whats happening.

Do note this is on a slight recomp with calories 250 below maintenance.

I'm 5.9 about 210lbs with a bf of about 15%