A good sign that the Wall Street Journal was accurate in reporting that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was on a call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was the lack of denial from the White House. The White House and the president deny true things all the time, but generally around the edges — as when press secretary Stephanie Grisham
tried to claim that Trump hadn’t urged Zelensky to work with his lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani because “Zelensky mentioned [Giuliani] first.”
After the Pompeo report, though? Nothing. No “fake news!!” tweet from Trump; nothing from Grisham suggesting that the Journal was bent on Trump’s destruction. And, sure enough, on Wednesday, Pompeo https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-whistleblower/2019/10/02/80df829a-e494-11e9-b403-f738899982d2_story.html?tid=lk_inline_manual_3 (admitted) his participation on the call.
When the Journal story broke, it came as a surprise. A complaint filed by an intelligence community whistleblower mentioned that they’d been told that a senior State Department staff member was on the call, but not Pompeo himself. So when Pompeo was asked about the call after it became public knowledge, he knew something no one else did: He was privy to it in real time.
That was not information he revealed when asked about the issue. Instead, he offered a master class in misleading the public without technically saying anything untrue.
On
ABC’s “This Week” on Sept. 22 — before the White House had released a rough transcript of the call — host Martha Raddatz raised the issue of the whistleblower complaint and the call with Pompeo.
“The Wall Street Journal is reporting that President Trump pressed the president of Ukraine eight times to work with Rudy Giuliani to investigate Joe Biden’s son,” Raddatz said. “What do you know about those conversations?”
The honest answer is that Pompeo knew a lot, having been on the phone. That’s not what Pompeo said.