MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse

Michael Scally MD said:
AN IDIOT HIDES EVIDENCE
An Idiot Hides Evidence

We know Donald Trump is an idiot. But at times, it’s shocking just how transparent he is.

Often, an idiot reveals himself without an explicit statement. Like when a racist is too stupid to understand that the black-friend defense reveals they’re a racist, which is something every single Trump supporter does. But rarely do you find one who claims you can’t prove they’re a racist because they deleted all their racist comments from Facebook.

Trump does this at times. Like when he says he’s not a racist because there’s his “African-American,” or when he claims he’s innocent of sexually assaulting a woman because she doesn’t meet his standards. Trump is so transparent that his tell-tell is projection. When he accuses someone of something, it’s usually later revealed he’s guilty of the accusation. He often takes on the childish defense of “I’m rubber, you’re glue,” like he did in a debate with Hillary Clinton when she said he’s “Putin’s puppet.” I’ve written it before and I’ll do so again: I’m half expecting the revelation Sniffy was born in Kenya.

Trump’s defense against impeachment hasn’t been that he didn’t do what he’s accused of. Even Bill Clinton admitted his guilt of an affair. Trump never admits he did something wrong and those who support him are expected to follow his lead.

What Donald Trump did with Ukraine was ask a foreign government to help with his reelection. He asked a foreign government to go after a political opponent. He withheld military aid, approved by Congress, in an extortion scheme. Later, he asked China to investigate his political opponent. Donald Trump rephrases it but he’s admitted to all of this. At the very least, you would think he’d say “oops.” But no, we get “It was a perfect phone call.” No, it wasn’t. Now his fellow Republicans and lawyers have to go out and argue it was a “perfect phone call” and that it’s OK for a president to bribe a foreign government and ask them to meddle in an American election. Notice you don’t hear “no collusion” anymore? That’s because collusion is OK now.

Donald Trump’s administration has ignored subpoenas for documents and directed members of the administration not to respond to subpoena requests since the beginning of the impeachment process. While his lawyers and Republicans argue that he has the right to cite executive privilege, he hasn’t done so in this matter. Executive privilege doesn’t cover everything. It covers specific conversations and subjects, not anything and everything.

During Bill Clinton’s impeachment, his administration provided over 90,000 pages of documents. Even Richard Nixon turned over tapes and documents.

Trump said former National Security Adviser John Bolton couldn’t testify because he might reveal how Trump feels about other world leaders. Does it get worse than calling the Canadian Prime Minister “two-faced,” or Denmark’s Prime Minister “Nasty,” or even Kim Jong Un “Little Rocket Man?” That’s really only how executive privilege works if you’re a mean girl in high school.

Trump was probably thinking about how he felt about world leaders, who are often caught on tape making fun of him because he was at an international summit. He was asked how he thought the impeachment trial was going. In his answer, Donald Trump admitted to withholding evidence.

He said, “So, we’re doing very well. I got to watch enough. I thought our team did a very good job. But honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material.” And right then, he gave House Democrats more material to work with. Donald Trump has admitted to obstruction justice.

This would be like Bill Clinton saying he’ll survive impeachment because he paid for dry cleaning Monica’s blue dress, or Richard Nixon saying he won’t get caught because he taped over the Oval Office tapes with Burt Bacharach’s greatest hits.

Trump’s administration has gone from “no quid pro quo” to “get over it.” They even refuse to let the guy who made that admission testify. Now, they’ve gone from “no collusion” to Trump telling George Stephanoplous before this mess began that he’d accept help from a foreign government to “the president (sic) can do whatever he wants.”

Apparently, whatever he wants includes obstruction and concealing evidence. Donald Trump is guilty and a criminal who should be immediately frogmarched into the nearest federal prison with every Republican chucklefuck who’s participated in his corruption.

Donald Trump is an idiot who’s dumb enough to admit his guilt. But with Republicans controlling the Senate, it doesn’t matter.

View attachment 124777
Click to expand...
"Donald Trump’s administration has ignored subpoenas for documents and directed members of the administration not to respond to subpoena requests since the beginning of the impeachment process. While his lawyers and Republicans argue that he has the right to cite executive privilege, he hasn’t done so in this matter. Executive privilege doesn’t cover everything. It covers specific conversations and subjects, not anything and everything."

OF COURSE IT DOESNT COVER EVERYTHING. MAYBE IF CONGRESS LET THE COURT SORT IT OUT LIKE ITS SUPPOSED TO, WE WOULD KNOW WHAT IS EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND WHAYS NOT IN THIS MATTER. NOT TO MENTION IF CONGRESS TAKES THE FIGHT TO THE COURTS, AND THEN TRUMP STILL REFUSES TO COMPLY, YOU THEN CAN CHARGE HIM OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, A REAL CRIME.


"He said, “So, we’re doing very well. I got to watch enough. I thought our team did a very good job. But honestly, we have all the material. They don’t have the material.” And right then, he gave House Democrats more material to work with. Donald Trump has admitted to obstruction justice."

OF COURSE HE HAS THE MATERIALS, HE RUNS THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND ALL THE DEPARTMENTS THAT FALL WITHIN IT. HE DOESNT HAVE TO TURN IT OVER TO CONGRESS BECAUSE OF A SUBPOENA, THATS NOT A CRIME. HE TURNS IT OVER WHEN THE COURTS TELL HIM TO TURN IT OVER. WHICH CONGRESS NEVER ELECTED TO FIGHT. THE PRES IS SUCH A THREAT TO NATIONAL SECURITY WE CANT WAIT FOR COURTS TO SORT IT OUT. WE DEFINITELY CANT WAIT FOR THE NOVEMBER ELECTION. AND WE SURE AS HELL CANT WAIT FOR IT TO RUN INTO DEM PRIMARY SEASON. LETS RUSH IT THROUGH, THEN SIT ON THE ARTICLES STRATEGICALLY(I GUESS THE CIRCUMSTANCES WERENT SO DIRE) AND THEN BEG THE SENATE TO INVESTIGATE HIM FOR US. HYPOCRITES.


"Apparently, whatever he wants includes obstruction and concealing evidence. Donald Trump is guilty and a criminal who should be immediately frogmarched into the nearest federal prison with every Republican chucklefuck who’s participated in his corruption."

THIS PIECE OF POETRY SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. THE DEMS SUBPOENAD A JOURNALISTS PHONE RECORDS, THE DEMS SUBPOENAED A CONGRESSMANS PHONE RECORDS, THE DEMS STILL HAVENT RELEASED INSPECTOR GENERALS TESTIMONY INVOLVONG THE WHISTLEBLOWER COVER UP AND SCHIFF WHISTLEBLOWER COLLUSION.

Those are crimes those are cover ups. That's abuse of power.
 


There's been a lot of talk about President Donald Trump's choice of Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr as lawyers participating in his Senate impeachment trial defense. Most of this has rightly focused on the arguments both men presented at President Bill Clinton's impeachment in 1999, which stand in almost laughable contradiction to the arguments they now seek to present. But when these two hired guns are examined alongside their latest famous client, another more troubling thread emerges, one that has been all too common for those in Trump's orbit. These guys really don't like women.

While the president still stands accused of sexual misconduct, including rape, by more than 20 women, both of these lawyers are deeply embroiled in their own sexual misconduct and assault scandals.

You don't have to go back very far to find skeletons in this legal odd couple's closets. The two famous Fox News faces teamed up to help billionaire Jeffrey Epstein — a man Trump called a "terrific guy" who enjoyed "younger" women. Starr has come under fire for assisting in Epstein's defense in 2007. That effort resulted in an egregiously lenient 2008 plea deal.

Dershowitz's involvement with Epstein goes considerably further. Not only did Dershowitz help negotiate the part of the plea deal that granted total immunity for named Epstein co-conspirators and unnamed "potential co-conspirators," but the lawyer himself stands accused of participating in the abuse, a charge he vehemently denies.

Here's some of what we know about Dershowitz. Although Dershowitz prides himself on being a tenacious defender of civil liberties and a staunch advocate of everyone's constitutional right to a defense, he has a long record of defending a certain type of client: prominent men accused of committing violence against women. He chose to help O.J. Simpson when the former NFL star was accused of murdering his wife; he crafted a defense for Jeffrey MacDonald, the former Green Beret doctor convicted of killing his wife and two daughters; he led the appeal for British socialite Claus von Bulow, who was accused of attempting to murder his wife; and he represented boxer Mike Tyson, who had been convicted of raping an 18-year-old Miss Black America contestant. He also joined the team defending former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein from a civil suit (that case has reached a tentative settlement).

There's nothing wrong with a constitutional lawyer coming to the aid of well-known men accused of horrible crimes; everyone deserves the best defense possible. But Dershowitz has also admitted to getting massages at Epstein's home — going so far as to note he kept on his underwear — hardly standard lawyer/client behavior, and certainly not the kind of high-minded ideals to which our system aspires.

Many of the most disturbing things about Dershowitz are things he himself has said. In a Los Angeles Times op-ed on May 7, 1997, titled, "Statutory Rape Is an Outdated Concept," Dershowitz challenged the laws that criminalize sex with underage girls. In that piece, the former Harvard University law professor argues that the age of consent "certainly should not be as high 17 or 16. Reasonable people can disagree over whether it should be as low as 14."
 
"Well, the genesis of impeachment, to be very candid with you, was when the president was running for office and he had members of his own party to talk about his unfitness to hold office," Green told Hayes, later citing rhetoric from Sen. Mitt Romney, R-Utah; Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., from the 2016 election. "So the president didn't have the luxury of persons from his party having been on his side as it were throughout this entire ordeal."


"I'm concerned that if we don't impeach the president, he will get reelected," Green said in May. "If we don't impeach him, he will say that he has been vindicated, he will say the Democrats had an overwhelming majority in the House and they didn't take up impeachment. He will say that we had a constitutional duty to do it if it was there and we didn't. He will say that he has been vindicated."

DEM Rep Al green

When they tell you that you're crazy, we had to impeach the president. Dont spread conspiracy theories. This is our constitutional obligation...

Heres a house dem telling you they've been working on impeachment since trump was campaigning.

That they cant leave it up to the American people. We cant let democracy run its course.

So who's really doing the conspiring???
 
NorthMich said:
You’re another deluded sycophant.

Hitler had them, too. All dictators have them
Click to expand...
Heres an example of what the left does. I dont agree with this guy. I can not debate him on the substance of what hes saying. So I'll use an ad hominem attack. I'll attack the man, because I dont have the intellectual fortitude to debate(or even properly tag) him on the substance of what hes saying.

That's what the left does. Call him a racist, call him a bigot(or in your case a deluded sycophant). So you don't have to debate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
TRT(+) and a fresh slate.
Replies
8
Views
140
Mr_Fusion
M
R
New here: My TRT Story
Replies
2
Views
355
DMann
D
C
Steroids. My opinion has changed.
2 3 4
Replies
78
Views
4K
ClownCatcher
C
H
New member intro
Replies
0
Views
128
holy02
H
jdubzzz44
GH15 Bodybuilding for the poor (2012)
Replies
17
Views
938
Jaxino
J

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top