Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TRUMP is VerY good with business ..
Well he's a billionaire so I'd say that pretty much covers my side of the argument!Ha. Haha. Hahaha hahaha.......
Well he's a billionaire
His name is in the ghetto dictionary!I honestly doubt it. He's claimed ten billion, Forbes believes he's around 3 and the accounts that I believe estimate his net worth to be closer to 200 million once his enormous debt is considered. Forbes estimated Elizabeth Holmes was a billionare too... google her.
The only successful aspect of Trump's life is his ability to brand himself. That's it.
There is nothing extraordinary about Trump as a businessman. He inherited a great deal of wealth and made money in NY doing real estate during a time that many people made lots of money in real estate in NY. He's a successful con man, not a successful businessman.
Trump will put this country in the right direction without a doubt
Trump will be a disaster.
The majority of individuals voting for Trump are only doing so because he's not Hillary. Anyone who actually believes in Trump's policies is very foolish... his tax plan alone will add about 10 trillion to our debt. Luckily, he's a man who already knows how to operate under heavy debt I guess? But make America great again? Get real. His only plans for infrastructure that in aware of are to build a wall lol.
I get the argument that they are both bad but Hillary is worse because she's "evil" ... what a pathetic excuse to use in the decision to vote in a completely unqualified person into the white house. We will be the laughing stock of the world except of course for Russia... think about that for a minute.
Then the voters that refuse to vote due to moral reasons... They don't want to vote in either candidate because they are "evil". For Christ sake... voting isn't a moral decision. It's a strategic decision. Citizenship over individualism and quite frankly, a civic duty. Further, there is NO such thing as not voting. Food for thought.
Oh and I'm a great guy too, many people are saying this. Can I count on your vote? I promise, I'll be so great it'll make your head spin - I'll even hold meetings with my family prior to making serious political decisions.
Strongly disagree. Voting is not a duty or obligation and there is a such thing as not voting. Voting is a right. Period. Much like the right of freedom of religion or free speech, you're not obligated to believe in anything or use your speech.
Strongly disagree. Voting is not a duty or obligation and there is a such thing as not voting. Voting is a right. Period. Much like the right of freedom of religion or free speech, you're not obligated to believe in anything or use your speech.
If compulsory voting ever becomes a reality in this country, this would become a very ironic and interesting conversation.
That's certainly your prerogative, Doc.
However, not voting is still voting. Inaction is action.
Perhaps the powers that be would like to thank you for not voting. Less intervention of the governed is no problem for them.
Staying home on voting day is a vote all the same, it just means you have no voice and even less strategy. There is no moral high ground to be had by "putting your foot down" although it's sadly widespread in modern times.
Voting is not comparable to free speech or religion either although I understand your analogy because it's made often in political science. You may be right, it's debatable that voting is a duty - it's most certainly a right. I believe it's an obligatory right though. It's not the same to compare the obligation aspect to free speech or religion IMO.
How much does your voice count if you vote compared to mine?
What is the difference in voice compared to a vote vs a non vote?
Um.. a 100% difference. Lol.
It doesn't bother me THAT much that ppl don't vote. Claiming a moral high ground is annoying and humorous simultaneously though.
I don't claim a moral high ground. I just refuse to play a game that's rigged from the beginning and one that is corrupt under the influence of money.
My real question was, how much more of a voice does a voter have vs a non-voter?
Just to clarify, I wasn't accusing you. Just talking.
Different question but my answer doesn't change much actually. The fact that one vote is not only for a candidate but, perhaps more importantly, a vote AGAINST another.
I think a lot of your beliefs in regards to voting are based in something called the downs paradox. But the downs paradox only applies when ONE vote is what makes a difference compared to the voice of the collective I believe.
A lot of people in this country play directly into political cynicism rather than simply playing the game. Not voting is political cynicism at it's finest, your own reasons for abstention. But it's playing right into the politicians hands because you're not voting for anyone and thus are not voting against anyone all the same. It's your right though - people have fought and died to protect your right to participate AND abstain. I'll stop you before you say it, they did fight for other issues too.