Well Mands, google scholar is a great tool. I have access to the databases where the studies are but you can also use google scholar too. But you have to be able to actually interpret studies too. None of my posts are copy and pasted unless I am copying and pasting to reference an article. Which is what I am supposed to do no? I think people cannot refute arguments and then go to personal attacks and name calling such as "google ninja" or whatever. But Didn't CBS "google these studies?" Yes he did, however he wasn't able to comprehend and discuss the material and it ended up with him running away from the thread:
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/think-dnp-can-be-used-safely-think-again.134364167/
http://forums.steroid.com/hormone-replacement-therapy-low-testosterone-treatment-anti-aging/519006-trenbolone-hrt-better-than-testosterone.html
It is actually a good thread, read through it. If you want, tell me why trenbolone or any other androgen/SARM couldn't be used in HRT along side hCG?
Why is testosterone the optimal hormone? Would using another hormone in HRT which doesn't convert to DHT so it would minimize potential prostate AR activity be a benefit?
How am I a fraud when I am not claiming to be anything?
Oh wait... You are going back to the "DEFLECT PERSONAL ATTACKS CHANGE SUBJECT MAKE HUMOROUS COMMENTS" motto..
CBS you can't support an argument. And yes, I got banned because I was discussing a topic.
Nobody was able to really refute or answer so a ban was most appropriate. It's the same type of behavior you do. "I CAN'T ANSWER THIS DEFLECT/BAN"
http://forums.steroid.com/hormone-replacement-therapy-low-testosterone-treatment-anti-aging/519006-trenbolone-hrt-better-than-testosterone.html
Keep talking I can't keep up. I will jump in on another thread were a topic is being discussed.