Now come on, he has provided evidence for his claim / claims. You are expecting a smoking gun and unfortunately that doesn't happen on the internet very often. You feel the evidence he provided is insufficient, like the HPLC machine discrepancy, etc.
That's fine, but you made a claim with ZERO evidence saying he faked MS / HPLC's. That is hardly comparable, your actions are far more egregious in this case.
It is ridiculous to expect someone to disprove a fabricated claim and use their silence as evidence they are guilty - which is what you did with that 'fake MS' comment. See the links I provided about 'Glenn Beck raped and killed a girl in 1990' to see how ridiculous your argument is.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Negative_proof