Unfortunately, your reply does not do anything to support the claim in your article that MENT is an 'anti-androgenic progestin'. Instead, you provide a lengthy comparison of Trenbolone and MENT.
I did not claim that MENT is exactly like, or as useful as, Trenbolone. I merely mentioned Trenbolone as an example of a progestagen (=progestin) that does not have antiandrogenic effects. Since in your article, you seem to argue that MENT must be anti-androgenic since it is a progestin.
A progestin is defined as "natural or synthetic steroid hormone that binds to and activate the progesterone receptors". By this standard definition, both Trenbolone and MENT are progestins.
MENT is both a progestin and a very strong androgen. In fact, MENT has high binding affinity to the AR, and is an extremely potent activator of it, even stronger than DHT. It is as pro-androgenic as steroids get!
"
All the androgens led to a dose-dependent increase in the CAT activity. MENT was found to be the most potent followed by DHT, 19-NT, T, and CNNT. "
7alpha-methyl-19-nortestosterone, a synthetic androgen with high potency: structure-activity comparisons with other androgens - PubMed
I agree with you that MENT is not too useful as a drug due to its estrogenic and prolactinergic potential. But the claim about anti-androgenicity is simply unfounded and not needed to make a strong argument against the use of MENT.