dper726
Well-known Member
102 hours post injection bloods of 100mg watson Test C.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Watson Test-C (Domestic-Supply) - Blood Work - 2/2015 - LabCorp
- Thread starter insertnamehere
- Start date
102 hours post injection bloods of 100mg watson Test C.
dper726
Well-known Member
An AI addition to the cycle improves the case for the 7x-10x rule
These are all respected members of the community including the fact the one member whom you've gone head to head in dispute lab results are private. If it helps your case.
Again we are all metabolically different to a minor extent as healthy individuals. Hence why I wouldn't call it fully 10x but rather fall in a range near that number. I will look into more on this.
Listen I don't know where more will we go on this. We deserve the best quality possible. That should be what we attain point. We are fighting ourselves here. When it shouldn't be the case...
These are all respected members of the community including the fact the one member whom you've gone head to head in dispute lab results are private. If it helps your case.
Again we are all metabolically different to a minor extent as healthy individuals. Hence why I wouldn't call it fully 10x but rather fall in a range near that number. I will look into more on this.
Listen I don't know where more will we go on this. We deserve the best quality possible. That should be what we attain point. We are fighting ourselves here. When it shouldn't be the case...
All great data! I don't doubt some people get dose x7 or dose x10!
But please don't ignore that some people get dose x5 or dose x6, even right here on meso (out if respect I won't call them in this argument since I'm not well liked over here).
And that is my only point. TT blood level to dose correlation is not scientifically grounded. It never was! Not that blood values aren't valuable, especially when you have pharma to compare it to, but it simply isn't the hard metric that people here make it out to be.
I'll agree I've been on some arguments over here and I think it's because that is the nature of this forum.
I just don't understand where you see it on the other forums. I've met some great people and made many friends over at PHF and EVO.
I'm sorry that's your perception if me mane.
dper726
Well-known Member
I will tell you one thing.....
I have achieved the x10 therefore I know for a fact anything I test otherwise differently with will be under dosed. And this is the biggest indicator for future studies on the subject. The testing is unorganized I know for a hard conclusion. But again, science points heavy in one direction. And we should aim high at all times. Never settle with lesser value. Appreciate your body, your money, your over all health.
I will forgive you! lol!
I just think there is a better way of approaching a discussion. We all have many things in common. Juice being one of them. Death being another.
This thing about being "I am right and you are wrong" is for children. Compassion and listening goes a long way to having people listen to you (and no, I did not smoke a joint prior too typing that). It creates real strength and deeper understanding (maybe I did smoke one).
So we are good in my book. Believe me, I know it's easy to get caught up in "I know I am right" bullshit. I've done it many times in this life. And sometimes I am right. Amazing.
Back to the OP here, the dose X7.5 on the watson did not disappoint me. It was the fact that OP has a history of scoring x10 on pharma TRT and that this watson did not get him there.
When it comes down to it, Test E and C are so cheap that there is no good reason for UGL's to see under dosed gear. When we do get our hands on fully dosed UGL gear we should not be anymore confident that it's not tainted with whatever nasty shit China leaves behind than with weak under dosed gear.
I would FUCKING LOVE to find a SRC for real Watson, and would gladly drop hundo every time for a vial of real american pharma test.
When it comes down to it, Test E and C are so cheap that there is no good reason for UGL's to see under dosed gear. When we do get our hands on fully dosed UGL gear we should not be anymore confident that it's not tainted with whatever nasty shit China leaves behind than with weak under dosed gear.
I would FUCKING LOVE to find a SRC for real Watson, and would gladly drop hundo every time for a vial of real american pharma test.
I doubt you are alone on that Burrr. I'm sure most people would jump at it gladly, but now we have tons of fake watson floating around as well. Counterfeits are always a bad deal in my opinion, even when they have legit gear in them. I would say the same thing about any counterfeit product whether it was a rolex, a car part, or aas. At least a fake rolex wouldn't possibly give you bitch tits though.
olivela
New Member
So DS is underdosed or just plain boo boo..
I think it's inconclusive. not enough data to convince me it's real..... or fake
olivela
New Member
Well fuck I was thinking of using him due to the fact it's domestic.. but so far all I see is mixed thoughts...
olivela
New Member
Nvm lol I read on... fuck
bmanstrong
New Member
If counterfeiting Watson was so easy, why not counterfeit Perrigo too? Why stop at Watson? Taking counterfeit Watson for 6 weeks and your numbers are only off by 300 points? That is still within the margin of error. If it was bunk your T would have been way lower than 900. You said yourself that you felt great. Anyone on prescription TRT who gets blood test regularly knows that numbers fluctuate even after setting a baseline. I've been on prescription TRT for almost two years. 150 mg a week gets me over 1000. 100mg a week gets me 700. So your number of 120mg getting you 900 sounds right. I'm 5' 7 200lbs. You have guys on here who are on prescription Watson saying they can't find any difference in bottle or box.
Last edited:
insertnamehere
New Member
Probably because Watson is one of the worlds most recognized brand names.
If you were to go off percentage, this blood work using the Watson, came back at 25% less than the bottom value of my established range on prescription testosterone. Not 25% less than the high end, not 25% less than the middle, but 25% less than the bottom.
A 20% swing in either direction is possible but a 25% decline from the bottom value of my established range is highly unlikely.
Based on this evidence and the fact that I lost a little strength and had acne show up during that time, I'm inclined to believe it is not authentic Watson.
This Watson will be tested using MS/HPLC. We'll see what those test results have to say.
Thanks for stopping by.
bmanstrong
New Member
Thanks man, I'm new to this board. Any idea when tests are due?
insertnamehere
New Member
Hopefully sooner than later but as of right now, there is no scheduled date for the results.
I'll update this thread when I have more information.
I'll update this thread when I have more information.
Cody wing
New Member
Hey guys I know I'm brand new to this forum and honestly I'm brand new to this whole thing to begin with! But I just ordered 5 vials of DS Watson test! I have low T and my doc is being an ass and not treating me properly! So here I go I'm gonna try his Watson test and see if it works well or not! I also purchased some of his ovigil HCG and nolva I'll keep yall posted about results and how I feel while on it! Here's to hoping its at least quality UGL and that I didn't waste 600 bucks for nothing
Cody wing
New Member
I have not received my package as of yet! But I had a tracking number within a day and he shipped my package on the same day! Customer service was awesome but this all means nothing unless the products actually work!
insertnamehere
New Member
Cody wing
New Member
Haha okay. Now how do I make my own thread..haha
