Western-BioTech - Pharma quality GH

Your right he didn't post it. It was confirmed by the person conducted the test him via email. Are u calling mands a liar? Or he just made up the 99.5 purity ? So Jim what kind if dr. Are you If u don't mind me asking?

Really have you ever heard of the term PRELIMINARY DATA ???
 
Why don't you post a poll doc? Have people read that post and vote whether or not you are stating that you believe mands test showed that GH was present.
I see what you mean by the wording in the first part of that quote, but the whole second part is him stating the fact that without extensive testing there is no way to know for sure if its rHGH.
Which is the main issue with generics and its been discussed many times in other threads.
 
you gotta be kidding , i know alot of buisness people and i dont know anyone thay would spend millions to make black market gh, any idiot could think of a better investment to put millions of dollors in than making black market gh , the idea that any of you would believe this is ridiculous .
 
So let me make sure I got this right dr? Mands sends off a sample to confirm its gh and the lab does a series of tests. Tells mands yes it is gh and it's 99.5 purity and then tells him it has 20iu. And you want to dispute the guy who did this testing. How about we get him to speak with u? Bet u won't look that smart seeing as he tests this shit for a living works in a lab and well, we really don't know what you do or who u are or what credentials u have other than u put a Dr. In front of your name with no proof u are an md what so ever. Doc!
 
I see what you mean by the wording in the first part of that quote, but the whole second part is him stating the fact that without extensive testing there is no way to know for sure if its rHGH.
Which is the main issue with generics and its been discussed many times in other threads.

Also, if you look around the same page; lightspan also acknowledged that what mands tested is GH as well. You guys aren't suggesting that lightspan is wrong? He seems much more knowledgeable then the so-called doc in this area.
 
Also, if you look around the same page; lightspan also acknowledged that what mands tested is GH as well. You guys aren't suggesting that lightspan is wrong? He seems much more knowledgeable then the so-called doc in this area.

So your a man in the know now,, lol!
 
I see what you mean by the wording in the first part of that quote, but the whole second part is him stating the fact that without extensive testing there is no way to know for sure if its rHGH.
Which is the main issue with generics and its been discussed many times in other threads.

Mands tests proved beyond any doubt that the material is GH, and it's purity is 99.5%, if you like me to ask a summery from my professor I will post it, anyhow Mands clearly got back with this statement from the university,

Everything else is less then laughable, only claim which was raised and may be true theoretically is that I rebottled pharma grade GH, but Mands sample contained GH of 99.5% purity, and other statement is a sheer lie,

If I rebottled 15000iu of GH and do it aghain then the joke is on me and actually on u if u believe it, but this is another issue, in this forum anyone may make any claim even if more then ridiculous (refer to the one which doubt that MAnds tested GH), no one monitor shits, it has of course good and bad consequences, and very interesting by itself, but it's also the only reason the doc is hiding here and was kicked from any other place ...
 
Also, if you look around the same page; lightspan also acknowledged that what mands tested is GH as well. You guys aren't suggesting that lightspan is wrong? He seems much more knowledgeable then the so-called doc in this area.
I never said, nor do I have the intention of saying Anyone is wrong. I was just giving my opinion of the quote you posted of Dr.Jim's.
 
Mands tests proved beyond any doubt that the material is GH, and it's purity is 99.5%, if you like me to ask a summery from my professor I will post it, anyhow Mands clearly got back with this statement from the university,

Everything else is less then laughable, only claim which was raised and may be true theoretically is that I rebottled pharma grade GH, but Mands sample contained GH of 99.5% purity, and other statement is a sheer lie,

If I rebottled 15000iu of GH and do it aghain then the joke is on me and actually on u if u believe it, but this is another issue, in this forum anyone may make any claim even if more then ridiculous (refer to the one which doubt that MAnds tested GH), no one monitor shits, it has of course good and bad consequences, and very interesting by itself, but it's also the only reason the doc is hiding here and was kicked from any other place ...

EVIDENCE!!'
 
Guys Dr Jim already stated again and I'll quote "However based on my experience I would say it's much more likely than not your sample was GH."

So I don't know why you are still asking him?

mands
 
I never said, nor do I have the intention of saying Anyone is wrong. I was just giving my opinion of the quote you posted of Dr.Jim's.


Seems reasonable to me, but understand Z some of Meso's more recent member quests are from a censored board called Pro Muscle.

See at that den of inequality "broism" rules and all others MUST tow that party line!
 
I'll do the IGF-1 test guys! Give me two weeks as I am seeing my doctor for regular labs.

If you want me to just get a privatemd lab one I'm sure I can next week! If this can't wait.

Let me know.

mands
 
Guys Dr Jim already stated again and I'll quote "However based on my experience I would say it's much more likely than not your sample was GH."

So I don't know why you are still asking him?

mands


I think it's bc "they" don't like my message!
 
Actually ur as good at evading questions as you accuse karl of jim. Oops dr. Jim . You tow lines of of wording to be evasive u know good and well the testing is more than preliminary data. You just want to be an ass. So how's the office today? Lots of patients ?
 
I'm confused, a mass spec test was ran right? Which gives you molecule weight.

Was a test performed to show it was properly sequenced? Because a peptide/proteins sequence is what is important, if the amino acids aren't in the correct order then its fold will be incorrect.
 
Back
Top