you want a proof, here is a proof fake test

When it comes to all of the technical know how, you’re right - I have nothing to say. When it comes to common sense and other things, we could discuss things further.

Jano is ALWAYS right? Was he right when he completely faked reports for @mands? What did he do over at BoP to get himself banned if he is always right? ALWAYS right is quite the stretch.


what has one thing to do with another ?

Being smart and be able to provide logically supported arguments with proof. Have you been able to write a single coherent sentence about chemistry and analysis which would make sense ?

On other hand if he messed up something with testing is an another matter not related to way he is handing arguments. Maybe he messed up something but on other hand provided valuable testing services to others.
 
so that dipshit @mercury shows up in a thread, spouting off a bunch of dumb bullshit, and you guys decided to argue with each other, instead of remembering all you have to do is remember that @mercury is nothing but a shill for labmax and is to be ignored. I can't figure out for the life of me what you guys are arguing about
 
what has one thing to do with another ?

Being smart and be able to provide logically supported arguments with proof. Have you been able to write a single coherent sentence about chemistry and analysis which would make sense ?

On other hand if he messed up something with testing is an another matter not related to way he is handing arguments. Maybe he messed up something but on other hand provided valuable testing services to others.
Messed up? How about straight up lied and fabricated, you fucking idiot?
 
Messed up? How about straight up lied and fabricated, you fucking idiot?

maybe you can show valid diploma what education you have and your IQ before continuing the discussion

your each sentence is short on argument and lacks coherence which makes it difficult to continue.
 
maybe you can show valid diploma what education you have and your IQ before continuing the discussion

your each sentence is short on argument and lacks coherence which makes it difficult to continue.
Only a simple minded idiot would think that sentence is incoherent. Is Engish your first or second language? Look at your stupid sentence and how you titled this thread: “you want a proof...” it would be “You want proof?” Fucking idiot.
 
Only a simple minded idiot would think that sentence is incoherent. Is Engish your first or second language? Look at your stupid sentence and how you titled this thread: “you want a proof...” it would be “You want proof?” Fucking idiot.

your arguments and the way you handle discussion is really amazing.

how old are you 5 ?
 
your arguments and the way you handle discussion is really amazing.

how old are you 5 ?
Lol, you’re one to talk. You talk a whole bunch of shit about people and their incoherent sentences and write like a moron or a foreigner yourself. My guess would be you’re a foreigner. Either way, ignoring your bitch ass is long overdue.
 
If you could do it in a meme, that'd be great. Something with Joe Biden creepily sniffing lab results could work. Its soooo hot right now.
I'm on it.

RTS21I4Y-e1554243147939.jpg


...as long as I don't get too frustrated with the touchpad.
 
I don't give a shit about what people around here think - you could have gathered that by now. If I did that I could have stayed quiet.
You can’t stay quite one way or the other. I’ve definitely gathered that by now lol.
I actually think you are very knowledgeable and could be a great asset here with your posts. Your testing service on the other hand will always be questionable here. You know why, you owned up to it, and it is what it is.

Why does it also look like you have a vendetta here? Is it because you were outted by @mands ? Is it to get back at this board for something? Do you just like attention good or bad?
You always seem to be right in the middle of controversy. Why is that? Is it everyone else? Or is it just you!?
 
Tough words.

You should be embarrassed about getting on a high horse when you ultimately don't know jack shit.

Also mind that my point is entirely different different than that of Mercury, but ultimately leading to the same conclusion. Don't fall for fallacy that when you disprove his arguments you disprove mine as well.

1. It's not a reference standard. Reference standard is not just anything that contains the said chemical, but it has to fulfill specific requirements.

2. If you imply I don't know what Sigma is, go fuck yourself. There's picture of a real reference GH standard purchased through them with my name on it somewhere here on this forum.

3. HGH form HEK cells appears when you search HGH on Sigmas search engine on a very convenient first spot. Something you'd choose if you knew very little about naming conventions. Real standards come up when you look up Somatropin.

View attachment 109072

4. Why would anybody purchase HEK expressed GH "standard" if REAL standards costs less than that (EU Ph. cca. 4 mg) or just a little more (USP cca. 4 mg)?

5. Now, if you take a good fucking look at the Sigma's page for HEK HGH you notice it's godfuckingdamn 10 micrograms.

6. Now take a look at the report, where the peak for the sample ( 4 mg GH ) and the "standard" ( 0.01 mg ) don't look that different. Kinda weird for a linear relationship isn't it? Or are you going to imply that the sample was dissolved in at the very least half a liter of water?


Who's fucking worthless now, Mr. Engineer?

Congratulations on figuring that shit out smart guy.

Now insult my intelligence again, I dare you. What's your response, if you can comprehend these simple facts?

Despite my personal opinion about Jano, I have to give credit where it’s due.You clearly have a strong command over logical reasoning, and you unequivocally know your area of expertise.

Notwithstanding, what I find most interesting is that @mercury actually “like”ed a post from Jano!

What’s worse, a crook or a hypocrite?
 
You can’t stay quite one way or the other. I’ve definitely gathered that by now lol.
I actually think you are very knowledgeable and could be a great asset here with your posts. Your testing service on the other hand will always be questionable here. You know why, you owned up to it, and it is what it is.

Why does it also look like you have a vendetta here? Is it because you were outted by @mands ? Is it to get back at this board for something? Do you just like attention good or bad?
You always seem to be right in the middle of controversy. Why is that? Is it everyone else? Or is it just you!?
If you don't think me calling out questionable data is being an asset, then I don't know what is. Would you care to explain what could I do other than pointing out discrepancies that only I can notice at first sight, due to hundreds of hours of experience with exactly that kind of tests?

Because I don't see how calling out this shit is good for me or my business, having to deal with retards that will waste my time with bullshit and not address my actual arguments at all. Hell, that's the reason why I didn't post about this shit the second I saw those GH reports.

I'm tired of retards that have nothing else to do than jerk themselves off because they can join the witch hunt on an internet forum, giving their life a meaning and a pat on the back from "vets." And you have to admit that's what some of the loudest haters on me are.

On the other hand spreading awareness about discrepancy in data is good for people here, so they can be wary of something being wrong. So, what exactly is like a vendetta about that?

Please, explain it to me like I'm five.

Despite my personal opinion about Jano, I have to give credit where it’s due.You clearly have a strong command over logical reasoning, and you unequivocally know your area of expertise.

I'm flattered, thank you.

Talking about likes, you notice that the guy I'm replying to, who is provably wrong, gathered a whole lot more of them despite lacking expertise, admitting it and fucking up. Sad, is it not?

It's a pity that the person whom I replied to in that post didn't find it in him to be a man enough to apologize, or at least admit being wrong. Can't really expect much around here.

Right, happy little Sherlock Fucking Holmes @Mac11wildcat?
 
If you don't think me calling out questionable data is being an asset, then I don't know what is. Would you care to explain what could I do other than pointing out discrepancies that only I can notice at first sight, due to hundreds of hours of experience with exactly that kind of tests?

Because I don't see how calling out this shit is good for me or my business, having to deal with retards that will waste my time with bullshit and not address my actual arguments at all. Hell, that's the reason why I didn't post about this shit the second I saw those GH reports.

I'm tired of retards that have nothing else to do than jerk themselves off because they can join the witch hunt on an internet forum, giving their life a meaning and a pat on the back from "vets." And you have to admit that's what some of the loudest haters on me are.

On the other hand spreading awareness about discrepancy in data is good for people here, so they can be wary of something being wrong. So, what exactly is like a vendetta about that?

Please, explain it to me like I'm five.



I'm flattered, thank you.

Talking about likes, you notice that the guy I'm replying to, who is provably wrong, gathered a whole lot more of them despite lacking expertise, admitting it and fucking up. Sad, is it not?

It's a pity that the person whom I replied to in that post didn't find it in him to be a man enough to apologize, or at least admit being wrong. Can't really expect much around here.

Right, happy little Sherlock Fucking Holmes @Mac11wildcat?
Awwww poor Rat....
download.jpeg.jpg
 
That's not how it works. You need instrumentation validation and calibration curves.
Hello Doug,
I really hoped you'd show up at some point. Don't think there's anybody here more qualified to talk about real accredited facilities than you.
 
Back
Top