Oh the irony.

I voted conservative in our last election, but please do carry on with your armchair psychology.

"Voted conservative in our last election"

Well, if that's truly the case, you're the first conservative voting "goober" I've ever met to talk so positively/favorably about socialism.

I meet all types here, apparently!
 
"Voted conservative in our last election"

Well, if that's truly the case, you're the first conservative voting "goober" I've ever met to talk so positively/favorably about socialism.

I meet all types here, apparently!
Do I support socialism as Karl Marx envisioned it? No. Absolutely not. It’s not sustainable

Do I support socialism in the context of making sure that people don’t starve and ensuing that essential services receive the funding that they need to run properly by virtue of being public services and thereby getting funding through tax revenues? Absolutely.

I also don’t support unfettered capitalism, but I realize that it’s the best economic opinion that we currently have available to us. It requires regulation, though, or the world would eat itself.

As I’ve said repeatedly, neither are “yes or no” concepts. They’re sliding scales, not dichotomies.
 
Dude, for being such a tiny country in comparison Uruguay has a GDP 1.5 times higher than China's. The only reason China's export business is comparable is due to the fact the world outsources their products to be made there due to cheap labor. They're a shithole and they make crap that doesn't last.

Nice try. Speaking of China, does anyone remember the chain of suicides that made headlines due to workers assembling your gadgets like smartphones, etc were being worked to death in what are basically concentration camp like settings?

Life and death in Apple’s forbidden city

^ Hate to break it to you but you won't be able to dismiss that source since it's not a right-wing conservative funded site. Just letting you know beforehand.
None of what you said takes away that one calls itself communist and one calls itself socialist and both are considered successful.

Are you a flat earther by chance?
 
I'm a centrist
None of what you said takes away that one calls itself communist and one calls itself socialist and both are considered successful.

Are you a flat earther by chance?

If you're insinuating that China, a communist country, is successful because of communism you are either being dishonest or are flat out ignorant. Back in 1990, ninety percent of China was living below the poverty level. The only reason why China is prospering now is due to foreign investments led by the US (which falls under capitalism, by the way; not communism). And then there's the billions China has received from the US, along with other countries in foreign aid.

Why not look back at China's communistic history that claimed the lives of

Also, Uruguay doesn't call itself a socialist country. It's a democratic republic with a mixed economy.
 
The only reason why China is prospering now is due to foreign investments

What you mean is that the first world outsourced all of our manufacturing jobs to there to make a quick buck and their economy is flourishing because of it.

You could make the argument that their structured economy has helped them leverage their exploding manufacturing sector more efficiently, but the period in time that China was actually communist was a low point for them whether you measure it in economic strength or in human suffering.
 
I'm a centrist, by the way. Not that labels mean anything to you since you always take it upon yourself to change the definition of terms to fit your fallacious argumentation style. What's truly idiotic is to call China's communism a success. Do some history research on China's history and how tens of millions of Chinese people starved to death or were murdered under the true tenets of communism. Would you have called it a success back then?
 
What you mean is that the first world outsourced all of our manufacturing jobs to there to make a quick buck and their economy is flourishing because of it.

You could make the argument that their structured economy has helped them leverage their exploding manufacturing sector more efficiently, but the period in time that China was actually communist was a low point for them by any measure, be it economic strength or human suffering.

Oh, yes. Outsourcing truy does upset a hardcore socialist. I can see how upset and fuming you are over it. LOL!

Dude, you're a Marxist advocating internet troll trying to spread your agenda through online forums. I have been on other sites with forums of all types and there always people like you spreading bullshit. Trying so hard to make capitalism look evil and glorifying "socialism" through covert means.
 
Oh, yes. Outsourcing truy does upset a hardcore socialist. I can see how upset and fuming you are over it. LOL!

Dude, you're a Marxist advocating internet troll trying to spread your agenda through online forums. I have been on other sites with forums of all types and there always people like you spreading bullshit. Trying so hard to make capitalism look evil and glorifying "socialism" through covert means.

Have you been day-drinking?

Did you skim over the part where I said that I don’t support Marxist socialism because it’s not sustainable? It’s pretty hard to be a Marxist that doesn’t believe in Marxism.

Did you also skim over where I said that China’s communist period was a low point?

Either you’re responding to the wrong person or you’re out to lunch.
 
Have you been day-drinking?

Did you skim over the part where I said that I don’t support Marxist socialism because it’s not sustainable? It’s pretty hard to be a Marxist that doesn’t believe in Marxism.

Did you also skim over where I said that China’s communist period was a low point?

Either you’re responding to the wrong person or you’re out to lunch.
bwahahhahahahhah
 
Have you been day-drinking?

Did you skim over the part where I said that I don’t support Marxist socialism because it’s not sustainable? It’s pretty hard to be a Marxist that doesn’t believe in Marxism.

Did you also skim over where I said that China’s communist period was a low point?

Either you’re responding to the wrong person or you’re out to lunch.
Damn that's a good burn right there! Dude's brain must been out to lunch and late getting back to work LOL.
 
Admittedly, I did confuse your dribble with your tittied friend Regular-Joe. After all, you both excel at insults to get your point across. And now here comes
Damn that's a good burn right there! Dude's brain must been out to lunch and late getting back to work LOL.

That's rich coming from the site's bottom feeder with the word "Mindless" in his profile name.

Admittedly, I did confuse Test-Subject's dribble with his bare tittied friend Regular-Joe's pro-socialist comments. There's not much distinction to be made between different users on this site when their main strength is personal attacks. They all start sounding like the same person.

Never in a million years would I have thought that my anti-socialism stance would make steroid users on a steroid site so worked up. :cool:
 
Admittedly, I did confuse your dribble with your tittied friend Regular-Joe. After all, you both excel at insults to get your point across. And now here comes


That's rich coming from the site's bottom feeder with the word "Mindless" in his profile name.

Admittedly, I did confuse Test-Subject's dribble with his bare tittied friend Regular-Joe's pro-socialist comments. There's not much distinction to be made between different users on this site when their main strength is personal attacks. They all start sounding like the same person.

Never in a million years would I have thought that my anti-socialism stance would make steroid users on a steroid site so worked up. :cool:
Lol I feel so flattered now and thanks for your feedback man...much appreciated hearing from you!

A little backstory to my nick: I once worked as an IT service desk agent, and taking the same sort of calls every darn day and doing the same solutions which to me was mindless work..thus the nickname.
 
Admittedly, I did confuse your dribble with your tittied friend Regular-Joe. After all, you both excel at insults to get your point across. And now here comes


That's rich coming from the site's bottom feeder with the word "Mindless" in his profile name.

Admittedly, I did confuse Test-Subject's dribble with his bare tittied friend Regular-Joe's pro-socialist comments. There's not much distinction to be made between different users on this site when their main strength is personal attacks. They all start sounding like the same person.

Never in a million years would I have thought that my anti-socialism stance would make steroid users on a steroid site so worked up. :cool:
Don't flatter yourself brah, no one gives a flying fuck about your stance towards socialism. Do they like pointing out what they see as flaws in your reasoning? For sure brah.
 
Jesus, you guys certainly do live on this site, don't you? I've been away for a few days because, unlike most of you here in this thread, I have an actual life. I post when I can and there you guys are; responding to me in seconds.
 
Jesus, you guys certainly do live on this site, don't you? I've been away for a few days because, unlike most of you here in this thread, I have an actual life. I post when I can and there you guys are; responding to me in seconds.
Jesus you are a bitch. You griped about getting a response in seconds and you respond within seconds.
Why don't you go fuck yourself you hypocrite, no one gives a shit about you or your faggot "life"
 
^ Claims not to give a shit yet is always there responding back to me. By the way, you added nothing of value to this thread. Other than your "people are selfish! Woe is me!!" rant. Hope that made you feel better after having gotten that off your chest.
 
^ Claims not to give a shit yet is always there responding back to me. By the way, you added nothing of value to this thread. Other than your "people are selfish! Woe is me!!" rant. Hope that made you feel better after having gotten that off your chest.
Why the snark? You calling me the bottom feeder when you are one...the irony!
 
Back
Top