Russia begins invasion of Ukraine

Like a petulant child you just can't be put to sleep lol.

You just can't handle it can you Paul?

You're a dumbfuxk. A tool, a fool.

You support this idiot
Screenshot_20220613-165456~2.png

Whose a bigger threat to your liberty than any broke assed backwoods asiatic or corrupt Eastern European ogliarchy ever dreamed of being.

And you cheer for this malevolent bastard.

You support, the same people who've been fucking you over for years.

This guy literally took millions of dollars in bribes from the very people he's now sending billions of taxpayers dollars to to fight a war Americans have no interest in whatsoever.

Screenshot_20221024-151001~2.png


And your only fucked up reply is

Screenshot_20221210-093702~2.png


Joe Biden is a bigger threat to democracy and American liberty than "Putin" ever dreamed of.

And you cheer this lying corrupt bastard on while thousands of men, better than you die every day because of that bastards greed.

I don't give a fuck what you think Paul.

You're an ignorant wretch. A despicable grotesque of inconceivable stupidity. A disappointment and a useful f-n idiot.
 
"NATO as an organization has had a couple small bombing campaigns in Yugoslavia and Libya (UN resolutions 713 and 1973) but other than that nothing offensive". - quote from a lying bitch calls himself @hometeam

Truth is, were still learning about those NATO atrocities as the lies fall to facts as the time goes by.

Read it and judge for yourself about this "small insignificant bombing campaign" done by a "purely defensive alliance"

And see a lying bitch for what he is.

 
"NATO as an organization has had a couple small bombing campaigns in Yugoslavia and Libya (UN resolutions 713 and 1973) but other than that nothing offensive". - quote from a lying bitch calls himself @hometeam
Yes, NATO bombed Kosovo from 24 March 1999 to 10 June 1999, so 47 days. Then UN peacekeepers went in and kept the peace, policed the area. And that's ancient history. The next time NATO has an offensive campaign you can bitch all you want but NATO in Ukraine is purely defensive now - not a single weapon given that an hit Moscow, Ukraine has had to modify a couple old Soviet drones to hit Russian airfields occasionally. So you need to bitch about Russia, the one who invaded, now or forever become a hypocrite.

You don't get to run around saying NATO committed atrocities 20 years ago and is terrible for doing what the international community wanted but Russia was provoked and what they're doing is right now today as we speak (killing 8,300 to 33,407 civilians) is acceptable without being called out for it.
 
Last edited:
Yes, NATO bombed Kosovo from 24 March 1999 to 10 June 1999, so 47 days. Then UN peacekeepers went in and kept the peace, policed the area. And that's ancient history. The next time NATO has an offensive campaign you can bitch all you want but NATO in Ukraine is purely defensive now - not a single weapon given that an hit Moscow, Ukraine has had to modify a couple old Soviet drones to hit Russian airfields occasionally. So you need to bitch about Russia, the one who invaded, now or forever become a hypocrite.

You don't get to run around saying NATO committed atrocities 20 years ago and is terrible for doing what the international community wanted but Russia was provoked and what they're doing is right now today as we speak (killing 8,300 to 33,407 civilians) is acceptable without being called out for it.


Biden escalating war in somalia.

Because, you know, it's all about peace. Especially after the US state department coups.

Perpetual war, all over the world, all the time.

And the stupid bastard hometeam cheers.

 
Biden escalating war in somalia.

Because, you know, it's all about peace. Especially after the US state department coups.

Perpetual war, all over the world, all the time.

And the stupid bastard hometeam cheers.

Yeah and we've never seen you condemning Russia when they do it. This was just this morning:

But it's no big deal because big bad Biden made them do it, right? Those missile defense systems we sent them which claimed to have shot down 30 of the 35 drones are grotesque and wretched, disgusting and stupid. Right?
 
Last edited:
Yeah and we've never seen you condemning Russia when they do it. This was just this morning:

But it's no big deal because big bad Biden made them do it, right? Those missile defense systems we sent them which claimed to have shot down 30 of the 35 drones are grotesque and wretched, disgusting and stupid. Right?

Lmfao.

Russian drones striking Ukrainian power plants during an active war, is the same thing as NATO bombing thousands of civilians intentionally with no provocation whatsoever?

What a dumbass
 
Lmfao.

Russian drones striking Ukrainian power plants during an active war, is the same thing as NATO bombing thousands of civilians intentionally with no provocation whatsoever?

What a dumbass
The Somalian airstrikes were on al-Shabaab, which the US has indeed been at war with since they pledged allegiance to al-Queda. Or are you trying to bring up stuff from 20+ years ago again and trying to say "what Russia is doing is ok because look at what the US did many years ago."?
 
The Somalian airstrikes were on al-Shabaab, which the US has indeed been at war with since they pledged allegiance to al-Queda. Or are you trying to bring up stuff from 20+ years ago again and trying to say "what Russia is doing is ok because look at what the US did many years ago."?

Except Al Qaeda is nothing more than the muhadeen created by the CIA and US state department to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

And Barak Obama allied the US with Al Qaeda in Syria to influence the Syrian civil war while the war in Afghanistan against Al Qaeda was still going on!

You're one dumb fuk.

You should try reading a book once in awhile instead of spewing regurgitatied CNN MSNBC bullshit propoganda

That way the stupid shit you spew would shame you instead of just making yourself look stupid.

I mean really dude. You and @Big_paul both. Paul isn't an idiot, he's just not very well informed. You're an idiot. So you should read.

Try this, it's a book they'll read to you, and it's free.
 
Last edited:
Try this, it's a book they'll read to you, and it's free.
You're recommending a book from The Libertarian Institute, written by its director. Do you honestly think this would be unbiased or of enough academic/educational value to be issued in any college setting? (I checked, it's not.)

This is straight from their website:
1671672010719.jpeg
1671671625078.jpeg
1671671642414.jpeg

You're criticizing me, a college educated guy, and Dr Michael Scally, for not reading enough books and being "dumb fuks" yet the ones you're reading are pure garbage, proudly admits to being political propaganda meant for an activism agenda, and only tells you what you want to hear as someone who agrees with the libertarian view - nothing else.
 
Last edited:
You're recommending a book from The Libertarian Institute, written by its director. Do you honestly think this would be unbiased or of enough academic/educational value to be issued in any college setting? (I checked, it's not.)

This is straight from their website:
View attachment 176942
View attachment 176940
View attachment 176941

You're criticizing me, a college educated guy, and Dr Michael Scally, for not reading enough books and being "dumb fuks" yet the ones you're reading are pure garbage, proudly admits to being political propaganda meant for an activism agenda, and only tells you what you want to hear as someone who agrees with the libertarian view - nothing else.

I guess you're afraid of the facts then.

Because facts don't change irregardless of who tells them.

That authors research is impeccable, his book is well written and factually accurate.

That's the problem with you "educated idiots" , you think you're smarter than everyone else, and your not.

It's not going to hurt you to hear an opposing view.

You just might realize how stupid you've been in this matter and what this this is all really about.

$
 
I guess you're afraid of the facts then.

Because facts don't change irregardless of who tells them.

That authors research is impeccable, his book is well written and factually accurate.

That's the problem with you "educated idiots" , you think you're smarter than everyone else, and your not.

It's not going to hurt you to hear an opposing view.

You just might realize how stupid you've been in this matter and what this this is all really about.

$
The author of your book is just some libertarian talk show host who has no credentials whatsoever.

If you really want to learn about geopolitics Alexander Stubb will be releasing a book called "Order in a World of Disorder" and he was Finland's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and is now Director and Professor of the School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy.

He's actually met Putin and negotiated peace talks with the Russians/Georgians, has a BA degree in political science from Furman University in South Carolina, has a MA degree in political science (european affairs) from the College of Europe in Belgium, and has a PhD degree in international politics from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

He talks about his upcoming book here:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7M50JGio5Q

He says the three thesis will be:
1. In the coming years a multipolar world will be led by 3 powers: China, the US, and EU who make up over 50% of world GDP and who will be challenged by an array of states, regions and non-state actors. No single center will dominate global politics.
2. China and the US will be the main rivals, they will compete but not fall into conflict and the EU will side with the US on most issues.
3.The new world order will be determined by the different power center's ability to project a combination hard, soft and smart power.

It's not a book you will read because you'd rather read libertarian trash that ignores the reality of globalism, promotes the abolishment of most (if not all) of the state and federal governments, and advocates for world powers having no involvement in geopolitics or pursuing their interests throughout the world whatsoever. That's a cause that's just not going to happen, especially after being attacked on 9/11 and especially with Russia wanting to annex European/Eurasian states.
 
You're recommending a book from The Libertarian Institute, written by its director. Do you honestly think this would be unbiased or of enough academic/educational value to be issued in any college setting? (I checked, it's not.)

This is straight from their website:
View attachment 176942
View attachment 176940
View attachment 176941

You're criticizing me, a college educated guy, and Dr Michael Scally, for not reading enough books and being "dumb fuks" yet the ones you're reading are pure garbage, proudly admits to being political propaganda meant for an activism agenda, and only tells you what you want to hear as someone who agrees with the libertarian view - nothing else.

I guess you're afraid of the facts then.

Because facts don't change irregardless of who tells them.

That authors research is impeccable, his book is well written and factually accurate.

That's the problem with you "educated idiots" , you think you're smarter than everyone else, and your not.

It's not going to hurt you to hear an opposing view
The author of your book is just some libertarian talk show host who has no credentials whatsoever.

If you really want to learn about geopolitics Alexander Stubb will be releasing a book called "Order in a World of Disorder" and he was Finland's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and is now Director and Professor of the School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy.

He's actually met Putin and negotiated peace talks with the Russians/Georgians, has a BA degree in political science from Furman University in South Carolina, has a MA degree in political science (european affairs) from the College of Europe in Belgium, and has a PhD degree in international politics from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

He talks about his upcoming book here:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7M50JGio5Q

He says the three thesis will be:
1. In the coming years a multipolar world will be led by 3 powers: China, the US, and EU who make up over 50% of world GDP and who will be challenged by an array of states, regions and non-state actors. No single center will dominate global politics.
2. China and the US will be the main rivals, they will compete but not fall into conflict and the EU will side with the US on most issues.
3.The new world order will be determined by the different power center's ability to project a combination hard, soft and smart power.

It's not a book you will read because you'd rather read libertarian trash that ignores the reality of globalism, promotes the abolishment of most (if not all) of the state and federal governments, and advocates for world powers having no involvement in geopolitics or pursuing their interests throughout the world whatsoever. That's a cause that's just not going to happen, especially after being attacked on 9/11 and especially with Russia wanting to annex European/Eurasian states.


In other words, you completely support the "new world order" and refuse to research the truth and history of these events because it contradicts your own ideals of globalist empire of billionaire corporate interests.

Because,god forbid, a libertarian point of view that all people have the right to govern themselves as they see fit prevail in contrast to the holy world empire you howl in zeal and reverence for.

What a bitch. What a punk assed braindead little punk.

In America right now, bitches like you are cheering for corporate censorship of opposition views and reasonable people who just want a government that pursues peace and prosperity for it's own citizens instead of a globalist empire.


This is clear. To anybody reading this thread, that you support the regime and it's money laundering operation in Ukraine along with the murder and death of thousands of men, better than yourself because you think it benifits your punk ass and and pads the pockets of your ruler's.

What a sleazy lowlife POS. S cowardly wretch and a bitch.

You couldn't have announced it better with a megaphone on a street corner

"Ukraine aid seems to be a good deal for the US... very affordable aid setting back the military of a dictatorship" - @hometeam

You're the punk bitch that spilled the beans right there. You don't give a fuck about the ukranian people, or the American taxpayers.

You're cheering for the Washington DC regime that making money off of all this.

And just like the bitch you are, you'll deny it all eventually
 
Last edited:
In other words, you completely support the "new world order" and refuse to research the truth and history of these events because it contradicts your own ideals of globalist empire of billionaire corporate interests.
That's why the title of the book is "Order in a World of Disorder." Would you rather have an orderly world or a disorderly one with the chaos that brings?

And with Stubb we're talking about a guy who:
  • has a BA degree in political science from Furman University in South Carolina
  • has a MA degree in political science (european affairs) from the College of Europe in Belgium
  • has a PhD degree in international politics from the London School of Economics and Political Science
  • Was Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of a country bordering Russia
vs just some Libertarian radio talk show host who wrote your book. Who do you want to be "educated" by?

While you're at it you should read Factfulness: Ten Reasons We're Wrong About the World--and Why Things Are Better Than You Think

Some reviews:
“One of the most important books I’ve ever read―an indispensable guide to thinking clearly about the world.” – Bill Gates
"Factfulness by Hans Rosling, an outstanding international public health expert, is a hopeful book about the potential for human progress when we work off facts rather than our inherent biases." - Former U.S. President Barack Obama

"In Factfulness, Professor of International Health and global TED phenomenon Hans Rosling, together with his two long-time collaborators, Anna and Ola, offers a radical new explanation of why this happens. They reveal the ten instincts that distort our perspective―from our tendency to divide the world into two camps (usually some version of us and them) to the way we consume media (where fear rules) to how we perceive progress (believing that most things are getting worse).

It turns out that the world, for all its imperfections, is in a much better state than we might think. That doesn’t mean there aren’t real concerns. But when we worry about everything all the time instead of embracing a worldview based on facts, we can lose our ability to focus on the things that threaten us most."


But no you're just so anti-capitalist, pro anarchy, and want to think the world is collapsing you won't read that either. You're stuck with only one set of biased "facts" and not learning anything other than political activist propaganda, trying to tell the rest of the world they are "uneducated dumb fuks" when you don't have the ability to distinguish a good source of information from a bad one.
 
Last edited:
The author of your book is just some libertarian talk show host who has no credentials whatsoever.

If you really want to learn about geopolitics Alexander Stubb will be releasing a book called "Order in a World of Disorder" and he was Finland's Prime Minister, Foreign Minister and is now Director and Professor of the School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy.

He's actually met Putin and negotiated peace talks with the Russians/Georgians, has a BA degree in political science from Furman University in South Carolina, has a MA degree in political science (european affairs) from the College of Europe in Belgium, and has a PhD degree in international politics from the London School of Economics and Political Science.

He talks about his upcoming book here:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7M50JGio5Q

He says the three thesis will be:
1. In the coming years a multipolar world will be led by 3 powers: China, the US, and EU who make up over 50% of world GDP and who will be challenged by an array of states, regions and non-state actors. No single center will dominate global politics.


This is obvious. Only an idiot like you would need to be told this.

The globalist corporate interests will slowly consolidate the wealth of the world into fewer and fewer hands as they rob and plunder the weaker nations one at a time until only a few are left.

Stubb's book is lame. It took that idiot all those years at university indoctrination places just to state the obvious?


2. China and the US will be the main rivals, they will compete but not fall into conflict and the EU will side with the US on most issues.
3.The new world order will be determined by the different power center's ability to project a combination hard, soft and smart power.

Lmfao. Again, stubb states the obvious. China owns most of worlds manufacturing sources, sold off by US government long ago.

Not to mention owning most of our politicians


It's not a book you will read because you'd rather read libertarian trash that ignores the reality of globalism, promotes the abolishment of most (if not all) of the state and federal governments, and advocates for world powers having no involvement in geopolitics or pursuing their interests throughout the world whatsoever. That's a cause that's just not going to happen, especially after being attacked on 9/11 and especially with Russia wanting to annex European/Eurasian states.

Yes of course, globalist powers and corporate interests are not going to stop plundering and robbing the weaker nations until none are left because....9/11 ya know, and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, dictatorships in Libya, Vietnam, Laos, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Korea, and let's not forget that megalomaniac cartoon supervillain bent on world domination in Russia as we march around the globe robbing and pillaging for such "Nobel causes"

Who did stubb say was actually bent on a path of world domination again dumb fuks? What was that about the reality of globalism again?

You're a real fkin fool hometeam. Just another educated idiot. A useful mindless bellowing tool.

You've done nothing here except copy and paste bullshit DNC talking points and propoganda.
 
Last edited:
We spent 20 years developing systems and doctrine to fight illiterate goat herders to ensure the gay pride flag can fly in the Baghdad and Kabul embassies and the daughters of the corrupt elite of both countries can learn to hate white men instead of investing in real homeland defense.

All abject failures

Now we're supposed to believe our top military strategists, like general milley and that idiot David petraues who both lied to us all for twenty years about Iraq and Afghanistan can win a proxy war in a corrupt Eastern European ogliarchy run by a rag tag group of gangsters who's only qualifications are that they that bribed Joe Biden can win a war against Russia?

Anybody buying that BS needs to consider buying a bridge I'm looking to sell
 
We may need some new material. Hardliners in Russia are talking about going after nazis in Poland next.
 

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top