Readalots Enhanced Testing

[readalot]

Test Cyp has crippling pip?

Ok, sure. It was you that missed the point. Educate yourself and maybe you would care about "isomeres".
Good luck with your pip.

 

[narta]

Ok, sure. It was you that missed the point. Educate yourself and maybe you would care about "isomeres".
Good luck with your pip.

Every time you get cornered, you get on your high horse and spew incoherent shit.

Go on, quote yourself one more time, masturbating from the high you get when you get a notification.

 

[readalot]

Every time you get cornered, you get on your high horse and spew incoherent shit.

Go on, quote yourself one more time, masturbating from the high you get when you get a notification.

Cornered? Not at all. You stated "isomeres [sic]" only occur in Test E raws; I corrected you. You switched to the PIP issue and then stated it is unknown what is causing it.

Not a very good faith summary of our conversation you provided, is it?

 

[readalot]

Would you like to pitch in with me to answer the -ene variant question on the Test ester raws? You been following that? Thoughts?

Test E is the only raw that suffers from that.

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

Wait for it...

Test Cyp has crippling pip? Since when?

You are helpless...

Test E has crippling pip for some reason, maybe because they changed the procedure. So everyone goes for Test C nowdays. You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about some isomere in Test C.

DOES Test C have crippling pip like Test E? Yes or No? I don't fucking care about isomeres.

Since lab results somehow reflect a user's post injection pain.

Jano has no clue what's causing the Test E shenanigans. Nothing can be extrapolated from testing. It's probably some obscure residue that can't be quantified and probably it becomes a literal pain in the ass as time passes for production date.

Ok, sure. It was you that missed the point. Educate yourself and maybe you would care about "isomeres".
Good luck with your pip.

Every time you get cornered, you get on your high horse and spew incoherent shit.

Go on, quote yourself one more time, masturbating from the high you get when you get a notification.

Reading back through it is rather pointless to continue to try and dialogue in good faith with you further. There is a pattern that keeps repeating. "Good faith". Look it up.

 

[readalot]

You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about some isomere in Test C.

Whoops, should have put this one in there too.

Have a great week.

 

[narta]

There is a pattern that keeps repeating.

This is accurate.

For the foreseeable future you can royally fuck off for all I care.

 

[readalot]

This is accurate.

For the foreseeable future you can royally fuck off for all I care.

It is rather pointless to try to earnestly discuss these topics with you when you employ your bullshit tactics.

Or maybe I just need to up my androgen dose to erode more of my critical thinking ability when I converse with you here.

Hmm. Nah, I'm good.

 

[bigMoJo]

It's an experiment of sorts, I guess, and Narta said he can see it fail.
He may be right in thinking that, like you. The audience is not there.

Personally, I think you already know I'm in support of the additional testing and potentially increased "quality" of products, if possible.

However, I'm considering both viewpoints, just like you...

Tbh, I have been listening to both sides of the discussion and they both bring good points.

In this instance, two identical products are unnecessarily competing against each other. That simply does not make any business sense. It doesn't mean that's the "end all." But, shouldn't we discuss it?

I see a vendor from another board has started a "premium" line—it has it's own "batch #" throughout the test results. That's good! That may be all that's needed to differentiate products enough to overcome this "hurdle." What else can help?

Nevertheless, I don't think it's a good idea—if questions arise—they are "side-stepped," "ignored," "over-looked," and the like... it conveys an elitist, obstinate and doltish perspective.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Jano has no clue what's causing the Test E shenanigans. Nothing can be extrapolated from testing. It's probably some obscure residue that can't be quantified and probably it becomes a literal pain in the ass as time passes for production date.

We can't solve it, so we go to the alternatives, Test C and I am going to experiment with Test Iso, that's in theory a medium hl ester with high concentration capabilities

For sure. Idk even know what this guy is talking about with test c pip.

 

[readalot]

Idk even know what this guy is talking about with test c pip

Do you regularly partake in other rec drugs?

I don't ignore folks on here but you two are definitely worthy. WITAF, lol.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Do you regularly partake in other rec drugs?

I don't ignore folks on here but you two are definitely worthy. WITAF, lol.

Nah, it's hard to keep up with your nonsense you post on here.


Still haven't mentioned the talk of test c creating crippling pip.


You are definitely one of the biggest jokes here, ROFL

 

[readalot]

Still haven't mentioned the talk of test c creating crippling pip.

I surely did not. Keep rolling.

Reading comprehension ain't a commodity on an AAS forum. I understand. Be/get well.

Solid contributor on this thread. Appreciate it.

 

[readalot]

ROFL

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 5:57 AM

Would you like to pitch in with me to answer the -ene variant question on the Test ester raws? You been following that? Thoughts?

Test E is the only raw that suffers from that.

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

Wait for it...

Test Cyp has crippling pip? Since when?

You are helpless...

Test E has crippling pip for some reason, maybe because they changed the procedure. So everyone goes for Test C nowdays. You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about...

• readalot

• 

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 6:00 AM

You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about some isomere in Test C.

Whoops, should have put this one in there too.

Have a great week.

• readalot

• 

Don't say later I didn't try.

 

[readalot]

Needs a sticky on this forum.

Willful Ignorance and Self-Deception

Are you fooling yourself on purpose or unconsciously?

www.psychologytoday.com

What Is Willful Ignorance & 5 Examples of How It Works - Learning Mind

This exploration of common examples of willful ignorance in everyday life makes it clear that it is somewhat of a double-edged sword. What is it?

www.learning-mind.com

Or why AAS will never break free from its chains to rec/street drugs.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 5:57 AM

Would you like to pitch in with me to answer the -ene variant question on the Test ester raws? You been following that? Thoughts?

Test E is the only raw that suffers from that.

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

Wait for it...

Test Cyp has crippling pip? Since when?

You are helpless...

Test E has crippling pip for some reason, maybe because they changed the procedure. So everyone goes for Test C nowdays. You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about...

• readalot

• 

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 6:00 AM

You asked my input and when I gave it, you insist on posting irrelevant shit about some isomere in Test C.

Whoops, should have put this one in there too.

Have a great week.

• readalot

• 

Don't say later I didn't try.

Where is the subjective data that shows that Test C is causing Post injection PAIN?

 

[readalot]

Where is the subjective data that shows that Test C is causing Post injection PAIN?

I'll let someone else try to get it through to you. I never said anything about Test C causing PIP. Another hallucination. But I know, you don't have time to read all the info I laid out for you.

I guess a variant of this...

Denying the antecedent - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Switching the antecedent rather than ignoring it.

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Sunday at 4:24 PM

Uh, no. The work described in this very thread indicates Test Cyp also same issue.

Thanks for your reply.

Test Cyp has crippling pip? Since when?

• narta

• 

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

I'll let someone else try to get it through to you. I never said anything about Test C causing PIP. Another hallucination. But I know, you don't have time to read all the info I laid out for you.

You were asked when test c caused crippling pip, you responded with your tests

You are such a joke dude

 

[readalot]

You were asked when test c caused crippling pip, you responded with your tests

You are such a joke dude

See above, take a deep breath, and try to understand the error of logic Narta made.

You guys need to drop the doses. Reasoning ability affected. Seriously.

 

[readalot]

You are such a joke dude

Post in thread 'Readalots Enhanced Testing'

Monday at 5:50 AM

Every time you get cornered, you get on your high horse and spew incoherent shit.

Go on, quote yourself one more time, masturbating from the high you get when you get a notification.

Cornered? Not at all. You stated "isomeres [sic]" only occur in Test E raws; I corrected you. You switched to the PIP issue and then stated it is unknown what is causing it.

Not a very good faith summary of our conversation you provided, is it?

• readalot

• 

Thanks.

If I didn't know better I'd think you guys are purposely trying to derail the thread. No worries.

 

[RekTest]

Quite the interesting back and forth…. Im scratching my head reading this lol