A million illegals DID vote in this election - maybe many more

So, turns out that Trump was on the right track when he made those comments about illegals participating in the election on a large scale.

When you read the below article, consider how many non-citizens either declined to participate in this study or falsely said they didn't vote? Seriously, who in their right mind admits to violating (a potentially serious offense) the law during a phone call with a stranger? Could very well be that Trump's estimate is not far off the mark at all.

I've changed the color of a portion to blue - this is "funny" since liberals have been fighting tooth and nail for years to block voter ID, and also pushed through Motor Voter laws everywhere. Now we know why...

*****

Trump argument bolstered: Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times - Thursday, January 26, 2017

Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud.


Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion.

Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.

Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes.

“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,” Mr. Richman wrote. “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”

Still, the finding is significant because it means noncitizens may have helped Mrs. Clinton carry a state or finish better than she otherwise would have.

Mr. Trump’s unverified accusation to congressional leaders this week, as reported by The Washington Post, has sent the issue skyward.

He apparently was referring to all types of fraud, such as the “dead” voting or multiple votes from the same person. But the thrust of his estimate appears to be that illegal immigrants and noncitizens carried the popular vote.

He returned to the issue Thursday in Philadelphia, where he spoke to congressional Republicans mapping this year’s legislative calendar.

“We also need to keep the ballot box safe from illegal voting,” the president said. “And, believe me, you take a look at what’s registering, folks. Take a look at what’s registering. We are going to protect the integrity of the ballot box, and we are going to defend the votes of the American citizen, so important.”

The mainstream media reacted to Mr. Trump’s assertion with derision. Liberal pundits said there is no evidence of fraud.

CNN’s Jake Tapper called it “a stunning allegation for which the White House is providing no evidence. And there is a reason they are providing no evidence — there is no evidence. It is not true.”

Esquire.com said, “The most bizarre lie of Donald Trump’s presidency so far is his claim of widespread voter fraud in an election he won.”

But conservative activists say the liberal media are ignoring evidence — that noncitizen voting is illegal and, thus, fraud. They say the Justice Department in the Obama administration was more concerned with preventing states from cleansing rosters of dead and inactive voters than in mounting any investigation into fraud.

“Most voters are never asked for voter ID, so it is dishonest to suggest that with the tens of millions of illegal and legal aliens here, there is no voter fraud,” said Tom Fitton, who heads the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. “If the key Old Dominion study results on the 2008 election are applied to 2016 — 1.41 million aliens may have voted illegally, with 1.13 million voting for Democrats.”

“A federal voter fraud investigation is long overdue,” Mr. Fitton said. “It would be a simple matter of analyzing voter registration databases against federal databases of aliens and deceased individuals. Why is the left afraid to even ask the questions? The jig is up.”

There does not appear to be any concerted postelection effort by states to take on the daunting task of checking voter rolls and ballots to verify citizenship. In some states, no ID is required to register and vote.

In the absence of detailed accounting, the only scientific way to make an estimate is by post-vote polling.

Mr. Richman relies on a one-of-a-kind poll: the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. Every two years, a consortium of 28 universities produces a detailed report on voters and their views based on polling by YouGov.

Tucked inside the lengthy questionnaire is a question on citizenship status: A significant number of respondents anonymously acknowledged they were not citizens when they voted.

Three professors at Old Dominion University — Mr. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha and David C. Earnest — took these answers, did further research and extrapolated that of a 19.4 million estimate of adult noncitizens, about 620,000 were illegally registered to vote in the 2008 presidential election. Using other measuring tools, they said, the actual number of noncitizen voters could be as low as 38,000 and as high as 2.8 million.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 2012 that there are 22 million noncitizens in the country. The group comprises illegal immigrants and people in the U.S. legally on a visa or permanent resident green card. Of this 22 million, 20 million were 18 or older, the U.S. voting age requirement.

Conservatives have long suspected that Democrats are tacitly encouraging illegal immigrants to vote. Liberal leaders have created “sanctuary cities” across the nation that refuse to work with federal immigration enforcement authorities.

President Obama was asked during the campaign last year if illegal immigrants had anything to fear from federal authorities if they voted in the presidential race.

“Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting,” he was asked on a Latino YouTube channel. “‘So if I vote, will Immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?’”

“Not true, and the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself,” Mr. Obama said. “And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, etc. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential.”

Some conservatives interpreted Mr. Obama’s answer as a go-ahead signal, with his questionable assertion that voter rolls are off limits to federal investigators.

The WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign manger John Podesta’s emails contained one message on directing immigrants to vote. He said immigrants should obtain driver’s licenses and then attest at a polling place that they are U.S. citizens."

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds
 
I don't know why people get so caught up on the popular vote. If we were to change it to straight popular vote many Americans opinions would be left out.
Politicians would only focus on the densely populated metropolitan areas. ..
 
Trump won't buy this study... He'll denounce it and trash it as being wrong.

Because it means he would have still lost the popular vote.
It's really something he should of just kept quiet about since he did win but he was only inaccurate about the number. His number is way too high and the people opposing him set it way too low. It's all just meaningless honestly considering it doesn't change anything at this point. More important things to concentrate on.
 
So, turns out that Trump was on the right track when he made those comments about illegals participating in the election on a large scale.

When you read the below article, consider how many non-citizens either declined to participate in this study or falsely said they didn't vote? Seriously, who in their right mind admits to violating (a potentially serious offense) the law during a phone call with a stranger? Could very well be that Trump's estimate is not far off the mark at all.

I've changed the color of a portion to blue - this is "funny" since liberals have been fighting tooth and nail for years to block voter ID, and also pushed through Motor Voter laws everywhere. Now we know why...

*****

Trump argument bolstered: Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, study finds

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times - Thursday, January 26, 2017

Hillary Clinton garnered more than 800,000 votes from noncitizens on Nov. 8, an approximation far short of President Trump’s estimate of up to 5 million illegal voters but supportive of his charges of fraud.


Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion.

Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.

Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes.

“Is it plausible that non-citizen votes added to Clinton’s margin? Yes,” Mr. Richman wrote. “Is it plausible that non-citizen votes account for the entire nation-wide popular vote margin held by Clinton? Not at all.”

Still, the finding is significant because it means noncitizens may have helped Mrs. Clinton carry a state or finish better than she otherwise would have.

Mr. Trump’s unverified accusation to congressional leaders this week, as reported by The Washington Post, has sent the issue skyward.

He apparently was referring to all types of fraud, such as the “dead” voting or multiple votes from the same person. But the thrust of his estimate appears to be that illegal immigrants and noncitizens carried the popular vote.

He returned to the issue Thursday in Philadelphia, where he spoke to congressional Republicans mapping this year’s legislative calendar.

“We also need to keep the ballot box safe from illegal voting,” the president said. “And, believe me, you take a look at what’s registering, folks. Take a look at what’s registering. We are going to protect the integrity of the ballot box, and we are going to defend the votes of the American citizen, so important.”

The mainstream media reacted to Mr. Trump’s assertion with derision. Liberal pundits said there is no evidence of fraud.

CNN’s Jake Tapper called it “a stunning allegation for which the White House is providing no evidence. And there is a reason they are providing no evidence — there is no evidence. It is not true.”

Esquire.com said, “The most bizarre lie of Donald Trump’s presidency so far is his claim of widespread voter fraud in an election he won.”

But conservative activists say the liberal media are ignoring evidence — that noncitizen voting is illegal and, thus, fraud. They say the Justice Department in the Obama administration was more concerned with preventing states from cleansing rosters of dead and inactive voters than in mounting any investigation into fraud.

“Most voters are never asked for voter ID, so it is dishonest to suggest that with the tens of millions of illegal and legal aliens here, there is no voter fraud,” said Tom Fitton, who heads the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch. “If the key Old Dominion study results on the 2008 election are applied to 2016 — 1.41 million aliens may have voted illegally, with 1.13 million voting for Democrats.”

“A federal voter fraud investigation is long overdue,” Mr. Fitton said. “It would be a simple matter of analyzing voter registration databases against federal databases of aliens and deceased individuals. Why is the left afraid to even ask the questions? The jig is up.”

There does not appear to be any concerted postelection effort by states to take on the daunting task of checking voter rolls and ballots to verify citizenship. In some states, no ID is required to register and vote.

In the absence of detailed accounting, the only scientific way to make an estimate is by post-vote polling.

Mr. Richman relies on a one-of-a-kind poll: the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey. Every two years, a consortium of 28 universities produces a detailed report on voters and their views based on polling by YouGov.

Tucked inside the lengthy questionnaire is a question on citizenship status: A significant number of respondents anonymously acknowledged they were not citizens when they voted.

Three professors at Old Dominion University — Mr. Richman, Gulshan A. Chattha and David C. Earnest — took these answers, did further research and extrapolated that of a 19.4 million estimate of adult noncitizens, about 620,000 were illegally registered to vote in the 2008 presidential election. Using other measuring tools, they said, the actual number of noncitizen voters could be as low as 38,000 and as high as 2.8 million.

The U.S. Census Bureau reported in 2012 that there are 22 million noncitizens in the country. The group comprises illegal immigrants and people in the U.S. legally on a visa or permanent resident green card. Of this 22 million, 20 million were 18 or older, the U.S. voting age requirement.

Conservatives have long suspected that Democrats are tacitly encouraging illegal immigrants to vote. Liberal leaders have created “sanctuary cities” across the nation that refuse to work with federal immigration enforcement authorities.

President Obama was asked during the campaign last year if illegal immigrants had anything to fear from federal authorities if they voted in the presidential race.

“Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens — and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country — are fearful of voting,” he was asked on a Latino YouTube channel. “‘So if I vote, will Immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?’”

“Not true, and the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself,” Mr. Obama said. “And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, etc. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential.”

Some conservatives interpreted Mr. Obama’s answer as a go-ahead signal, with his questionable assertion that voter rolls are off limits to federal investigators.

The WikiLeaks dump of Clinton campaign manger John Podesta’s emails contained one message on directing immigrants to vote. He said immigrants should obtain driver’s licenses and then attest at a polling place that they are U.S. citizens."

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

I call bullshit
Social security administration will not issue a number to an illegal alien. You can't vote without a social.
Ss administration knows who's and who's not a citizen.
 
I call bullshit
Social security administration will not issue a number to an illegal alien. You can't vote without a social.
Ss administration knows who's and who's not a citizen.
I have not heard one credible source say there was wide spread voter fraud. Not surprising that @tenpoundsleft would post this.though.
 
I find this thread WILDLY entertaining for several reasons. If I may, I will list them:

1) this thread was made and the article pasted to make it look like the information contained in it are current of this past Clinton v Trump election. Unfortunately it is based off Pew research from 2008 and Mr Richman's study from 2014. I wonder how studies from 2 and 8 years ago on PAST elections PROVE there was fraud in this one and of the magnitude claimed????

2) people claim one side (I don't follow politics a great deal so idk if it's the left or the right) continuously put out false information in the media to try and deceive the general population from the truth. Ironic, bc that's what the news article above does exactly.

It states, and I quote:

"Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion."

^^^ to anyone reading that they would think that Mr. Richman's blog was meant to support Trump's assertion of rampant voter fraud that was significant enough to cost him the popular vote. Unfortunately for Trump and the people who voted for him, this is not the case. Mr. Richman's blog was actually an attempt to let people know that They wish Trump's team would stop citing his research and misconstruing it to suit their agenda. Let's take a look at some interesting shit, shall we? I'll even be so kind as to highlight what I find to be the funniest parts.

"NORFOLK, Va. - Jesse Richman, an associate professor of Political Science at Old Dominion University, has a message for President Donald Trump and his administration.

"I wish he'd stop citing my research, frankly," he said.

This comes following the president's latest claims that non-citizens voting at the polls could have influenced the outcome of November's popular vote when nearly 3 million more people cast a ballot for Hillary Clinton.


During his Tuesday press briefing White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer alluded to the possibility when talking with reporters about voter fraud.

"I think there's been studies.There's one that came out of Pew in 2008 that shows 14 percent of people voting were non-citizens," Spicer said.

Richman tells News 3 that Spicer was not only confusing another study with his own from 2014, but also exaggerating the numbers.

He says while his study did find evidence that some non-citizens do vote...it's not nearly enough to make up the difference in the most recent popular vote.

"Maybe 100,000 (ballots), maybe a little more to the Hillary Clinton margin. Not insignificant, but on the other hand, way below the kind of levels of fraud that Trump is alleging," said Richman.

Need I say anymore at this point or would it just be beating a dead horse?
 
thread title says 1 million illegal imigrants voted.
article used in thread says 800000 voted.
read a little farther and it's pointed out only 80% voted liberal.
that's a while lot less than 1 million...
 
thread title says 1 million illegal imigrants voted.
article used in thread says 800000 voted.
read a little farther and it's pointed out only 80% voted liberal.
that's a while lot less than 1 million...

That's based on previous elections but the last few years showed a downwards trend. And the author of the study himself estimated that around 100,000 voted for Clinton.
 
I find this thread WILDLY entertaining for several reasons. If I may, I will list them:

1) this thread was made and the article pasted to make it look like the information contained in it are current of this past Clinton v Trump election. Unfortunately it is based off Pew research from 2008 and Mr Richman's study from 2014. I wonder how studies from 2 and 8 years ago on PAST elections PROVE there was fraud in this one and of the magnitude claimed????

2) people claim one side (I don't follow politics a great deal so idk if it's the left or the right) continuously put out false information in the media to try and deceive the general population from the truth. Ironic, bc that's what the news article above does exactly.

It states, and I quote:

"Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion."

^^^ to anyone reading that they would think that Mr. Richman's blog was meant to support Trump's assertion of rampant voter fraud that was significant enough to cost him the popular vote. Unfortunately for Trump and the people who voted for him, this is not the case. Mr. Richman's blog was actually an attempt to let people know that They wish Trump's team would stop citing his research and misconstruing it to suit their agenda. Let's take a look at some interesting shit, shall we? I'll even be so kind as to highlight what I find to be the funniest parts.

"NORFOLK, Va. - Jesse Richman, an associate professor of Political Science at Old Dominion University, has a message for President Donald Trump and his administration.

"I wish he'd stop citing my research, frankly," he said.

This comes following the president's latest claims that non-citizens voting at the polls could have influenced the outcome of November's popular vote when nearly 3 million more people cast a ballot for Hillary Clinton.


During his Tuesday press briefing White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer alluded to the possibility when talking with reporters about voter fraud.

"I think there's been studies.There's one that came out of Pew in 2008 that shows 14 percent of people voting were non-citizens," Spicer said.

Richman tells News 3 that Spicer was not only confusing another study with his own from 2014, but also exaggerating the numbers.

He says while his study did find evidence that some non-citizens do vote...it's not nearly enough to make up the difference in the most recent popular vote.

"Maybe 100,000 (ballots), maybe a little more to the Hillary Clinton margin. Not insignificant, but on the other hand, way below the kind of levels of fraud that Trump is alleging," said Richman.

Need I say anymore at this point or would it just be beating a dead horse?

Trump exaggerating?? I don't believe it! Stop spreading fake news, Doc :p

And a White House Press Secretary bending and distorting the truth to the public? Thats never happened before, lol
 
That's based on previous elections but the last few years showed a downwards trend. And the author of the study himself estimated that around 100,000 voted for Clinton.
I saw that, I'm not a liberal but I do appreciate realistic figures a whole lot. Even if they don't bolster my candidate...
 
Back
Top