Jin23
Well-known Member
Okay guys, here we go. Direct comparision for the same 2 products.
CJC No Dac:
View attachment 258119
View attachment 258122
Testosterone Cypionate:
View attachment 258123
View attachment 258124
First of all big thanks to @Qingdao Sigma Chemicals he and @Analiza Bialek and @janoshik for making this comparision possible. There is a very slight difference in both products tested. Sadly @Analiza Bialek did not further specify if the tested peptide is Cjc-1295 NO DAC (also called Mod Grf 1-29) or is it Cjc-1295 WITH DAC.
I sent them an email to maybe have some more clarification about this, as this lab test leaves me with doubts and a little unsatisfied, sadly.
Janoshik was super quick, if I remember correctly it took him only 1 day to test the products after he received the package, which is awesome - almost like Amazon next day service. Nothing to complain here.
Analiza Bialek however took 9 days total after receiving the package. This is still fine to me if there was at least some kind of information, just to let me know it takes some time. But maybe I am just too unpatient. Overall everything was kinda smooth, they confirmed receiving the package and were very polite and friendly in emails.
They essentially detected two different compounds.
CJC-1295 is the modified version of mod grf 1-29, with the long half life (with dac) ie. what the community likes to call cjc dac.
However, @janoshik also failed to properly name the substance. Officially there is no cjc no dac or cjc-1295 dac, etc. etc. There is only mod grf 1-29 and cjc-1295, period. However, no matter if he got the naming nomenclature down wrong, he clearly stated it's mod-grf.
And if we follow the official naming nomenclature @Analiza Bialek stated a different compound, that is cjc-1295.
Good effort on the test @HB_22