MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Are you ok with Muslim refugees moving in next to you in the US?
- Thread starter Desibaba
- Start date
Why I am an Islamophobe
Ed Suominen’s Shitty Little Blog: Why I am an Islamophobe
Note: This isn’t about anything proposed by Donald Trump, who is a bigoted narcissist with a hopelessly simplistic view of the world. Please give yourself some time to read this essay beyond the headline. The truly impatient might at least look at its conclusion.
Ed Suominen’s Shitty Little Blog: Why I am an Islamophobe
Note: This isn’t about anything proposed by Donald Trump, who is a bigoted narcissist with a hopelessly simplistic view of the world. Please give yourself some time to read this essay beyond the headline. The truly impatient might at least look at its conclusion.
xy5jn0
New Member
You mean real data like this?
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/tx-court-of-appeals/1576708.html
Sworder
Member
Bravo xy5jn0! Bravo! Show everybody what kind of person harbors those anti-Islam thoughts. You and CBS make a great case.
Last edited:
xy5jn0
New Member
Real data is real data. Lol
Sworder
Member
Non sequitur.
Sworder
Member
Before linking to the article, I just want to point out that you heard it here first, folks. Your humble correspondent CBS dutifully pointed this to you out on Dec 3, 2015:
Just more evidence that we're way ahead of the curve here at Meso-Rx. And now, without further ado:
Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
http://dailycaller.com/author/jbennett/ (Jonah Bennett)
4:52 PM 12/10/2015
Read more: Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
The FBI has taken heat for failing to immediately classify the San Bernardino shootings as terrorism, but a new report shows that FBI reluctance could have been due to external pressure from the White House.
A source told Jack Murphy of SOFREP that the FBI instantly believed the shooting, which left 14 dead, to be a clear act of terrorism. The White House, however, didn’t feel the same way and quickly moved in to squash the terror classification.
This source added that as soon as the shooting took place, Obama convened a meeting with the National Security Council and the heads of other federal enforcement agencies to discuss a public relations strategy.
Part of the reason for trying to avoid the designation of the shootings as terrorism is because it threatens to upset the Obama administration’s strategy in Syria. A case of Islamic terrorism in the U.S. would put additional pressure on the administration to play a much more active role in the conflict.
But in this case, because the preponderance evidence so pointed to terrorism, the FBI’s hand was forced, and the agency declared the existence of a terrorism investigation, going against top-down priorities from the White House. Syed Rizwan Farook, the shooter, had contact with ISIS and other groups.
In response, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Department of Justice was ready and waiting to prosecute people engaging in “anti-Muslim” rhetoric.
Michael Flynn, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said publicly that the Obama administration wants to completely sideline discussion of terrorism, because it contradicts the claim that al-Qaida is dwindling. Obama recently suffered major embarrassment after he claimed that ISIS was contained, only one day before the Paris attacks took place.
In the end, Obama told the American people in a public address from the Oval Office that the attacks were an act of terrorism, though he hedged his admission by saying that the war is not on Islam, but against ISIS.
He added that sending boots on the ground into Syria and Iraq would be a huge mistake. Obama has already violated previous promises not to send boots on the ground by authorizing 50 special operations forces into northern Syria, where the Kurds hold sway.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the troops didn’t really count because they are not part of a combat mission.
Just more evidence that we're way ahead of the curve here at Meso-Rx. And now, without further ado:
Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
http://dailycaller.com/author/jbennett/ (Jonah Bennett)
4:52 PM 12/10/2015
Read more: Report: Obama Told NSC And FBI To ‘Downplay’ Terrorist Angle Of San Bernardino
The FBI has taken heat for failing to immediately classify the San Bernardino shootings as terrorism, but a new report shows that FBI reluctance could have been due to external pressure from the White House.
A source told Jack Murphy of SOFREP that the FBI instantly believed the shooting, which left 14 dead, to be a clear act of terrorism. The White House, however, didn’t feel the same way and quickly moved in to squash the terror classification.
This source added that as soon as the shooting took place, Obama convened a meeting with the National Security Council and the heads of other federal enforcement agencies to discuss a public relations strategy.
Part of the reason for trying to avoid the designation of the shootings as terrorism is because it threatens to upset the Obama administration’s strategy in Syria. A case of Islamic terrorism in the U.S. would put additional pressure on the administration to play a much more active role in the conflict.
But in this case, because the preponderance evidence so pointed to terrorism, the FBI’s hand was forced, and the agency declared the existence of a terrorism investigation, going against top-down priorities from the White House. Syed Rizwan Farook, the shooter, had contact with ISIS and other groups.
In response, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said the Department of Justice was ready and waiting to prosecute people engaging in “anti-Muslim” rhetoric.
Michael Flynn, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said publicly that the Obama administration wants to completely sideline discussion of terrorism, because it contradicts the claim that al-Qaida is dwindling. Obama recently suffered major embarrassment after he claimed that ISIS was contained, only one day before the Paris attacks took place.
In the end, Obama told the American people in a public address from the Oval Office that the attacks were an act of terrorism, though he hedged his admission by saying that the war is not on Islam, but against ISIS.
He added that sending boots on the ground into Syria and Iraq would be a huge mistake. Obama has already violated previous promises not to send boots on the ground by authorizing 50 special operations forces into northern Syria, where the Kurds hold sway.
White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the troops didn’t really count because they are not part of a combat mission.
Last edited:
Sworder
Member
CBS, what was their motive?
Doesn't an act have to have some sort of political agenda to be considered terrorism?
Call it terrorism or not. It doesn't have to do with Islam... This is getting old.
What's your support for this? A random line in the Quaran?
Please answer this question:
Do you have to practice "jihad" to be a Muslim? The question is pertaining if that is a core value of Islam.
Or like how you're a homebody but would do more things if you had someone to do stuff with? Or how you like all music but rock and Texas music are your favorites? Or how you wouldn't have worked out in the King and his clothes fable? Or your dreamy blue eyes and bald head...which is ironic bc Sworder posted a pic of Patrick Stewart lol
xy5jn0
New Member
Yeah like that.
xy5jn0
New Member
Although calling my eyes "dreamy" is all you.I figured as much
Of course it is but I figured I'd embellish the story a bit since you didn't. I stand by my assessment. And you do know steroids are drugs right?
xy5jn0
New Member
Well I'm flattered bro. And yes I know that. We're kinda straying from the subject of the thread but you're the vet here so I'll follow your lead.
We both know where we're straying towards
.I'm not a vet btw, I'm a member just like yourself.
xy5jn0
New Member
Actually I'm not sure.We both know where we're straying towards
I'm not a vet btw, I'm a member just like yourself.
I do like the "member just like you" treatment on this forum. It's a great concept that really does add to the free flow of information, ideas and opinions.
xy5jn0
New Member
Ok sounds ok with me.
Similar threads
