bodybuilder805
New Member
^^^Honestly bro, this is childish.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
woah...milliard...thats a bit much lol...there is a difference in my argument about AP and WP and my job as a lawyer...hell yeah I can argue with the best in my profession but this is different..please dont confuse the two and play as they are the same...this is not a court of law and I am not being an attorney...sure I have been off base a bit and the reason why is I think AP and WP have not only a partnership but vested members...in one way or another...I know for a fact they scam, lie and are fraudulent to a point...I dont like the lies, threats and anything they do...that is what I am after..not a court battle and this means shit to about how I can argue the facts and make my point clear..so please Milliard dont compare this with my expertise with my occupation...again fact is, if I can deter any member from these so called pharma's, then I did my job..,,,,safety, security, and knowledge is number one in my book....and thats why I stick to the boards that feel do this...and WP has threated members to give up personal info as a vendettaBigkarch, I'm disappointed that you resorted to personal attacks. Of course, it's an argument. You have repeatedly presented AP=WP as fact before admitting it was merely an opinion. I have no interest whatsoever in defending either company. I just wanted evidence that AP=WP.
I know you're a professional and you know how to make arguments to defend a position. You're an attorney after all. Yet, you've utilized so many logical fallacies in this thread.
(1) argumentum ad populum - everyone thinks it's true, so it must be true
(2) ignoratio elenchi - redirecting argument to another issue you can better defend.
The argument is "does WP=AP?" yet you want to change it to "does WP/AP = scam?". WP=AP has nothing to do with how big a scammer WP/AP may or may not be.
(3) negative proof - instead of trying to prove WP=AP, you place burden on proving WP does not equal AP.
Remember the whole "Why haven’t we had an official response to the rumor that Glenn Beck raped and murdered a girl in 1990?" meme a while back where people assumed it was true because Beck did not provide evidence to refute it. It was used to highlight Beck's ridiculous use of the negative proof fallacy.
(4) ad hominem - people are stupid for not believing WP=AP, so your argument must be true
Your motives may be noble. Many may believe the end justifies the means. But I think you can get from A to be B without doing what you've done in this thread. There may be little harm in doing what you're doing. Speculation/opinion is can be informative when identified as such. If being a stickler for truth and evidence keeps people from coming to this forum, then so be it.
^^^Honestly bro, this is childish.
there is a difference in my argument about AP and WP and my job as a lawyer...hell yeah I can argue with the best in my profession but this is different..please dont confuse the two and play as they are the same...this is not a court of law and I am not being an attorney...sure I have been off base a bit
if I can deter any member from these so called pharma's, then I did my job..,,,,safety, security, and knowledge is number one in my book....and thats why I stick to the boards that feel do this...and WP has threated members to give up personal info as a vendetta
but as an argument in court beyond a reasonable doubt...if you were a juror given this info, could you say beyond a reasonable doubt, that WP is not AP
^^^Honestly bro, this is childish.
http://forums.isteroids.com/search.php?searchid=314747
@Banner your attempt at trying so hard to come at me is comedic. From here on I will simply ignore your comments.
Shill, per your posts you're "a mod and a well respected vet on a few other boards" who "ain't about to lie to anybody" and you promote AP/BD products as having been manufactured in a facility which has passed a GMP inspection. Why are you unable to provide any details about AP/BD's GMP inspection which has been included in your many endorsements of those brands?
What board made you a member of their staff with Greg Valentino as your avatar?
It isn't this one:
Code:http://forums.isteroids.com/search.php?searchid=314747
I also have to say, I have not been scammed in a long time...there are many boards that closely watch and monitored their advertisers or sources and when bad news comes about, they are suspended until they make things right or banned...not ifs, and's or butts....it happens, but when it does, the problems are taken care of...I have even seen when a member gets scammed, a good source on the board, gave free gear to that member who was scammed...those boards Im speaking of know who they are.....
I would assume that you would use the same argumentative skills developed as an a lawyer in every other aspect of you life. It's a skill set that's applicable everywhere. My apologies if you do not agree.
Thank you for your honesty.
You probably know exactly what you are doing. Who am I to criticize your use of fallacious arguments. They often work. But not on me.
Since you bring up evidence standards in U.S. court, you and I know that in a court of law, the burden of proof is not to prove innocence but to prove guilt.
Oh yes you and i both come from the same place