Seattle23
Well-known Member
Nothing against testing or Pareto but a lab sending in their own product makes me think twice. Just saying
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nothing against testing or Pareto but a lab sending in their own product makes me think twice. Just saying
Nothing against testing or Pareto but a lab sending in their own product makes me think twice. Just saying
I appreciate taking the stance of looking out for harm reduction. Unfortunately when was the last test you sent in ? For anyone to claim any lab is considered consistent, a batch needs to be tested every single month. Even then a raw batch can test at 98% but that doesn't mean a lab won't cut the raws aka (profit margin). My comments are not directed to this lab it's inregards to all UGL's. In the end this is the drug game and it's about profit to them. Including these guys testing the gear. So I take it all with a gain of salt.You know I was thinking about what I wrote as my reply and maybe I didn't explain why I feel the way I do.
So I've tested 3 labs so far, Pareto, a 2nd canadian lab and an international china lab.
Let's start with the other Canadian...
Well this one I got fucked over with. All the claims of testing and overdosing and this and that. Well I dealt with shitty emails back and forth, bullshit about everything. Fighting over payment of the tests (after he agreed to pay beforehand)
All around it was a bad experience like it was my fault about his products not meeting label claim. (Don't want to get into it, PM me if you do want more)
2nd dealing with the chinese international was also amazing. Treated me great through it all. Paid for some of my tests even though they weren't official Simec accredited lab reports. (I didn't ask for my 2nd round because they treated me great overall I just wanted to give back)
Now Pareto, When I tested his product...Analyzer came back with a first report that wasn't favorable. The rep didn't say one shitty thing to me and i'm very confident would've made things right. However, before he did that he had Jano review the report first as he didn't understand why the result was low.
After a few back and forths of questions, it lead to several retests or recalculations done by Analyzer leading to the product testing actually was a mistake first time. (Turns out he made a mistake on more than a couple reports but) The final report turned out to be just a mistake done by analyzer and good for Pareto.
However what really set my opinion was how I was dealt with. All positive communication and then the tests actually got paid for, for what I did. I didn't have to fight, I didn't do anything, just all positive experiences about the whole thing. Through the process the rep was amazing and I really got the feeling he cared about his product. So when I see him testing raws I see a different side than maybe someone else would see.
I most likely will do some testing in the new year and the rep won't know until the test is done.
Hopefully i'll actually get a different lab in next year as well for some comparison.
But anyways I guess that's my story....Shill or whatever you might want to call it. I care about trying to mitigate my exposure to shit and harm reduction in general.
So due to my experience, which I hope you understand why I do say that based on what experience I had explained above. Is why I look at things different than maybe you do.
I appreciate taking the stance of looking out for harm reduction. Unfortunately when was the last test you sent in ? For anyone to claim any lab is considered consistent, a batch needs to be tested every single month. Even then a raw batch can test at 98% but that doesn't mean a lab won't cut the raws aka (profit margin). My comments are not directed to this lab it's inregards to all UGL's. In the end this is the drug game and it's about profit to them. Including these guys testing the gear. So I take it all with a gain of salt.
Why test every month? Well due too the fact no lab here has control of the raws they receive from china. Looking at the testing program Meso-Rx has started. It's disappointing to see not one Canadian lab has ever been tested. Anyway Steve not picking a fight here just some friendly back & fourth.
Hey guys just seen this thread looks like a good Canadian source i see many positive reviews. I have a few questions: Do i need a different kind of email address to reach out to Pareto and also what does CIM mean? My apologies if these are dumb questions. Now i figured CIM is cash in mail but like does that actually mean put money in an envelope and mail it??
Thanks for the replyCIM = Cum in your mouth...
As you gotta take it
Thanks for the reply
I really don’t understand your angle here? Have you ever used there products? If not what lab do you currently use? And with a name like “Seattle23” are you American or Canadian? If American do you have any access to Canadian labs? You seem to be awfully sceptical of this lab for what reason? Why are you not calling out other labs as well?I appreciate taking the stance of looking out for harm reduction. Unfortunately when was the last test you sent in ? For anyone to claim any lab is considered consistent, a batch needs to be tested every single month. Even then a raw batch can test at 98% but that doesn't mean a lab won't cut the raws aka (profit margin). My comments are not directed to this lab it's inregards to all UGL's. In the end this is the drug game and it's about profit to them. Including these guys testing the gear. So I take it all with a gain of salt.
There was no angle here and if you were not illiterate. You would have read my comments were directed to ALL ugl's. Here's a gift for you son.I really don’t understand your angle here? Have you ever used there products? If not what lab do you currently use? And with a name like “Seattle23” are you American or Canadian? If American do you have any access to Canadian labs? You seem to be awfully sceptical of this lab for what reason? Why are you not calling out other labs as well?
There was no angle here and if you were not illiterate. You would have read my comments were directed to ALL ugl's. Here's a gift for you son.
View attachment 98935
Definitely a yank. Too condescending not to be....
Pretty big words , nice book too ,how long did it take you to read it?There was no angle here and if you were not illiterate. You would have read my comments were directed to ALL ugl's. Here's a gift for you son.
View attachment 98935