Chilton Labs - UK Domestic & International

Any reason for the lack of testing @ChiltonLabs ?

I'm running your NPP right now that I received from you about 6 weeks ago. Is there a lab report for this batch? I just assumed it was dosed at what you had on the old .com website which I now see is a report from the end of 2022.
If we are talking about the same batch it was under dosed just by 7mg which is absolutely fine so where is the problem ? Some people can’t fell difference between 300 and 600 so you can’t feel 7mg. Also what’s the point of doing test of some product over and over again ? When it was once legit why would he started to fake it ? What would be point of this ? Also some test are incredibly expensive idk rn about AAS but for example IGF-1 LR3 test cost around 400€
 
If we are talking about the same batch it was under dosed just by 7mg which is absolutely fine so where is the problem ? Some people can’t fell difference between 300 and 600 so you can’t feel 7mg. Also what’s the point of doing test of some product over and over again ? When it was once legit why would he started to fake it ? What would be point of this ? Also some test are incredibly expensive idk rn about AAS but for example IGF-1 LR3 test cost around 400€
Jeri must make some pretty fucking big batches if he’s still selling the same ones as 11+ months ago.

As for your second point …. i don’t even know where to start on that one if you can’t already see why labs should be posting testing for every batch. Your argument that we should just assume all subsequent batches are of the same standard as their first is just utterly ridiculous.
 
Any reason for the lack of testing @ChiltonLabs ?

I'm running your NPP right now that I received from you about 6 weeks ago. Is there a lab report for this batch? I just assumed it was dosed at what you had on the old .com website which I now see is a report from the end of 2022.
All of his reports are from 2022. Same as most EU sources. They provided testing once and never tested again so for fall you know you're injecting half the dosage, or probably no do
Dosage
 
If we are talking about the same batch it was under dosed just by 7mg which is absolutely fine so where is the problem ? Some people can’t fell difference between 300 and 600 so you can’t feel 7mg. Also what’s the point of doing test of some product over and over again ? When it was once legit why would he started to fake it ? What would be point of this ? Also some test are incredibly expensive idk rn about AAS but for example IGF-1 LR3 test cost around 400€
400 euro is nothing compared to what this guy makes. He can afford some batch testing a couple of times a year. He not gonna go broke.
 
Jeri must make some pretty fucking big batches if he’s still selling the same ones as 11+ months ago.

As for your second point …. i don’t even know where to start on that one if you can’t already see why labs should be posting testing for every batch. Your argument that we should just assume all subsequent batches are of the same standard as their first is just utterly ridiculous.
If you buy something from random dude and he prove you he got legit stuff and then again and again why would he tried to scam you after 3 successful 3 orders ? It works with everything no one in and business will prove you again and again and again 1000x times he’s not trying to scam you. Also what’s so problem sending it for test by yourself?
 
If you buy something from random dude and he prove you he got legit stuff and then again and again why would he tried to scam you after 3 successful 3 orders ? It works with everything no one in and business will prove you again and again and again 1000x times he’s not trying to scam you. Also what’s so problem sending it for test by yourself?
Are you retarded? The noney they make of selling drugs here and they can't afford test for some stuff for 2 years?
Another thing is testing from 2 years ago doesn't mean shit 2 years later. How do you know it isn't 20% u deposed at least unless you're testjng it yourself?

Regular testing for two main reasons for me: 1) it builds trust and shows consistency

2) it benefits him and will attract wayyyy more business. Look at liska, made an effort to test every batch and became the EU biggest source on here.
 
If you buy something from random dude and he prove you he got legit stuff and then again and again why would he tried to scam you after 3 successful 3 orders ? It works with everything no one in and business will prove you again and again and again 1000x times he’s not trying to scam you. Also what’s so problem sending it for test by yourself
Every source here is as good as their last batch. The cost to test every batch is minute compared to the money they’re making selling it.
 
Don't be like this clown. Fully grown 30 something year old adult who can't take responsibility for his own mistakes.


Customer: Hi
This parcel is saying it’s been delivered but the picture is some random black box which I’ve never seen before. Can you contact them please.


Me: Black postal box outside of the property.


Customer: Hi
That’s not my house. I have tracked it down. It’s in its way back to you. The person who house is it returned it to sender. Can you send it back when it arrives back please
But to 57A not 56 please
Regards


Me: The address provided for the order is visible in all email that were sent to you. Double check the address you provided at time of ordering. Due to the nature of items being sold we don't receive parcels back. They go to a return centre where they get destroyed.


Customer:
Well can you tell them not to destroy them. I put 56 instead of 57 and the guy had sent them back.
Due to the nature of the goods? Surely the post man shouldn’t be posting them through letter boxes then?


Customer:
Also can I just add it wasn't even at the right address of the mistake I made. I put 56a instead of 57a and it was just at 56. I found the address by locating that big letter box and knocked on the door.


Me: Out of my hands unfortunately due to the nature of goods being sold.
It looks like "56a" doesn't exist on the royal mail PAF. We ship to the address provided by the customer. The customer receives three different emails which include the shipping address. The customer is reminded to double check the shipping address in the payment details email.

What the postman does is also out of my hands. There is no signature required for the "royal mail tracked 24" service, therefore the postman will usually post it through a letter box/leave it in a safe place



Customer: Dear Chilton Labs
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to bring to your attention a concerning issue regarding my recent order, which has resulted in an failed delivery.

While I acknowledge that I mistakenly inputted the wrong address, the delivery was fortunately made to a neighbor without any complications. However, upon cross-checking with the delivery confirmation sent three times, it is evident that the package did not reach the specified address I provided during the order.

In light of the Consumer Rights Act, I am exercising my right to either receive a refund or have the item resent to my correct address. This request is based on the fact that, according to your chosen mailing service, the item has not reached the intended destination.

To provide clarity, I have attached a photo clearly showing the delivery made to the incorrect address, along with the relevant tracking number. I trust this additional information will facilitate a swift resolution and prevent any potential confusion on your end.

I kindly request your confirmation within the next 7 days regarding the course of action you intend to take to address this matter. Your prompt attention to this issue is greatly appreciated.

Thank you for your understanding, and I look forward to your swift response.


Me:
There is no confusion on my end, the intended destination, "56a" doesn't exist so the postman delivered to "56". He would have either delivered to "56" or returned to the return centre so either way the package would not have reached you due to your own fault.

I am unable to bear the loss if a customer makes a mistake with the address. You had three opportunities to check the address and failed to do so.



Customer: Regrettably, I find myself compelled to escalate this matter to Trading Standards due to the apparent violation of the Consumer Rights Act. Despite my initial attempt to seek an amicable resolution, it appears that we have reached an impasse.

As a consumer, I have the right to expect that my purchase is delivered to the specified address accurately, as outlined in the aforementioned legislation. Since our attempts to resolve this issue amicably have proven unsuccessful, I am left with no alternative but to involve Trading Standards to ensure the protection of my consumer rights.

I trust that the gravity of this situation prompts a thorough review of the circumstances, and I remain open to a fair and timely resolution. However, as of now, I must proceed with the appropriate channels to address this breach.


Me: You are failing to see that the address you provided does not exist. Make sure to let them know that you made a mistake and did not provide your own address when placing an order.
This is why I could never be a seller, I’d end up losing my mind lol.
 
Check the batch number on the vial to the one on the jano report?

I checked the batch# and it's the same original batch that was tested back at the end of '22

Either these are huge batches that Jeri is brewing or something fishy is going on. Definitely need some input here from Chilton.
 
I checked the batch# and it's the same original batch that was tested back at the end of '22

Either these are huge batches that Jeri is brewing or something fishy is going on. Definitely need some input here from Chilton.
If so then it wouldn’t be the first time that Chilton’s lab tests have been a bit dodgy ….

So if you have Winstrol with 4 different filler colours that would indicate they are all different batches and pressed at different times….

Would you have lab reports for each of these batches? Not trying to be picky but just going off what you said a few red flags started flashing…

Made at the same time, same recipe and with the same raws that were tested beforehand.
Other Meso sources have been torn a new arsehole in the past for using one lab test result for multiple batches & quite rightly so.
 
If so then it wouldn’t be the first time that Chilton’s lab tests have been a bit dodgy ….




Other Meso sources have been torn a new arsehole in the past for using one lab test result for multiple batches & quite rightly so.
After having a look around over the last 2 weeks or so there's definitely a few that need reminding.
Also looks like there's a big influx of new people, probably young lads who just want steroids and aren't even thinking of the fact that they're needs to be standards and that these people are still drug dealers doing this for money, not fir altruism.
 
Back
Top