Conan_the_Barbellian
New Member
No matter how you want to try to rationalize this to yourself, this all points to Pareto being behind Citadel in some way shape or form, which is nothing but a plus for the Citadel line.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's the "a href" attribute in HTML coding. You could create a link the says "free porn" but the link goes to the Disney website, because the "free porn" part is only the description.
So at the worst, Citadel purposely did this to further the rumor of a Pareto link.It's the "a href" attribute in HTML coding. You could create a link the says "free porn" but the link goes to the Disney website, because the "free porn" part is only the description.
You obviously do not understand marketing.Well in my opinion that definitely links them to some capacity but I’ve yet to see a logical explanation or evidence as to why Pareto would sell the exact same product for less.
It’s not a mind boggler by any means but you have shown no real evidence that Pareto would take its own product and sell it for less. What I do see is a junior member with a possible agenda. Never seen you post then all of a sudden you’re proving a point in this thread, sounds legit to me....This shouldn't be such a mind boggler to everyone really. It is simple marketing and economics of marketing products.
You obviously do not understand business. You’re telling me presidents choice cola is Coke? Not buying your bullshit pal, and your explanation sucks.You obviously do not understand marketing.
PC brand is not necessarily made by Coke, but it is made by another major brand. Do you think PC makes new factories to produce every product it's name is on? Same for Costco/Kirkland, Walmart/Great Value etc.?You obviously do not understand business. You’re telling me presidents choice cola is Coke? Not buying your bullshit pal, and your explanation sucks.
Well that settles it lol. Again I wasn’t disagreeing completely. There’s proof the two are linked but your shit explanation provided no proof whatsoever to back your theory and that’s all it is is a theory so farPC brand is not necessarily made by Coke, but it is made by another major brand. Do you think PC makes new factories to produce every product it's name is on? Same for Costco/Kirkland, Walmart/Great Value etc.?
Buy my explanation or not, it makes no difference to me either way.
So at the worst, Citadel purposely did this to further the rumor of a Pareto link.
Well let’s hope they do but why did you come here from cjm just to tell everyone your theory?unless either Pareto or Citadel come out and confirms it, No there is no Concrete proof. Just some strange coincidences that strongly point that way.
And all you have posted about in one day is on this thread...I came to Meso for the info on this and other labs, I joined in on an existing conversation after finding that hyperlink issue.
I answered that in the post above the quoted one. I came to Meso because source info isn't allowed on CJM, and joined in on the existing conversation linking the two labs. I did not start this theory. Next time i want to join a new forum and join in on the threads I'll be sure to check with you first ok? LMAOWell let’s hope they do but why did you come here from cjm just to tell everyone your theory?
I answered that in the post above the quoted one. I came to Meso because source info isn't allowed on CJM, and joined in on the existing conversation linking the two labs. I did not start this theory. Next time i want to join a new forum and join in on the threads I'll be sure to check with you first ok? LMAO
Because you are coming with an agenda from a competitor lab that is probably upset that a brand like citadel may take their clients.And if i did come here just to give everyone my $0.02 on the issue, why is that so wrong?