Exactly this, the effect takes longer to accumulate but this is what I have always noticed. This is nutrition partitioning effects is what I am looking for with HGHDo I *feel* like it has? No not at all.
What it does do for me is significantly raise the amount of calories I can consume before I start to gain fat.
Doesn't pharma-grade HGH do the same?Do I *feel* like it has? No not at all.
What it does do for me is significantly raise the amount of calories I can consume before I start to gain fat.
So your fat level hasn’t decreased at all whilst using hgh? Is that diet related in your opinion?
Or you think even if you did eat clean (less calories) you wouldn’t be lean whilst using generic hgh?
Doesn't pharma-grade HGH do the same?
Pharma grade is no different than generic if they’re both within acceptable ranges… except, these days it seems some good generics may be even higher quality than pharma.Doesn't pharma-grade HGH do the same?
At what IU amount and for how long being on it?When cutting GH allows me to get lean much, much quicker without having to cut calories as much. When eating in a surplus GH keeps me much leaner and allows me to eat more and have more cheat meals without getting fat.
Very much true.Pharma grade is no different than generic if they’re both within acceptable ranges…
Where do you get this idea? I remember using scihub to read HPLC study with diff brands of pharmaceutical grade, all tested over 98% purity. With pharma grade there's no "is this really what it says it is" + issues with consistency, which can and do occur with good generic providers.except, these days it seems some good generics may be even higher quality than pharma.
Pharma is allowed to have up to 3-4% Dimer. Good generics have none. And with Janoshik’s new method, pharma is testing, if I recall correctly, is 94-96%, I think with 1-4% Dimer.Very much true.
What's even more ridiculous than the people who talk about it like two diff substance is those who think the different brands of pharma GH have different side-effects.
There are studies where patients switched brands and zero difference. Why? Because it's the same thing--it's a synthetic product ffs, not home made strawberry jam. If the peptide chain is the correct order and sequence then it's GH, does what GH does.
Where do you get this idea? I remember using scihub to read HPLC study with diff brands of pharmaceutical grade, all tested over 98% purity. With pharma grade there's no "is this really what it says it is" + issues with consistency, which can and do occur with good generic providers.
Serostim tested over 98% (honestly it might have been 99%) no dimer, but I’ve also seen genotropin tests less than 95% with over 2% dimer as I recall. Seems pharma can be as hit and miss as ugl.Pharma is allowed to have up to 3-4% Dimer. Good generics have none. And with Janoshik’s new method, pharma is testing, if I recall correctly, is 94-96%, I think with 1-4% Dimer.
Why do I barely get any water retention and thin skin on pharma hgh (Cinnatropin) at 4 iu daily 7 days a week and then run QSC 4 iu daily 7 days a week and I’m holding water? Diet is exactly the same using both brands.It’s really confusing when QSC hgh tests so well (purity,dimer).
Pharma is allowed to have up to 3-4% Dimer. Good generics have none. And with Janoshik’s new method, pharma is testing, if I recall correctly, is 94-96%, I think with 1-4% Dimer.
Serostim tested over 98% (honestly it might have been 99%) no dimer, but I’ve also seen genotropin tests less than 95% with over 2% dimer as I recall. Seems pharma can be as hit and miss as ugl.
Hgh makes cutting while holding onto your lean mass so much easier in my opinion as for op.
Pharma grade is no different than generic if they’re both within acceptable ranges… except, these days it seems some good generics may be even higher quality than pharma.