Enhanced Testing Database

[T-Bagger]

Thread 'QSC raw Bolde U 87% purity - GCMS'

Jan 28, 2025

Attached the GCMS of bolde U
A big thank you to @bigMoJo that offered to pay for it in total!
I appreciated the help very much!

Please @readalot we need your analysis here xD

Janoshik Analytical

• Sampei
• Replies: 22
• Forum: Analytical Lab Testing

• 

Smdh but let’s keep crying over them being gone because of cheap gear.

 

[Sampei]

Smdh but let’s keep crying over them being gone because of cheap gear.

I don't understand what you mean bagger.

 

[T-Bagger]

I don't understand what you mean bagger.

87% seems on the low side for purity. I get it, that QSC isn’t the manufacturer of those raws, but more of a general comment of how people mourn for QSC no longer being here, while tolerating their garbage customer service as well as their other issues like floaters, just because they offered cheap prices.

 

[Sampei]

87% seems on the low side for purity. I get it, that QSC isn’t the manufacturer of those raws, but more of a general comment of how people mourn for QSC no longer being here, while tolerating their garbage customer service as well as their other issues like floaters, just because they offered cheap prices.

87% is ok for boldenone, average raw purity of boldenone it's 90% lately so not far from it. In the past it was 75/80% xD

 

[NeoAnabolics]

 

[T-Bagger]

View attachment 314786View attachment 314787View attachment 314788View attachment 314789

Post here: Analytical Lab Testing

 

[NeoAnabolics]

Post here: Analytical Lab Testing

My apologies, only posted here because Readalot ask me to do so. I will not do so in the future.

 

[T-Bagger]

My apologies, only posted here because Readalot ask me to do so. I will not do so in the future.

No worries, just figured you’d want to post in the analysis section where most would go to look for them.

 

[Ateam2023]

My apologies, only posted here because Readalot ask me to do so. I will not do so in the future.

Post in both threads for "more exposure " , makes sense to get it out there for obvious reasons , , Testing results are good everywhere you post them , but @Tbagger is right,,

 

[readalot]

My apologies, only posted here because Readalot ask me to do so. I will not do so in the future.

Not following your comment. I don't think I ever asked you to post your HPLC results for finished products in this thread. Raws HPLC testing? Sure, if you'd like.

Scope:

1. Hplc Purity
2. GCMS
3. Expanded metals list
4. Endotoxins
5. Residual solvents
6. Sterility

Previous example:

Post in thread 'Enhanced Testing Database'

Jan 6, 2025

• NeoAnabolics

• 

 

[readalot]

My apologies

Why would you need to apologize? Of all the stuff we have too much of here, testing results ain't one of them.

Does make sense to post your finished products HPLC results in your HPLC thread. This thread meant to highlight efforts above and beyond what is considered the current standard.

 

[NeoAnabolics]

No worries, just figured you’d want to post in the analysis section where most would go to look for them.

Ah, ok. Gotcha! I posted them on there as well. Thank you!

Post in both threads for "more exposure " , makes sense to get it out there for obvious reasons , , Testing results are good everywhere you post them , but @Tbagger is right,,

Thank you sir. I appreciate the advice!

Why would you need to apologize? Of all the stuff we have too much of here, testing results ain't one of them.

Does make sense to post your finished products HPLC results in your HPLC thread. This thread meant to highlight efforts above and beyond what is considered the current standard.

They are posted on there as well. Will just keep HPLC testing to my thread. Thank you sir.

 

[readalot]

They are posted on there as well. Will just keep HPLC testing to my thread. Thank you sir.

Keep testing those raws. Way to go!

Post them here if you want to brag on you are outdoing most others with your raws testing via HPLC.

 

[NeoAnabolics]

New batch of Test Cyp Raw for Test Cyp 100mg/ml batch.

 

[readalot]

New batch of Test Cyp Raw for Test Cyp 100mg/ml batch.

View attachment 315163

GD dude. Appreciate your honesty and integrity. Good man. Thanks for sharing and your testing.

 

[keenpen]

Does the purity percentage matter? It's just used for the final weight calculation to accurately dose the finished oil? Do I understand this?

Neo, you're great man. Thanks for sharing these results.

 

[T-Bagger]

Does the purity percentage matter? It's just used for the final weight calculation to accurately dose the finished oil? Do I understand this?

Neo, you're great man. Thanks for sharing these results.

Ideally you want higher purity, so with a lower purity, you would overcompensate to get closer to target. I’ve actually always wondered what makes it less pure.

I believe it’s due to contamination during the synthesis process, the presence of impurities from starting materials, or improper storage conditions. I read that variations in the chemical structure during synthesis can also affect its purity.

 

[Sampei]

Ideally you want higher purity, so with a lower purity, you would overcompensate to get closer to target. I’ve actually always wondered what makes it less pure.

I believe it’s due to contamination during the synthesis process, the presence of impurities from starting materials, or improper storage conditions. I read that variations in the chemical structure during synthesis can also affect its purity.

For some hydroscopic raw, I believe one is Anadrol, humidity can affect purity big time.

 

[readalot]

Ideally you want higher purity, so with a lower purity, you would overcompensate to get closer to target. I’ve actually always wondered what makes it less pure.

I believe it’s due to contamination during the synthesis process, the presence of impurities from starting materials, or improper storage conditions. I read that variations in the chemical structure during synthesis can also affect its purity.

Sampei had a good recent example of BU by GCMS. That was a pretty cut and dry example of lower purity with only API and starting material.

I think you've got the other situations well covered.

 

[Sampei]

Sampei had a good recent example of BU by GCMS. That was a pretty cut and dry example of lower purity with only API and starting material.

I think you've got the other situations well covered.

Once more thank you to @bigMoJo that helped me out funding the GCMS test