Enhanced Testing Database

When the trash starts claiming they speak for "groups" you know they're full of shit, trying to drum up clout and reflective of the way the small clique of QSC thread bullies operate,

It was the same dynamic when the GLP haters tried to shut down those discussions.

The absolute same can be said for all the QSC glazers that will dismiss absolutely any very real issue that comes up because god forbid someone talks bad about their source and they wont be able to feel good about saving 5$ on a vial of test.

People bringing up the very real limitations and risks associated with GLP1s dont make them haters. Just because you are firmly in the "GLP1s are the greatest medical advancement ever" camp doesnt make everyone counter to you is a hater.
 
Hey @Millard, I'd appreciate it if you didn't ban anyone who participated here in the last few days. Bans would be a shame. It's pretty clear this place is their world, not mine. If there was any significant support for this we would have seen it by now. The last 10 pages here tell the story. I've taken this testing bit about as far I will be able to. Perhaps someone with better approach can salvage something out of it.

@Spaceman Spiff it's clear we will never get on and you said some shitty stuff about me. I should have not pressed you on the sourcing. IRL maybe it would be different. I wish you no ill will. I wish you health. Good luck to you.

Take it easy everyone and hope everyone gets the gainz they set out for in 2025.

Seriously, you posted the above less than 12 hours ago. Bipolar much?
 
Hey @Millard, I'd appreciate it if you didn't ban anyone who participated here in the last few days. Bans would be a shame. It's pretty clear this place is their world, not mine. If there was any significant support for this we would have seen it by now. The last 10 pages here tell the story. I've taken this testing bit about as far I will be able to. Perhaps someone with better approach can salvage something out of it.

@Spaceman Spiff it's clear we will never get on and you said some shitty stuff about me. I should have not pressed you on the sourcing. IRL maybe it would be different. I wish you no ill will. I wish you health. Good luck to you.

Take it easy everyone and hope everyone gets the gainz they set out for in 2025.
Revised ...

Hey @Millard. I'd appreciate it if you didn't ban anyone who participated here in the last few days. Bans would be a shame. The last 10 pages here plus pp. 562-564 of the Opti thread tell the story. It's pretty clear this place is their world, not mine. If there was any significant support for this we would have seen it by now. I've taken this testing bit about as far I will be able to. Perhaps someone with better approach can salvage something out of it.

@Spaceman Spiff it's clear we will never get on and you said some shitty stuff about me. I should have not pressed you on the sourcing. IRL maybe it would be different. I wish you no ill will. I wish you health. Good luck to you.

Take it easy everyone and hope everyone gets the gainz they set out for in 2025.
Absolutely. You have no grace. None.



You're right. I have no grace
 
You're right. I have no grace

Correct.

You have the same pattern of behavior time and time again. It won't change because you posted this message. Even after the past 2 bans.

You are just buying time until your next childish tantrum.

If I get a ban for my recent behavior, then so be it. You should have one too.

As of right now, I still plan to pull back from sharing HPLC testing with this forum. So no one will accuse me of sourcing. Therefore no one can draw a conclusion of me sourcing or it "affecting my cashflow".
 
its-alll-so-tiresome-tired.gif
 
That's my point. If you are going to accuse me of sourcing based off of my posted tests. Why would I share anymore tests?


Its on you too.
I see you edited this so let me respond. I did not ask you if you source based on the testing your shared in isolation. Get it? That wasn't the potential tell. But good try with your attempts to obfuscate the situation once more.

It's not on me, period. Answer the question and get back to your altruism. Simple.

You inserted yourself into this position by attacking me and offering nothing constructive. Just said all of this was pointless.
 
I see you edited this so let me respond. I did not ask you if you source based on the testing your shared in isolation. Get it? That wasn't the potential tell. But good try with your attempts to obfuscate the situation once more.
Took you long enough to state it, good job trying to change it around.

I already get it, I wont share testing.
 
I see you edited this so let me respond. I did not ask you if you source based on the testing your shared in isolation. Get it? That wasn't the potential tell. But good try with your attempts to obfuscate the situation once more.

It's not on me, period. Answer the question and get back to your altruism. Simple.
No you don't get to walk away from that accusation:


And you go accusing me of being a source mf?
1736869242223.webp
 
No you don't get to walk away from that accusation:


And you go accusing me of being a source mf?
View attachment 312063
You are a selective sick MFer!

I see @musclesiege edited his post where he confused what you said with the Crido fellow.

@musclesiege can easily attest to that. I responded to his comment thinking he was calling you and crido one in the same.


It must have been Narta that made that point, there’s a lot of messages on 2 boards about the same stuff happening .

See i go out of my way to set the record straight and share the whole set of facts. I'm done interacting with you. Your tricks don't work with me. My fault for engaging with you to begin with.

You seem to confuse the words question and accusation.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top