Spaceman Spiff
Well-known Member
Eat dick @musclesiege
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Enhanced Testing Database
- Thread starter readalot
- Start date
musclesiege
Member
This mouth vag entry only, besides who wants cocktail weenies?
musclesiege
Member
I bet @readalot wouldn’t tell me to eat a dick. He may ask me to comb through his 7000 messages to find the one I read months ago that I referenced but at least my mouth wouldn’t be violated. Read>Space
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known Member
Good, now you can stroke eachother while you are hitting quote on each other's "articles"
iris
Well-known Member
All's s well that ends well, then.
If someone I didn't want to work with invited me to go to the office and work on a project voluntarily on my own time, I wouldn't do it either.
I don't know if I'd even respond to the invitation. Maybe I'd send them a courtesy message to politely decline.
You know what I wouldn't do?
I wouldn't get up early and go to the office to deliver the message in person. And I certainly wouldn't stick around all day telling them how much I disliked working with them. And accompanying them to their appointments all day interfering with their work? Definitely, not.
Why all that effort?
If I supported the project but just didn't like working them, I wouldn't do this.
If I supported the project but just didn't want to put in the work, I wouldn't do this.
If I didn't support the project and wanted to thwart it, I would do this.
I don't see the harm of setting @readalot loose all by himself to hold sources accountable in the sources' respective threads.
He can pressure the sources to do the specific testing that he wants done. The sources can agree. They can disagree. And they can also explain and defend their decisions what ever they may be.
Why does anyone else need to answer on behalf of the sources or otherwise give them reasons not to perform additional analytical testing? That is on them.
Why would anyone want to give the sources an easy way out for addressing this question?
So many people complain that there are not enough people doing their part to hold sources accountable. And they are right to call out all the members who are consistently and aggressively defending and running interference for sources from consumer complaints/criticisms.
If people don't want to help pressure sources to do these additional analytical tests, that is fine. Don't thwart others' efforts.
If sources don't want to do additional analytical tests, that is fine. Don't answer on their behalf.
Allow the sources to answer/explain decisions. And the sources can be held directly accountable for them.
Doesn't this seem reasonable?
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known Member
You are right. Not many people are holding the sources accountable. We can see that with some of the big market people who have entered the forum while they protect giant sources. Don't test products, assume it's all good to go.
I just feel like this is the complete opposite direction of those people and he is an "advanced troll".
-The fact he came here wanting to "gold name" or title.he was drooling at this when he first came ...
-The fact he is not a UGL user. He hasn't used any products himself.
-If he truly wanted to ensure safe product, why wouldn't he order it and test what he has on hand as well? He has been here for over a year. Why would he not submit any testing from himself?
-I'm sure legality is a concern for him right? If so, then why even look at the illegal market if so?
-His whole presence of why he is here doesn't make sense to me.
-Constantly window shopping... "I may, possibly one, day, not really inject a vial of UGL test"
So are his motives harm reduction? Or is it simply because he is bored/is an " advanced troll"?
In the end, it doesn't matter. Just wanted to tell you why a majority of us don't care for him.
I still don't think his enhanced testing will do much, other than date collection. But overall, we hate the messenger.
Last edited:
Spaceman Spiff
Well-known Member
Similar threads
