MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Fackts about Analyzer
- Thread starter mercury
- Start date
Some dude is claiming Analyzer as fake...and questioning his methods.
He's spammed like 5 threads about Analzyer
Looks like @master.on is the culprit haha.
master.on
New Member
I'm totally unbiased, you can have that for sure.
So far, his claimed testing methods don't make sense
and I've just scrutinized the uppermost layer so far.
MisterSuperGod
Well-known Member
They must make some sense if he can identify a blind sample. @mercury has gotten to you, hasn't he!?
Blink your red LED once if the answer is yes, blink twice for no. Work with me here, robot!
While you have raised some points of contention regarding Analyzer assays, many include as least some graphic data, only HE is qualified to respond and I certainly hope he does.
However SIMEC is a certified ENVIRONMENTAL LAB which is an
entirely different beast than AAS
Is SIMEC credible IDK bc much like Jano next to none of their results are supported by graphic, or procedural data.
However I do trust Millard and until that changes I’ll remain hesitant to question SIMECS narrative reports.
Jano in the other hand is a
proven FRAUD and those who believe otherwise are either not familiar with his history on Meso,
are spoon fed fools, or are a part
of his counterfeiting lab scheme.
However as a LABMAX shill members should take your criticism of Analyzer with a
grain of salt!
^^^this^^^ come on guys isn't there enough dumb shit going on here? Why we bumping year old retarded threads?
master.on
New Member
How do you know they're not multi-handle shills pretending to be "satisfied customers"?
Simple answer: you can't. That's how the Internet works.
I hope @Analyzer does respond too.
As for SIMEC I can, and will take an unbiased look at their reports too.
Please read answer to @MisterSuperGod above. I'm not pointing fingers YET.
Remember that @jano took like 2 years to be uncovered as fraud, remember?
Den84
Well-known Member
Analizer is ok, we have analyzed some products, with my friends, without mentioning the content, when the brand is good the result come back good
When it involves UGL or the testing of UGL products due diligence is the best course.
Folk must understand no analytical lab is any better than
the capabilities of the testor AND the STANDARDS they use for comparison.
I can only tell you I spent well over a year trying to assay AAS
with a PHD fella and the results
never seemed consistent or satisfactory.
We had all the solvents, the technology, the standards and the education and still could NOT get it right.
Jim
Folk must understand no analytical lab is any better than
the capabilities of the testor AND the STANDARDS they use for comparison.
I can only tell you I spent well over a year trying to assay AAS
with a PHD fella and the results
never seemed consistent or satisfactory.
We had all the solvents, the technology, the standards and the education and still could NOT get it right.
Jim
Athlete127
New Member
Only issue I had with anaylzer that made me scratch my head was I sent him anavar and he said it was proviron,winstrol mix... I tested the same batch with the labmax anavar test and it tested for anavar on all three tests...
wsw16
Member
Labmax lol can’t believe people still waste their time and money on that
Athlete127
New Member
LabMax has never failed me on the anavar Winstrol uv test. Plus I’ve put women client on same brand and I think they would know if they were taking 20mg Winstrol.
Analtzer also said my halo was overdosed by 18 mg.... why the fuck would a lab overdose halo and undercut something else ?
I sent the same sample to the Swiss lab. Awaiting result.
Last edited:
Labmax is a joke and can be interpreted differently from one person to the next.
I’m not saying @Analyzer is free from error but I would trust him over labmax any day of the week.
Now with that said I don’t know why labs do or don’t do what they supposed to do. Human error most likely weather intentions are good or bad.
What swiss lab? The swiss lab? And hopefully that can shed some light on it.
mands
You must mean Simec...that's the Swiss lab Millard uses for gear testing for ABL.
Oh ok, Simec came to mind from reading Millard's posts though.
MisterSuperGod
Well-known Member
They probably (almost certainly) don't test raws, so something as simple as Test E could be half dosed.
i doubt any lab that's interested in longevity would purposely underdose something just to overdose another.
As for the Halo, i'm willing to bet they didn't properly measure and/or mix the powder and filler. So you may have a bunch of underdosed tabs in there too.
i'm very interested in seeing your Swiss lab results.
Don't leave us hanging when they come in.
Similar threads
