Fackts about Analyzer

[colossus25]

Edit: @colossus25

@Analyzer explained his method of obtaining standard quality compound here



Laboratory testing of AASs, GH, peptides...

In the following post @RThoads comfirmed that this method will create an acceptable standard

IV

Awesome i didn't even see that! All we need left from analyzer is a few photos of the equipment used and i will send him samples immediately.

 

[Bradly]

Edit: @colossus25

@Analyzer explained his method of obtaining standard quality compound here



Laboratory testing of AASs, GH, peptides...

In the following post @RThoads comfirmed that this method will create an acceptable standard

IV

thanks brah
yeah, this is like 3 threads on mercury vs analyzer

 

[Bradly]

@mercury
when I first joined here I looked up to you. You contributed to this board daily.

Im not sure whats going on with you on a personally, maybe your feeling left behind or something.

your making an ass of yourself now. I feel embarrassed for you. you need to stop now. You are on your way to joining a club that you really dont want to belong to.

 

[ironwill1951]

go back to your silly black lights and fluorescent shit, now that's science,

 

[mercury]

@mercury
when I first joined here I looked up to you. You contributed to this board daily.

Im not sure whats going on with you on a personally, maybe your feeling left behind or something.

your making an ass of yourself now. I feel embarrassed for you. you need to stop now. You are on your way to joining a club that you really dont want to belong to.

I am feeling embarrassed for you too. You get fucked by scammers selling you fake gear

some scammers would go even to such extend to come out with fake lab reports. I caught for example NAPS with fake reports.

Then you have Analyzers coming here with no proof and no established credibility that the work presented here is worth anything.

He simply digged the hole himself with the presented report which is full of garbage and discredited him right away.

Sorry but I will stay with Simec it is worth for me paying a little extra to be safe.

 

[MindlessWork]

I am feeling embarrassed for you too. You get fucked by scammers selling you fake gear

some scammers would go even to such extend to come out with fake lab reports. I caught for example NAPS with fake reports.

Then you have Analyzers coming here with no proof and no established credibility that the work presented here is worth anything.

He simply digged the hole himself with the presented report which is full of garbage and discredited him right away.

Sorry but I will stay with Simec it is worth for me paying a little extra to be safe.

Simec is an accredited lab yes, while Analyzer isn't but that doesn't necessarily mean Analyzer is doing half-assed studies. I for one would welcome 2 identical samples get sent out one to Simec, the other to Analyzer and comparing the results that come back from each.

 

[colossus25]

I am feeling embarrassed for you too. You get fucked by scammers selling you fake gear

some scammers would go even to such extend to come out with fake lab reports. I caught for example NAPS with fake reports.

Then you have Analyzers coming here with no proof and no established credibility that the work presented here is worth anything.

He simply digged the hole himself with the presented report which is full of garbage and discredited him right away.

Sorry but I will stay with Simec it is worth for me paying a little extra to be safe.

SIMEC isn't accepting non-licensed pharmaceuticals any more numb nuts....

 

[colossus25]

Every post this guy makes just shows how unknowleagble and uninformed he is.

 

[MindlessWork]

SIMEC isn't accepting non-licensed pharmaceuticals any more numb nuts....

Only from USA they are not accepting samples according to Millard (if I recall correctly). If there's someone in the EU that could get the samples to Simec then it might work.

 

[colossus25]

Not to mention you were the same guy bashing simec. This ass hat is a walking talking contradiction.

 

[colossus25]

Only from USA they are not accepting samples according to Millard (if I recall correctly). If there's someone in the EU that could get the samples to Simec then it might work.

I looked into just now they aren't accepting any foreign non- pharmaceutical

 

[MindlessWork]

I looked into just now they aren't accepting any foreign non- pharmaceutical

OK thanks for clarifying that

 

[colossus25]

OK thanks for clarifying that

You could be right but according to the email they sent everyone it says they arent accepting any foreign samples indefinitely.

 

[MindlessWork]

You could be right but according to the email they sent everyone it says they arent accepting any foreign samples indefinitely.

Maybe @Millard Baker can clarify that (sorry for tagging you Millard into this shitty thread...)

 

[mands]

Our boy mercury already tried starting crap about simec here:

any update if Simec accepts from USA

Millard had to call him out on this thread as well. SIMEC clearly states they will not accept any samples for testing unless they come from their country. But, he clearly states to stay with SIMEC to be safe fully knowing you can't send it them. lol

mands

 

[Wunderpus]

I have 2 different pharmaceutical products from a US pharmacy that I would be willing to send in, and have him test. We know they are dosed properly, as one came from a CVS and one from a Walgreen's here in good ol' USA.... Would that ease any concern? There would be no way for @Analyzer to know what these products are, or their dosing before testing.....

 

[master.on]

I am feeling embarrassed for you too. You get fucked by scammers selling you fake gear

some scammers would go even to such extend to come out with fake lab reports. I caught for example NAPS with fake reports.

Then you have Analyzers coming here with no proof and no established credibility that the work presented here is worth anything.

He simply digged the hole himself with the presented report which is full of garbage and discredited him right away.

Sorry but I will stay with Simec it is worth for me paying a little extra to be safe.

Even SIMEC (or any other real lab) refuses to test samples for which they don't have reference standards, or testing methods
but somehow @Analyzer claims to have them all, even for steroids or esters which were never approved for human or veterinary use = little scientific info available for testing them.

 

[The Inedible Bulk]

I have 2 different pharmaceutical products from a US pharmacy that I would be willing to send in, and have him test. We know they are dosed properly, as one came from a CVS and one from a Walgreen's here in good ol' USA.... Would that ease any concern? There would be no way for @Analyzer to know what these products are, or their dosing before testing.....

What would be even better is to specifically taint them on purpose and send it in. Say you have pharm ADex, send him one pack of 100% untouched ADex, and another pack that's 75% Adex and 25% UGL SDrol powder.

 

[MythotiK]

Even SIMEC (or any other real lab) refuses to test samples for which they don't have reference standards, or testing methods
but somehow @Analyzer claims to have them all, even for steroids or esters which were never approved for human or veterinary use = little scientific info available for testing them.

Not true, I emailed him two weeks ago and he didn't have 3 out of the five standards needed to test what I wanted, so...........

 

[Steve84]

Not true, I emailed him two weeks ago and he didn't have 3 out of the five standards needed to test what I wanted, so...........

I've sent him a blend before...
He detected all 4 substances.

I've sent 3 vials all unlabeled and he's identified them. 2 out of 3 he was almost bang on label claim.