MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Fackts about Analyzer

mercury said:
it won't do unless you had it tested and know already the test results.

send to Simec at the same time then we can compare test results.

he already fucked up with primo giving two conflicting test results.
Click to expand...
He explained why and go to the thread that he just explained again after I asked as did others.

You are done here dude.

mands
 
mercury said:
it won't do unless you had it tested and know already the test results.

send to Simec at the same time then we can compare test results.

he already fucked up with primo giving two conflicting test results.
Click to expand...

that might be true, but I know what its supposed to be. now removing boldenone from the equation for obvious reasons, there is still a laundry list of shit it could be. what if I sent 4 different compounds and he identifies 4/4? $40 to assay my shit, I blew that on cheap sunglasses today. worst case scenario I wont play scratchers for a couple weeks.
 
Bradly said:
that might be true, but I know what its supposed to be. now removing boldenone from the equation for obvious reasons, there is still a laundry list of shit it could be. what if I sent 4 different compounds and he identifies 4/4? $40 to assay my shit, I blew that on cheap sunglasses today. worst case scenario I wont play scratchers for a couple weeks.
Click to expand...

next time he will be careful with the report, I am sure he read the thread and learn the lesson.

this time Analyzer digged his own hole with the report

it will be difficult if not impossible to catch him with fake report next time unless you had independent testing to compare.

if he has access to lab it is easy to identify with GC/MS and make up the purity

I know lab with GC/MS, send me a sample they can identify, if it is for example primo the expected concentration would be 100mg /ml

I can identify , confirm that it is primo and I can just tell you that it is for example 96 mg/ml
 
Last edited:
mercury said:
next time he will be careful with the report, I am sure he read the thread and learn the lesson.

this time Analyzer digged his own hole with the report

it will be difficult if not impossible to catch him with fake report next time unless you had independent testing to compare.
Click to expand...
if that particular service becomes available to me, and I can afford it, of course I would have analyzers work checked.
now I might not be correct, but that would be a true double blind test correct?
further, regardless of the results, I intend to share my results with my source. And if it has merit, I'll share their response as well, as they have had their own testing done.
 
Bradly said:
if that particular service becomes available to me, and I can afford it, of course I would have analyzers work checked.
now I might not be correct, but that would be a true double blind test correct?
further, regardless of the results, I intend to share my results with my source. And if it has merit, I'll share their response as well, as they have had their own testing done.
Click to expand...

This can work with a source that is willing to pay for Simec
Testing and then the member can pay for @Analyzer testing thus allowing the source to bear the larger cost and we can begin to feel more comfortable with Analyzer's testing if the results are similar. I already know they will never be exact. We do not live in a perfect world.

IV
 
Bradly said:
if that particular service becomes available to me, and I can afford it, of course I would have analyzers work checked.
now I might not be correct, but that would be a true double blind test correct?
further, regardless of the results, I intend to share my results with my source. And if it has merit, I'll share their response as well, as they have had their own testing done.
Click to expand...

when you look at the report it must be big lab which has a lot strict rules and controls like environmental control lab on national level,

he does not operate from small private lab.

I do not think that he can order officially standards without going through official channels (the boss) and run side jobs

then having all prepared without being noticed. I do not believe that they will allow him to do side jobs.

but just jumping on GC/MS and doing quick run without being noticed, identifying the substance and then just making up the purity, he can do this.
 
mercury said:
I think that you meant of you and bunch of other dumbasses, who think that they have pride but will do anything to just save face now.

they have no argument left but calling names left only
Click to expand...

I only see one person calling names
 
mercury said:
next time he will be careful with the report, I am sure he read the thread and learn the lesson.

this time Analyzer digged his own hole with the report

it will be difficult if not impossible to catch him with fake report next time unless you had independent testing to compare.

if he has access to lab it is easy to identify with GC/MS and make up the purity

I know lab with GC/MS, send me a sample they can identify, if it is for example primo the expected concentration would be 100mg /ml

I can identify , confirm that it is primo and I can just tell you that it is for example 96 mg/ml
Click to expand...
Wtf nobody here is going to send you shit man get the fuck out. And what a fucking hypocrite piece of shit you are, first you said that gc/ms is useless and now "you know labs" that uses it? You're so full of shit man lmfaoo what kind of a dumbass contradicts himself so badly? You literally bashed analyzer for using gc/ms and now so conveniently you know an accredited lab that uses it? Lies after lies man hahaha
 
I hate to point out the fact that your calling names as well.

in the discussion of standards.
I talked about this once before: couldnt one use a known good sample and compare against that?
and
because were dealing with solutions, couldnt someone with an advanced chemistry degree couldnt increase the concentration of a solution. I know its an oil based solution,and more raw cant be added. the only option would be to remove some oil. excuse me Im writing as I think this out. Personally Id crash the solution remove some oil then bring it back to solution. thoughts?
@Analyzer ?
 
colossus25 said:
Wtf nobody here is going to send you shit man get the fuck out. And what a fucking hypocrite piece of shit you are, first you said that gc/ms is useless and now "you know labs" that uses it? You're so full of shit man lmfaoo what kind of a dumbass contradicts himself so badly? You literally bashed analyzer for using gc/ms and now so conveniently you know an accredited lab that uses it? Lies after lies man hahaha
Click to expand...

just one more time you show that you do not have clue what you are talking about,

other people read and simply laugh how dumb you are you are.

you shill for Analyzer and just come with anything you can just throw at me but no real argument we can talk about
 
mercury said:
just one more time you show that you do not have clue what you are talking about,

other people read and simply laugh how dumb you are you are.

you shill for Analyzer and just come with anything you can just throw at me but no real argument we can talk about
Click to expand...
Idk what im talking about? Lmfaoo dude did you take your medicine today because obviously you are having a psychotic break. You went on the @Analyzer thread and VERY CLEARLY protested analyzers testing method and called it useless. Now all of a sudden you know a lab that uses gc/ms and want us to "send you some samples"? Hahahahahaha again i just exposed how full of fucking shit you are. You know absolutely nothing about forensic science.
 
colossus25 said:
Idk what im talking about? Lmfaoo dude did you take your medicine today because obviously you are having a psychotic break. You went on the @Analyzer thread and VERY CLEARLY protested analyzers testing method and called it useless. Now all of a sudden you know a lab that uses gc/ms and want us to "send you some samples"? Hahahahahaha again i just exposed how full of fucking shit you are. You know absolutely nothing about forensic science.
Click to expand...

you just prove again that you do not have clue what we are talking about

Jim_Carrey_Dumb-and-Dumber-Inside.jpg
 
Bradly said:
anybody want to comment on using known good samples as standards, or manipulating poor samples to use as standards
Click to expand...
Its very possible he had the standard before hand from previous testing and was able to preform any calibration he needed. Saying where he obtained the standard could pose security concerns for him, seeing as they don't just hand out AAS standards like hot cakes. Also he says he used an identifying method i wasn't familiar with and he would need to further explain it. We talked about it in the last thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Type-IIx
What is the Meaning of "Genetics" for Bodybuilding?
Replies
0
Views
152
Type-IIx
Type-IIx
sigma_pharma
SIGMA PHARMACEUTICALS
Replies
18
Views
4K
DannyT73
DannyT73
janoshik
HCG discourse
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
Pinnacle Elements
Pinnacle Elements
H
Evidence of Renal Toxicity and Ineffectiveness of EQ: Boldenone Undecylenate
Replies
15
Views
4K
borkies
borkies
Driada Medical
  • Sticky
MESO-Rx Sponsor Driada Medical
208 209 210
Replies
4K
Views
505K
b3n
B

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top