Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
how so. It seems he would want batch numbers himself. would save himself alot of trouble if they do have a quality problem@rpbb ....unfortunately TP is right though.
They do it for themselves. But my question to you is will you take their word for it? We all know the answer to it already.
No shit smartass. I wrote that in my post. Read much?They do it for themselves. But my question to you is will you take their word for it? We all know the answer to it already.
Don't forget assclown, you're the fuck that sold GH with 0.25 iu in a 10iu vial. Why the fuck are you here? I thought you came to figure it out? Now you're being a smart ass? You just fucked up chink!
They do it for themselves. But my question to you is will you take their word for it? We all know the answer to it already.
No shit smartass. I wrote that in my post. Read much?
The point is, why not release them if they do them anyway? AND, add batch numbers to the vials.
If you want to be a smartass, go back to PM.
Don't forget assclown, you're the fuck that sold GH with 0.25 iu in a 10iu vial. Why the fuck are you here? I thought you came to figure it out? Now you're being a smart ass? You just fucked up chink!
Wow at 5'10 180p you racist little bitch I'd shut that dick sucker real quick bitch boy! How bout you gtfoh twig!No shit smartass. I wrote that in my post. Read much?
The point is, why not release them if they do them anyway? AND, add batch numbers to the vials.
If you want to be a smartass, go back to PM.
Don't forget assclown, you're the fuck that sold GH with 0.25 iu in a 10iu vial. Why the fuck are you here? I thought you came to figure it out? Now you're being a smart ass? You just fucked up chink!
My Interpretation; lot or batch numbers can NOT be used to correlate the quality of generic GH products.
That is of course unless you would like to elaborate on HOW or WHY "they do it for themselves?" Sounds like a proprietary "secret" LOL!
Moreover bc the dose/response relationship bt GH and IGF varies considerably among individuals, the most reliable measure of GH quality IS AN Amino Acid Assay.
To that end your suggestion serum IGF is a reasonable substitute in for vitro AA testing is being disingenuous at best. And your first post on this thread mentioned "being honest", right.
Hmm, would not these results be considered biased by some (and it's not pure coincidence such accusations are always levied by UGL resalers) IF I used GH, been THERE done THAT, lol!
read my response carefully. I did not mention batch numbers. I wrote about lab essays. And i agree batch numbers can be useful personally but look at the skepticism regarding it here.You're kidding, right, asking for batch numbers is basic. Let up with the attitude
p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120%; }
1) All you have to do it test a few vials from different customers and see tf they come to the same results. I see a lot of skepticism on this board. I feel this board is very anti-generics and some members do not believe in generics at all.
2) If one has made up ones mind that this is the case than arguments are of no use. But if one has an open mind than arguments are useful.
3) They do it to check quality of a batch. Like any manufacturer would do so before they release the product into the market.
4) Is it not better for the end user or the board to do it independently?
5) And no it is no proprietary secret but again I ask if that information is posted would you trust it? I think not
1) The fact "you" means the consumer must perform these "tests" rather than the UGL itself
is the genesis for the well earned "skepticism". The latter would be much more apparent if "source boards" were less inclined to censor contrary commentary elsewhere, IMO.
2) what you call an "open mind" many here refer to as evidence and they are worlds apart
3) fantastic now if "Grey" manufactures would only POST the analytical evidence they are
using to ensure LOT "A" is indeed LOT "A" rather than LOT "B" we might could discuss something much more objective and transparent than an "open mind and or honesty".
4) This is the same old argument
used by UGLs as a scapegoat AND
the proof exists on this thread after only THREE samples were assayed bc someone didn't like what they saw!
"Is it better" .... absolutely NOT, the results of BOTH the UGL and
CONSUMERS should be posting data, as it generates an open and free discussion and THAT helps EVERYONE
So rather than posting THEIR OWN DATA such naysayers make every effort to cast doubt in the minds of consumers by shooting both the message and/or the messenger.
5) would I "trust" the data cited by UGL vendors; to be frank I DONT KNOW bc I've NEVER seen ANY. HoweverI do suspect citing legitimate results would be more apt to enhance an UGLs credibility than NOTHING!
Of course this pussy comes to TP's rescue. Defending a seller now?Wow at 5'10 180p you racist little bitch I'd shut that dick sucker real quick bitch boy! How bout you gtfoh twig!
Of course this pussy comes to TP's rescue. Defending a seller now?
sorry for being ignorant . May i ask where i have shown attitude? Infact one or two people have been rude to me here and i have chosen to ignore it. So do kindly let me know where my attitude is so that i can self correct myself. Iam here not to fight or show attitude to people. Infact to the contrary on my main board i hardly talk. I just came here to clear somethings. But if i see people think that i show attitude than you are right i should leave the board and stick to my main one.I'll try and be the voice of reason here (I know, weird). TP, lose the attitude, if you want to contribute to this thread, please do it in a respectful manner, and no sarcasm. This isn't PM. If you can't handle that, don't say anything at all. Alpha, while agree with your initial argument, make your point with no racial connotations. This is an extremely important thread to the members here, and I'm really looking forward to the testing results.
Alright point noted.Well @tp2013 we would definetlt love to see the manufacturer lab assay test. Even if they could be biased they are still test and demonstrate that they do test something
Let us decide if they are biased r not. Becaue the whole story of: they are not posted because they are biased... it looks shady, like you have access of no assay because they indeed do not test it.
I'm trying to explain what maybe dr Jim is saying.