The blue one, right bottom corner are ansomone
Do you live in China?
我不
Wǒ bù
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The blue one, right bottom corner are ansomone
Do you live in China?
Is that result screwed up?
Is that result screwed up?
ONCE AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW THE SAMPLE SOURCES or THEIR IDENTITY.
Yea I know the graph is rotated. That's happens occasionally when the data is printed on a "worksheet"(AKA a spread sheet).
The only other viable option would require sacrificing some of the "raw data".
SAMPLE # 13
ONCE AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW THE SAMPLE SOURCES or THEIR IDENTITY.
Yea I know the graph is rotated. That's happens occasionally when the data is printed on a "worksheet"(AKA a spread sheet).
The only other viable option would require sacrificing some of the "raw data".
SAMPLE # 13
This is TP black top.
I'm pretty sure about it.
And it does confirm what TP has said about the last batch.
This is quite good news.
Now we need to find out what happened to that grey vial. Or if it was indeed TP grey or not.
Man I'm starting to get excited on my blacks order ahahaha!
Before someone jump in saying: one vial means nothing... I fucking now! But one good damn dosed vial is better then none!
This is TP black top.
I'm pretty sure about it.
And it does confirm what TP has said about the last batch.
This is quite good news.
Now we need to find out what happened to that grey vial. Or if it was indeed TP grey or not.
Man I'm starting to get excited on my blacks order ahahaha!
Before someone jump in saying: one vial means nothing... I fucking now! But one good damn dosed vial is better then none!
How many subjects or data points, are typically required for a scientific study to have "power", regardless of outcome?
TEN!!
So I quess all of TP's "Greys" are shit but those "Blacks" are the best GH "discovery" since the invention of a the model T.
If you "know" then why but such lame thoughts on an EVIDENCE BASED THREAD.
How many subjects or data points, are typically required for a scientific study to have "power", regardless of outcome?
TEN!!!!!!!!!
At best a "pilot study", with a sample size of even FIVE data points, may improve ones ability to prognosticate outcome, in this case GH quality, with a lot of grey (no pun intended) in between!
Sampei, it's Jim's thread, and he's doing the testing, so he gets to say whatever he wants. The test result is good news (might pick some up myself), but like the anaboliclab testing program, Millard was always careful to say the first round of tests mean nothing.Jim, take it easy man. You will have a fit sooner or later.
I fucking said that I well know that one sample means nothing!!!!
But it's nice to have some kind of verification! Did I say: let's all buy black tops? Let's end this thread we got our answers?
I was just cheering for the result, it's positive and make me hope for the possibility that they indeed do lab test the black to assure quality.
Can't we have a chill conversation once in a while?
God you always shouting
This sample was purchased anonymously by a MESO member.ONCE AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW THE SAMPLE SOURCES or THEIR IDENTITY.
Yea I know the graph is rotated. That's happens occasionally when the data is printed on a "worksheet"(AKA a spread sheet).
The only other viable option would require sacrificing some of the "raw data".
SAMPLE # 13
This sample was purchased anonymously by a MESO member.
This vial is TP's Blacktop Meditrope.
mands
This sample was purchased anonymously by a MESO member.