MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
- Thread starter Dr JIM
- Start date
DickySmalls
Member
You're telling me... I bought 20 of the kits. I hope they don't test 0.25 IU like the other guy's vial.
Correct the factory does it themselves and we do it ourselves. But i need to see why we have differences. Dr. Jims results came out to 4.58 mg. .For us other than #10 and #11 batches rest all came to 5 or more than 5mg per vial ( according to our testing). so a difference of at least .5mg ( unless the number on vial is #10 or #11)between Dr. Jims results and ours. Dr. Jim can you confirm what was the number written on the blacktop vial. Also may i ask if iam reading this correct. Is purity at 97.1 percent? It is important to us. Thank you
We have plenty of grey tops coming in for testing. We will get to the bottom of things.
mands
No rush brother, I have all the time in the world.
So so far there is samples...1,2,3,13,14 correct. Or did I miss all those in betweeen 3 and 13?
I'm guessing requested samples were given number assignments by the testers. The reason behind bigger numbers being released before smaller would be due to shipment times; 13/14 made it to testing before 4-12.
If you look at the results, the mg and iu portion of it shows /div meaning there was an error on the raw data/spreadsheet when the formula tried to run and display on the test results page
DickySmalls
Member
Unless it's 0 mg trying to divide by zero and throwing the error?
That could also be a possibility. But that would have to mean there is absolutely nothing else in the vial that was measured as well
It was starch. No gh was present and it's completely bunk... Fantastic packing too. Looked like a million bucks on the outside. Worth nothing on the inside.
mands
Attachments
Wow, crazy stuff, good to know
LOL
Some "bros" just can't resist the temptation of speculation.
DickySmalls
Member
So it is 0 mg or is mands wrong that it's totally bunk? I'm confused now.
Post YOUR testing as I have done or there's nothing to discuss!
can you please let me know the purity of sample in the result. as i seem to be over looking it. Also may i know the number that was printed on the vial. Thank you.
And what makes you believe a "purity" assay was conducted exclusive of an AAA?
As I've mentioned I don't know anything about what was printed on the vial, (except #13) that's MANDS area which I believe has already been cited.
Shady mother fuckers dude. Again, thx for the testing. Proving to be worth it, no doubt.
Mands is correct.
0 mg=starch=bunk
Iam not assuming it was conducted.But i think it is also a big concern other than MG in a vial.. So from your response can I interpret that it was no done?
