I meant no disrespect. It was a question for my own understanding. I have enough brother here on meso to explain what I need to look at and what to throw in the trash. I just wanted to understand your testing process.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
- Thread starter Dr JIM
- Start date
No offense WP but are you serious, I never even heard of "Black Tops" until one week ago, lol
MANDS may be able to do what your suggesting but not yours truly.
Last edited:
I wanted to add that I have been off gh for around 3 months. I will be getting base line igf-1 test preformed and then I will be start a generic GH... Stay tuned.
mands
I wouldn't go as far as to say @Dr JIM is well versed in generic GH brands. I myself am.
mands
LOL, you're fucking smart enough to recognize the Pcom logo, Jim! Maybe I am overestimating your exposure to the generic market
Also, it's important to note, Black Tops matter, too.
janoshik
Subscriber
Mr. Doctor Jim, which excessive amounts of glycine are you talking about, if I may ask?
Making this whole argument easier to understand for community would certainly help to make this project even more successfull
LOL, you're fucking smart enough to recognize the Pcom logo, Jim! Maybe I am overestimating your exposure to the generic market
Also, it's important to note, Black Tops matter, too.
Really and WHY would I recognize such a logo, or care enough to even look for it.
My exposure is almost exclusively limited to TESTING the stuff and MANDS has acquired close to 95%
of those samples assayed.
That's like suggesting I recognized the Argo starch sample bc I cook a lot
Ha, I was simply stating IF you wanted to, it'd take you all of about 30 seconds to realize what about 50% of the brands were. Jim, you know i'm not worried about you pulling some BS with these tests... Merely pointing out ONE plausible scenario.Really and WHY would I recognize such a logo, or care enough to even look for it.
My exposure is almost exclusively limited to TESTING the stuff and MANDS has acquired close to 95%
of those samples assayed.
That's like suggesting I recognized the Argo starch sample bc I cook a lot
Puts a smile on my face to see this thread stay civil, informative and productive and not turn into a shit show. THIS is how i hoped this would go , @Dr JIM and @mands are going above and beyond and out of pocket, to help out the community that we are all a part of, so it sure is great to see this thread treated with the respect it deserves.
You're not the only one !
And i'm telling you its simply not the case, unless i want to spend even more time investigating "generic GH" on the net and anyone can do that, bc excluding ONE GREY I don't see the samples in REAL TIME!
Nuf said
legendary
Well-known Member
Thanks guys. I must say I regretfully bailed because I was scared to send. Ty Jim and Mands. This is good info. Also Jim I must say I google issues a friend was having and post you made helped out from 2014. Thanks for everything.
This is one of the FEW forums where any declaration of "thread ownership" (excluding Millard Baker) is simply bogus.
The number of Meso "sightseers, bench warmers, lurkers etc" is the reason it's so important to emphasize NO CONCLUSIONS should be drawn from a SINGLE SAMPLE assay.
To that end MANDS and I are doing this for Meso members and/or those who are wilingl spend the time required to READ THE ENTIRE THREAD.
Questions like; hey Jim why don't YOU include the "sample identity" along with it's PIC and graphic data from the outset, is a classic example of some lazy fool needing to be spoon fed!
If anyone can provide a REASON, as in MOTIVE why I would "doctor, adjust, or alter etc, these or ANY other results, post it! FISHY ? NOT!
jim
Last edited:
insertnamehere
New Member
You are most certainly mistaken as these results or have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with SIMEC or its methodologies!
Calculate GH "purity" based on what baseline values or measurements.
After the sample is hydrolysed an AAA first MEASURES the NUMBER of individual AA present in a sample, then using the known AA proportions in HUMAN GH, one can indirectly ESTIMATE purity.
Wiki has some fairly accurate discussions on the Amino Acid ASSAY
Last edited:
To ensure we are on the same page, define "GH purity"?
We/I don't need to be inundated with mounds of data on your blacks. What IS needed
-The HPLC graphic image
- The graphic standard used for comparison
- A brief narrative discussion much like what was included on the AAA I pated
- A "worksheet" page
IReview my FIRST SAMPLE POST for an example of all that may be required AND even less, in this case!
janoshik
Subscriber
I am not an expert in this field, but estimating a purity sounds a lot less precise than assaying / calculating it.
Also, generally the purity of HGH, from what I've heard is the amount of HGH / total amount of protein in the vial. This is important to some guys, because those other proteins can be immunogenic, or even straight up endotoxins.
Oh!
1) So what does "measured" mean then!
2) WRONG!
No offense but I suggest; you begin reading WIKI with respect to the different analytical assays and their application to rHGH before you register another opinion "on what you have "heard elsewhere".
Last edited:
janoshik
Subscriber
So are you saying that measuring the amount of amino acids is indeed a purity analysis?
What exactly is wrong about the second statement? I am checking the wiki and I can't really find much difference... Could you help me a bit over there, please? I'm sure other members of the community would appreciate it as well - I remember many arguments about what exactly a purity is.
