Geneza lab tests, Jan 2015

@devildog93 First off, thanks for the condescension fella, great way to interact with me for the first time.

Second, you don't think there are nimrods on this board? Are you kidding me? Have you seen this and the hundreds of others just like this?
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/first-cycle.134362214/

Third, so let me understand this, providing information backed up by science is not necessary here because you've got experience? That makes perfect sense. I'll shut my mouth now. Please PM Dr. Scally and Dr. Jim and inform them both that scientific information pertaining to physiology and physiologic differences is no longer needed here because you've got experience.

Now remember before you come back at me: I did not say the GP was legit, nor did I say it was bunk. But I think it's obvious to most experienced guys here that by two and a half weeks OP should have been feeling an increase in libido and some strength/reduced recovery times, at a minimum, so I think we all know where this is going. But you yourself said 5 weeks is when you hit your sweet spot and BoilerMech essentially said the same thing, so OP definitely has some more time to go before making a determination on the legitimacy of his GP, with blood work being the obvious determining factor.

Now, as for the study, One could infer that the study group, because of its increased time to peak testosterone effect, was given TRT dosages. This would account for the difference between your individual experience and what the research showed, right? In fact, if you had bothered to read the study you would have seen that test subjects were given between 350 and 700mg/ew in one study, 700-1050mg/ew, in a second study, and 1400mg/e2w in a third study. These studies were compiled over many years. Here is the exact section where they talked about dosages:

"In a study of 180 days of treatment with a 1% testosterone gel preparation (50 or 100 mg/day, contained in 5 or 10 g gel), mean muscle strength in the leg press exercise increased by 90 days and had not improved further at 180 days (14). A study similar in design found an increase in lean body mass and an improvement of lower limb muscle strength after 6 months (15). Another study using high doses of testosterone gel (starting dose 100 mg/day with possible up-titration to 150 mg/day) observed significant increases in leg press strength, chest press strength, and stair climbing power with a load within 6 months (16). A study administering testosterone enanthate, 200 mg/2 weeks observed major effects to occur over the first 12 months of testosterone administration, thereafter minor increases could be observed(17). It can be concluded that the effects of testosterone on muscle strength are demonstrable after 12–20 weeks and that depending on the achieved testosterone levels, the maximum effects are attained after 6 or 12 months. "

The amount of testosterone given to these test subjects are what I think we all would consider supra physiologic dosages since common TRT dosages are usually in the area of 100mg/ ew +/-. So what now devil dog?
You can disagree with the study all you want but making a judgement against the study and me based on your individual experience is wrong, and to call me out for simply providing information from a fact based study to help explain peak onset variances in a population speaks volumes about you.
~RO

RD
Of course we welcome the posting of evidence based literature on Meso.

However perhaps knowing a few of the differences between the article you posted and that of mates whom CYCLE AAS on a regular basis would enable others on Meso to better understand why you "become irritated" by those whom don't seem to "understand" the TT time/dose/response relationship.

I'll mention just a few factors that can certainly skew the data the researchers evaluate.

1) Because it's a retrospective literature review the results may be easily influenced by the citations included or excluded.

2) The mean patient age is not mentioned

3) Pretreatment TT levels are not disclosed

4) Post treatment TT levels or the average TT dose is not discussed

5) The method of TT administration is not included

These differences can (and do) have a HUGE influence on those physiologic factors many use to gauge the effectiveness (right or wrong) of the TT/AAS they are using.

However probably the most important contrast between TRT patients and cycling BB is the DOSE the latter use AND the propensity for lifters to stack multiple anabolic agents.

It's important to keep this in mind when reflecting upon the relevance and daily usefulness of the literature any of us may read.

(And I'm not suggesting your citation is irrelevant at all!)

Regs
Jim
 
RD
Of course we welcome the posting of evidence based literature on Meso.

However perhaps knowing a few of the differences between the article you posted and that of mates whom CYCLE AAS on a regular basis would enable others on Meso to better understand why you "become irritated" by those whom don't seem to "understand" the TT time/dose/response relationship.

I'll mention just a few factors that can certainly skew the data the researchers evaluate.

1) Because it's a retrospective literature review the results may be easily influenced by the citations included or excluded.

2) The mean patient age is not mentioned

3) Pretreatment TT levels are not disclosed

4) Post treatment TT levels or the average TT dose is not discussed

5) The method of TT administration is not included

These differences can (and do) have a HUGE influence on those physiologic factors many use to gauge the effectiveness (right or wrong) of the TT/AAS they are using.

However probably the most important contrast between TRT patients and cycling BB is the DOSE the latter use AND the propensity for lifters to stack multiple anabolic agents.

It's important to keep this in mind when reflecting upon the relevance and daily usefulness of the literature any of us may read.

Regs
Jim
I appreciate your thoughtful response and the time you took to write it. I don't pretend to be a doctor, I'm just a regular guy with a bit of education under my belt who gets a little offended when people say their individual experience trumps all. Without science we're just apes. And I appreciate you further explaining how this particular study lacked.

In response to point #5, I will just say that the study participants were given 5g and 10g gel's for the method of testosterone administration. Not injections.

Here's my question though to help me understand better, if person A is injecting test e at 500mg/ew and person B is rubbing on 500mg/Ew would there really be that much of a difference between onset of peak testosterone effect? I understand that absorption rates via gel is not as constant as an IM injection, but the difference between a members individual experience with a 6 week onset of peak T versus the 12 week onset of the study subjects is just too large to chalk up to physiologic differences between people.
 
I appreciate your thoughtful response and the time you took to write it. I don't pretend to be a doctor, I'm just a regular guy with a bit of education under my belt who gets a little offended when people say their individual experience trumps all. Without science we're just apes. And I appreciate you further explaining how this particular study lacked.

In response to point #5, I will just say that the study participants were given 5g and 10g gel's for the method of testosterone administration. Not injections.

Here's my question though to help me understand better, if person A is injecting test e at 500mg/ew and person B is rubbing on 500mg/Ew would there really be that much of a difference between onset of peak testosterone effect? I understand that absorption rates via gel is not as constant as an IM injection, but the difference between a members individual experience with a 6 week onset of peak T versus the 12 week onset of the study subjects is just too large to chalk up to physiologic differences between people.
I'm no scientist but the gel sucks ass for our purposes from my experience. I knew a Dr. that would give me as many sample packs of androgel as I wanted as he liked the kind bud I had. I used to administer 120mgs a day of that shit and I did get a big boost in libido but it was nothing like even 50 mg a day of prop. I didn't notice any significant gains in strength weight or anything even approaching what an injectable ester would do at that dose. I would say you can't even compare gel to injectable testosterone.
 
I'm no scientist but the gel sucks ass for our purposes from my experience. I knew a Dr. that would give me as many sample packs of androgel as I wanted as he liked the kind bud I had. I used to administer 120mgs a day of that shit and I did get a big boost in libido but it was nothing like even 50 mg a day of prop. I didn't notice any significant gains in strength weight or anything even approaching what an injectable ester would do at that dose. I would say you can't even compare gel to injectable testosterone.
I totally agree. The only thing I ever got from androgel was inconsistent blood values that were all over the map and a raging case of BPH. But does a gel application really take twice as long to reach maximum efficacy than compared to injectable? That's what I'd like to know, scientifically speaking of course;)
 
I totally agree. The only thing I ever got from androgel was inconsistent blood values that were all over the map and a raging case of BPH. But does a gel application really take twice as long to reach maximum efficacy than compared to injectable? That's what I'd like to know, scientifically speaking of course;)
That I couldn't say I know I took it for 6wks because this Dr was telling me it would work and kept trading me box's of the stuff for dank. After 6wks I gave up on that shit and cut my losses .
 
Well ask yourself the question, why do morning erections occur in the MORNING!

Ah bc that's when there is a near doubling to tripling or one's TT level!

Thus considering the marked rise in TT levels that is achieved using parenteral AAS as compared to topical agents, I'm not at all surprised significant physiologic differences are noted when reviewing the literature
 
Before TRT I was at 58 ng/dl. Within days of the first injection (which would have only bumped me to low normal at best), I was able to get it up properly for the first time in months. Within a month, my sex drive was back to 80%+. About 6 weeks later, my body composition started changing radically.

And that's on TRT, not supraphysiological dosing.

I've never cycled, so I don't have a point of comparison, but I thought I'd throw in my .02. At least for me, increasing my TT levels 6 fold yielded RAPID results in terms of sex drive.
 
No doubt you qualify for TRT, and with levels that low I'm not at all surprised your improvement occurred as rapidly as it did.

I've also no doubt your experience emphasizes just a few of the physiological "response" differences between TRT patients and BB cycling AAS.

The devil is in the DETAILS.
jim
 
Take this for what's it's worth... I've read here for about a year just doing my research on labs. Etc.

I am a competitor at the professional level. Not trying to brag and not here to toot my horn but I'm going to give you my experience with Naps and geneza.

As a competitor at a high level, you don't use stuff you're unsure about - that's detrimental to a prep.

I've used naps for 5 years and for every single off season cycle and every single contest prep. In about 50 orders. Yes, 50. I have only had ONE small issue. I had some dragon pharma npp that I wasn't so sure about but I didn't bother to do labs because I know naps doesn't let junk go out.

The rest of the stuff I've ever is always geneza. I know geneza has got a bad rep from people. You know what those people have bad things to say??? It's because they don't know what the drugs are supposed to do. If you're diet and training isn't on point you are pissing down your leg. You could run 1 gram of test and anadrol and still look like sh** and not get stronger if you don't know your diet or what the compound is doing to your body.

My old roommate split a order with me about 5 years ago. We used the exact same cycle. He swears his stuff was fake or under dosed. Funny because I saw changes in an unbelievable way.

I know you all think just because it's a UGL it's under dosed. That's not true at all. I don't care what you may say. Am I fighting for all UGLS? HELL NO. I had to get some stuff quick one time and ordered domestic and I know the sht was under dosed. I know my body I know my diet and I know my training. I know how my body reacts to EVERY SINGLE DRUG.

Honestly I have no reason to get on here and lie for anyone but I do get sick of people trying to blame naps for bad gear. If anything the gear is overdosed! You can bash me all you want because I have 1 post and not take this comment and reputable but I can tell you that the gear is good to go. I will always use and trust naps. Always.
 
Last edited:
Take this for what's it's worth... I've read here for about a year just doing my research on labs. Etc.

I am a competitor at the professional level. Not trying to brag and not here to toot my horn but I'm going to give you my experience with Naps and geneza.

As a competitor at a high level, you don't use stuff you're unsure about - that's detrimental to a prep.

I've used naps for 5 years and for every single off season cycle and every single contest prep. In about 50 orders. Yes, 50. I have only had ONE small issue. I had some dragon pharma npp that I wasn't so sure about but I didn't bother to do labs because I know naps doesn't let junk go out.

The rest of the stuff I've ever is always geneza. I know geneza has got a bad rep from people. You know what those people have bad things to say??? It's because they don't know what the drugs are supposed to do. If you're diet and training isn't on point you are pissing down your leg. You could run 1 gram of test and anadrol and still look like sh** and not get stronger if you don't know your diet or what the compound is doing to your body.

My old roommate split a order with me about 5 years ago. We used the exact same cycle. He swears his stuff was fake or under dosed. Funny because I saw changes in an unbelievable way.

I know you all think just because it's a UGL it's under dosed. That's not true at all. I don't care what you may say. Am I fighting for all UGLS? HELL NO. I had to get some stuff quick one time and ordered domestic and I know the sht was under dosed. I know my body I know my diet and I know my training. I know how my body reacts to EVERY SINGLE DRUG.

Honestly I have no reason to get on here and lie for anyone but I do get sick of people trying to blame naps for bad gear. If anything the gear is overdosed! You can bash me all you want because I have 1 post and not take this comment and reputable but I can tell you that the gear is good to go. I will always use and trust naps. Always.


Untitled.jpg



Since I just exposed the real reason for your transparent shill job, does this mean you won't get your 20% discount? LMFAO

Go fellate Naps on ProMuscle or OLM, numbnuts. Those clowns eat that shit up.
 
Last edited:
In about 50 orders. Yes, 50. I have only had ONE small issue. I had some dragon pharma npp that I wasn't so sure about but I didn't bother to do labs because I know naps doesn't let junk go out.

Honestly I have no reason to get on here and lie for anyone but I do get sick of people trying to blame naps for bad gear. If anything the gear is overdosed! You can bash me all you want because I have 1 post and not take this comment and reputable but I can tell you that the gear is good to go. I will always use and trust naps. Always.



6689543620c11f15fa61451d4bc83c98817e7384427db1f0889558c0f80a4efa.jpg
 
Last edited:
I could care less about a discount homies. I could have wrote one sentence and got a discount if I wanted. I'm just giving my experience and of course you clowns don't want to take it.

I really would hate to live a life like you. Constantly waiting to post memes on an Internet forum. Would love to see your physique since you are the king of talking sh** you must look like Arnold. Get back to me on that :)
 
Perhaps Sir Athlete is naive or just foolish but for many of us this is NOT the first damn rodeo especially when it comes to evaluating UGLs.

How do you KNOW the Naps gear your using is "overdosed" (lol). Must be that "body" thing again.

What you believe all the complaints about Naps, their Geneza line in particular, are mates that "don't know their body"?

If your getting all "good stuff" it's bc you have a direct line to Naps as a result of your competitive exposure, thus Naps is fully aware of Sir Athlete and makes adjustments when YOU ORDER.

However if you believe everyone else is so fortunate your living in the land of OZ fella!
 
It boils down to dipshits not knowing what to use, how to use it, how to diet, how to train... But hey - what do I know. I'm not a doctor like you.

I do know this. I don't know anyone from naps. I don't use discounts. I don't know why you're so hurt over a source that has been reputable and honest for 10 years but I do know this. Everything I've used has been on point. But that's a small piece to the puzzle. Most of you guys that have been to all these rodeos you speak must have some BA pharma sources. LOL.

Kinda reminds me when I was reading on here a few months ago and a huge domestic source you all talk so highly of ran off with all of your money but you all still think they were busted...
 
Last edited:
Oh, in terms of enlightenment I'm in awe that you would grace us with your presence and commentary.

However if you believe even some on Meso will simply follow your condescending lead wo any supportive evidence it's best you give Eroids a try, lol!

Oh and I don't know what UGL your referring to BUT your obviously FOS (and full of yourself) bc we don't "ALL" agree on anything, let alone the destiny of some unnamed UGL.
 
Last edited:
Oh, in terms of enlightenment I'm in awe that you would grace us with your presence and commentary.
Man I'm in awe too. I've never had a keyboard match with a doctor. I'm going to have to get ahold of some of your pharma grade stuff man...
 
Oh, in terms of enlightenment I'm in awe that you would grace us with your presence and commentary.

However if you believe even some on Meso will simply follow your condescending lead wo any supportive evidence it's best you give Eroids a try, lol!

Oh and I don't know what UGL your referring to BUT your obviously FOS (and full of yourself) bc we don't "ALL" agree on anything, let alone the destiny of some unnamed UGL.
Or I could post here. Give my experience with the product and people can take it how they want. Just like I said. And just like the rest of you fuck boys do too. I guess I could buy a labmax kit and see the amazing glow caused by whatever it's cut with and say piggies it's legit. Lol.

I'm done with you. If you can't take the experience of someone else posting and live in a bubble then I can't even take you serious. Be back later gotta go fill more vials for NAPS. LMAO
 
Man I'm in awe too. I've never had a keyboard match with a doctor. I'm going to have to get ahold of some of your pharma grade stuff man...

Shit SirAthlete why waste your time with "Pharms" don't you know your body, Naps is "overdosed" and better, lol!
 
Or I could post here. Give my experience with the product and people can take it how they want. Just like I said. And just like the rest of you fuck boys do too. I guess I could buy a labmax kit and see the amazing glow caused by whatever it's cut with and say piggies it's legit. Lol.

I'm done with you. If you can't take the experience of someone else posting and live in a bubble then I can't even take you serious. Be back later gotta go fill more vials for NAPS. LMAO

Shit damn CBS spoiling it :)

Hmm but SirAthlete do come back now, why I was just getting started mate!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top