FFS. Publicly expose member usernames who do bad shit. Is that easier to understand? How is that for recourse?!I haven't seen any recourse
It's not incompatible with the prohibition against posting personally identifiable information.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
FFS. Publicly expose member usernames who do bad shit. Is that easier to understand? How is that for recourse?!I haven't seen any recourse
Have you been following this thread? @GiantZeus.com said he would post member usernames upon request from you. The only member exposed so far is @Flounder. @GiantZeus.com said there were others. They need to be exposed. I feel it's fucking pointless but it's a start. If there is no recourse it shows that it is ok to do this shitFFS. Publicly expose member usernames who do bad shit. Is that easier to understand? How is that for recourse?!
It's not incompatible with the prohibition against posting personally identifiable information.
Lmao. He's not dick riding or trolling so he gets a passYour a pussy if you don't refer MB to your fan club thread fish. LMAO
The recourse is public exposure and accountability. How is that not recourse? What is there to explain?If there is no recourse it shows that it is ok to do this shit
I agree public exposure is recourse. Are the other parties involved going to be exposed?The recourse is public exposure and accountability. How is that not recourse? What is there to explain?
...If someone with evidence wants to expose them.I agree public exposure is recourse. Are the other parties involved going to be exposed?
@GiantZeus.com now is your chance to come clean with all parties. He stated that upon request from an administrator he would give usernames of other parties involved...If someone with evidence wants to expose them.
He's most likely here with another username or he could be one of the trolls plaguing meso. I meant that an ip ban is a better solution although that will still not deter some
In december I was in the horsepital. I fucked my neck up and needed surgery. @CdnGuy were talking on the phone and texting and we both noticed as soon as giant Zeus came on the scene, mkultra hit him up. After one post mmultra immediately took the convo to PM. CDN and I both noticed it. We both were injured and had time on our hands. We decided to expose mkultra. Next day he posted in another ugl section he received his gear but it's for his "friends"
@GiantZeus.com now is your chance to come clean with all parties. He stated that upon request from an administrator he would give usernames of other parties involved
Know nothing about this...The only excuse should me the lack of evidence to support wrongdoing or the lack of any real wrongdoing in the first place.
Have you been following this thread? @GiantZeus.com said he would post member usernames upon request from you. The only member exposed so far is @Flounder. @GiantZeus.com said there were others. They need to be exposed. I feel it's fucking pointless but it's a start. If there is no recourse it shows that it is ok to do this shit
From GiantZeus' perspective, what's the cost/benefit of him exposing more names? There's the cost of more pissed off (exposed users) writing false/negative reviews of his products on other forums, hurting his sales. And is this countered by any benefit of Meso members purchasing more of his products? Looks doubtful so far from the posts here, he's relatively new and most people here aren't ordering yet....but are demanding him to "come clean" by giving up more names which will undoubtedly hurt his business.
It's totally his decision and unless you and others are willing to replace his otherwise lost sales I don't think it's fair to keep demanding that he release more names. He did one to show that a problem exists and to make an example so others don't harass him similarly.
If he exposes them, then they won't have much credibility if they tried to complain or leave ad review.... And if Millard bans them, well then I suppose that person would or could create a fake handle and complain, but then again, that complaint would probably have all eyes on it to see if it was in fact one of the people who were kicked for strong arming.
Believe it or not him exposing these members has made me consider using him. It shows he has balls and won't take shit. I was looking at his products and his pharm grade hgh is a good price. I was waiting to see the outcome before I asked him or any others about his productsFrom GiantZeus' perspective, what's the cost/benefit of him exposing more names? There's the cost of more pissed off (exposed users) writing false/negative reviews of his products on other forums, hurting his sales. And is this countered by any benefit of Meso members purchasing more of his products? Looks doubtful so far from the posts here, he's relatively new and most people here aren't ordering yet....but are demanding him to "come clean" by giving up more names which will undoubtedly hurt his business.
It's totally his decision and unless you and others are willing to replace his otherwise lost sales I don't think it's fair to keep demanding that he release more names. He did one to show that a problem exists and to make an example so others don't harass him similarly.
Believe it or not him exposing these members has made me consider using him. It shows he has balls and won't take shit. I was looking at his products and his pharm grade hgh is a good price. I was waiting to see the outcome before I asked him or any others about his products
Actually, asking for the names of red handed , reverse scammers, is not the same as falsely gang banging sources to extort gear. Definitely not Apples to Apples.If the benefit outweighs the cost from the source's perspective then I'm sure he'll release more names.
In the end whatever decision he has made or makes should be respected IMO, or if not it's just another example of users trying to strong arm him.