Marcus
New Member
That's crazy good prices. Mind sharing the source or they private?It'll be great to see what happens when you start serostim.
Found pharma for $60. (5mg)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's crazy good prices. Mind sharing the source or they private?It'll be great to see what happens when you start serostim.
Found pharma for $60. (5mg)
Completely agree dr Jim. Serostim is next up after I finish some of these black topsMarcus YOUR generic GH comparisons would be much more meaningful if you had a legitimate PHARMA for comparison.
And that's important bc hepatic IGF production can vary considerably from one individual to the next.
Of course another HUGE problem is the batch to batch quantitative variability of GGH
It'll be great to see what happens when you start serostim.
Found pharma for $60. (5mg)
That's a shame mate.The greys tested at 7 and 8 units and I also said those were underdosed. I then ALSO scored nearly 700 on 8 units of black tops sour theory is debunked buddy.
Literally shows that I wasn't even banging 8 units at half a vial per day of GT.
I don't doubt that some of it is good. The issue and my issue all along was consistency... as is demonstrated hereThat's a shame mate.
Just as I was starting to think maybe Godt were GTG, after being super sceptical all this time - now this.
That would be amazing if you did assays again. Thank you for always contributing so much to this site!Marcus YOUR generic GH comparisons would be much more meaningful if you had a legitimate PHARMA for comparison.
And that's important bc hepatic IGF production can vary considerably from one individual to the next.
Of course another HUGE problem is the batch to batch quantitative variability of GGH
I mean the fact GTs are labeled as 24IUs but are considerably short of that mark when formally analysed, has many folk wonder how many IUs they
are running.
Sounds like it may be time to run some more GGH assays, what you think @mands ?
This time @mands and I will include a few MALDIs so you folk can better understand that particular assays limitations and/or utility.
Marcus YOUR generic GH comparisons would be much more meaningful if you had a legitimate PHARMA for comparison.
And that's important bc hepatic IGF production can vary considerably from one individual to the next.
Of course another HUGE problem is the batch to batch quantitative variability of GGH
I mean the fact GTs are labeled as 24IUs but are considerably short of that mark when formally analysed, has many folk wonder how many IUs they
are running.
Sounds like it may be time to run some more GGH assays, what you think @mands ?
This time @mands and I will include a few MALDIs so you folk can better understand that particular assays limitations and/or utility.
Yea some of it is good - but the question is - is that good enough?I don't doubt that some of it is good. The issue and my issue all along was consistency... as is demonstrated here
Lol, here we go again...LOL, MALDI can literally SEQUENCE the peptide if you so desire and are willing to pay.
Two weeks ago you were saying MALDI was oranges and AAA was apples....
Now you're an expert whose going to explain to the rest of us it's application.
Oh I'm not using seros, I'll be using xenedrip.Seros are the number one counterfeited pharma product on the market today.
@Marcus if you can stick with a U.S. Pharma product.
However if Seros are your only option
INSIST upon documentation that PROVES its Pharma AND I'll get it tested for you fella.
I'll tell you EVERY Sero obtained thru the net that I've tested was a FAKE, with a QQ that was no better than GTs.
And I'll also let you guys know why your paying considerably more for Sero's ----- the counterfeiting is some of the best I've ever seen, from the "box" to the ID and lot numbers.
Lol, here we go again...
1) MALDI can literally SEQUENCE the peptide if you so desire and are willing to pay.
2) Two weeks ago you were saying MALDI was oranges and AAA was apples....
Now you're an expert whose going to explain to the rest of us it's application.
1) MALDI is ultra sensitive and can actually sequence the protein, not just give a relative ratio like AAA.
2) The only thing it cannot do is actually show the 3D structure. It is the most accurate system out there today
.
1) WRONG again! Good God you clearly don't know WTF your talking about, MALDI per se can't "sequence" SQUAT.
But "Do Nut" do tell what assay is
primarily used to determine GH sequencing?
3) The primary purpose of MALDI is to determine the MOLECULAR WEIGHT of a samples constituent
compounds.
2) WRONG Amino Acid Analysis and MALDI have different applications DO-NUT. And if used by those who know WTF they are doing the results can be complimentary or confirmatory
So what you were hired as some lab rat and now can be relied upon to provide reliable info, most of Mesos members know better.
So what you selling Clown!
No sir. I said YOU said AAA could. It's there in black and white. Everyone can go look.1) ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT post any evidence MALDI can provide GH sequencing info!
2) What changing your tune so soon DO NOT bc you clearly implied, unlike an AAA, MALDI could provide info on a compounds "tertiary" structure!
More BULLSHIT!
Lol, Like it!No sir. I said YOU said AAA could. It's there in black and white. Everyone can go look.
I have never seen a person like you insist they are right when they are proven wrong.
You're the fucking KellyAnn Conway of steroids
No sir. I said YOU said AAA could. It's there in black and white. Everyone can go look.
I have never seen a person like you insist they are right when they are proven wrong.
You're the fucking KellyAnn Conway of steroids
I think @mands is smarter than to make fool out of himself by listening to you and your 'scientific knowledge' again.