Yeah, I know this is really old. But I needed a break and have spent some time reading the forum this week. I've only just run across some of MG's stuff and this is kind of directed at him, though will help all I'm sure.
MG - You are someone who's seen many sides of the game in that you've not only competed athletically and per the anabolic advice of medical staff, but now you are older and have seen the bro-science application of it as well. Granted your goals are different these days, but that doesn't change the point I'm trying to make.
You seem to have the rare combination of experience that allows you to speak from both sides that I mention above. Before I go on and on, I simply want to know if your experience has changed any of the advice you would give to aspiring athletes who decide to go the anabolic route. Let me give you some examples and you'll understand why I ask.
EQ - Many will say it's overrated for athletes and the same can be accomplished with Test (regarding endurance). I know you recommend it, but others whom I too respect in the field of performance, would argue that there are better ways (EPO for example)
Tren - Athlete killer or just dose dependent? I've seen you post about your cardio going to shit since adding Tren.
Winny - Still hold that it's a must for the explosive athlete? I also found a post you made stating that it's not for everyone. If I had to guess, I'd say that some 80% of users say it's an injury waiting to happen.
I'm not trying to say what's right or wrong. I just for some reason am drawn to your perspective on things due to your experiences in life. Thus, I'd like to know if there's anything you'd change in your advice now that the years of experience you have, match your age when the gridiron was home.
Thanks for your time.
