janoshik
Subscriber
Even continuous. Am I wrong?Okay I'll bite on this one.
Are you saying (1) shot or continuous use of testosterone at 100%?
mands
What is equivalent of normal production per week? 50mg?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even continuous. Am I wrong?Okay I'll bite on this one.
Are you saying (1) shot or continuous use of testosterone at 100%?
mands
Here you go...And have you not used IGF-1 as one of your main arguments in this discussion?
Okay, so, how in the hell is that soliciting?
It is stating a fact as an answer to a direct question.
What would you be happy if I told the guy? That I'm a ballet dancer?
What the hell is wrong with you?
Yes I believe you are incorrect! Do you have any info stating differntly?Even continuous. Am I wrong?
What is equivalent of normal production per week? 50mg?
Why can't you just post your buddy's bloodwork?Legal reasons. I am far from anonymous and submitting anything that would imply existence of proof I use performance enhancing drugs is simply not smart.
He didn't let me yet.Why can't you just post your buddy's bloodwork?
So your igf-1 levels on 2 iu's pharm grade seem pretty close to what mine are. Were you taking anything else besides Tren while on them?
They were black tops from PD or TP?
I think most are reconstituting blacks at 10 iu's that are getting those numbers. And some just respond better than others.
What was your baseline?
mands
@mands Yet another excellent point!
All online resources refer to 75 - 80 points IGF-1 increase from 1IU pharma (no one did studies on Chinese non-pharma, lol).
What was your baseline?I had my IGF -1 level at 362 and this was on 2 iu of pharm grade per day.... I felt pretty good-- would it be a decent level to try to maintain? Switching to black tops I am thinking I would need to run at least 3 iu per day....
Maybe I respond well?? I am thinking 4iu plus may be overkill---- I am just about 47 and on trt for life so I have no problem staying on hgh for life as well.
baseline was 142What was your baseline?
I would actually see what black top # you have and find out mg and reconstitute accordingly. I would run the same amount at 2 iu's.I had my IGF -1 level at 362 and this was on 2 iu of pharm grade per day.... I felt pretty good-- would it be a decent level to try to maintain? Switching to black tops I am thinking I would need to run at least 3 iu per day....
Maybe I respond well?? I am thinking 4iu plus may be overkill---- I am just about 47 and on trt for life so I have no problem staying on hgh for life as well.
I decided to do a igf1 test a while back and it came back in the normal range at 4iu per day. I figured it was the batch and tried two more tests with two more kits with a different batch number and still within normal range. I thought it was the Chinese generic so I got seros directly from a person prescribed and did 2 iu per day for a month and still same igf1 number. The UG source told me its because I have been on so long and to take a break. Does long term use effect igf1 levels? can you have elevated serum tests and still not get high igf1 numbers? never had it tested in beginning and was probably a year in straight when I took my first igf1 test. all bloodwork and liver normal. only health problems were pancreas during some tren cycles.
I was on it for 4 months--- I have now started batch 31 from pd.I would actually see what black top # you have and find out mg and reconstitute accordingly. I would run the same amount at 2 iu's.
How long were you on pharm grade when you tested?
mands
Nice abstract.Here you go...
Exogenous 20K growth hormone (GH) suppresses endogenous 22K GH secretion in normal men.
Hashimoto Y1, Kamioka T, Hosaka M, Mabuchi K, Mizuchi A, Shimazaki Y, Tsunoo M, Tanaka T.
Author information
Abstract
...
If you read further down the thread I referenced you can clearly see a member asking for your services after you posted that. It's pretty clear.
mands
The purpose of my post was to your reply that the original study was 192 aa. I said they both had the same effect on endogenous GH secretion and that levels were suppressed to almost nothing. I then posted another study showing you this. You even posted above. I bolded it for you.Seems like I'm not getting an answer from @mands so I'm just thinking I'll paste this here:
"Although the mean serum 22K-GH levels after injection were not different even at higher doses compared to the placebo group during the first 4 h, the 22K-hGH levels were reduced even at lower doses from approximately 4–6 h up to 12 h. During the subsequent 24-h observation period, the 22K-hGH levels gradually returned to the placebo level."
"Both the AUC12–18 h and AUC18–24 h tended to be suppressed in the 20K-hGH-treated groups, although differences were not significant compared with the placebo group."
Have a nice day mands and read the studies you copy paste, just to make sure they do not help a stance which you are trying to make a point against.
Thank you for letting me know that now. Not like asked twice before.The purpose of my post was to your reply that the original study was 192 aa. I said they both had the same effect on endogenous GH secretion and that levels were suppressed to almost nothing.
...levels were suppressed to almost nothing.
I then posted another study showing you this. You even posted above. I bolded it for you.
Therefore your statement was inaccurate saying your normal pulses would not be interrupted at night if you took your gh in the morning. You were wrong.
Good day.
mands
So am I, yet again, held to a impossible standard that nobody else but me has to keep up to? Or is it only you who got the shit talking permit?
Where exactly did I state I falsified results?
Reading comprehension 101.
And have you not used IGF-1 as one of your main arguments in this discussion?
Okay, so, how in the hell is that soliciting?
It is stating a fact as an answer to a direct question.
What would you be happy if I told the guy? That I'm a ballet dancer?
What the hell is wrong with you?
If that's the game you want to play (you know, holding me up to a standard that you hold nobody else to), I have nothing more to discuss with you mands and in case you are interested, I'll gladly let you have a peek on what soliciting looks like.
kkthxbbLol oh man just skimmed through that whole saga. Soliciting or not, you present yourself on here as a professional, but scamming a member here, for what a couple hundred bucks tops, shows that either your financial situation is beyond dire, or that there is no such lab to begin with. Either way, total Amateur hour and an absolute disgrace. You got a lot of sack to still be here I'll give you that lol. And caught red-handed and still be talking shit to mands. Truly unbelievable.
I am glad I found this thread. I was considering your services. It seemed funny how you could offer these tests at 1/4 the cost every other lab charges.kkthxbb
Lack of reading comprehension 101 in play again, but I am too tired this early in the morning and honestly, I don't even care anymore. If somebody can't read, it's not my problem.