First off, there's no need to get hostile—I’ve referenced studies and backed up my points, not just thrown around opinions. I never claimed MK-677 is superior to GH, just that it’s a viable option for some, particularly when used alongside GH, which I’ve personally done with great results. The studies I mentioned were relevant, and though they often focus on older or deficient populations, they show clear efficacy in raising GH/IGF-1 levels, which is what I was addressing.
You’re also missing the point on the steady GH levels MK-677 provides—it’s about optimizing recovery and sleep, not creating massive IGF-1 spikes alone. Managing insulin resistance is easy with proper strategies (e.g., metformin, GLP-1 agonists), so that doesn’t invalidate the benefits of MK-677. I never claimed it’s the ultimate choice for everyone, just that it can work well in specific contexts when combined with insulin, and AAS.
Lastly, I don’t need to convince anyone—I share what works based on experience and research. If you’re satisfied with your approach, that’s great, but don't dismiss MK-677 just because it doesn’t suit your preference. People use different protocols for different reasons, and there’s no one-size-fits-all.