Higher dosage of GH EOD over lower dose ED for size ?

leanmachine6

New Member
pretty much what it says in the title? higher HGH EOD vs lower dose ED, training split may be EOD so perhaps pinning on training days at a higher dose would be more beneficial for building size ? will also be using slin on training days only too. for example:
7am 3iu gh
7am 6iu slin
TRAIN
2pm 3iu gh
2pm 6iu slin
just havent decided on my split yet, if i go for 1 day on 1 day off that looking like a better protocol right ? with the PWO slin & GH shot i may not be taken for up to 60 minutes after training as i cant risk carrying them with me will have to wait until im home.
 
Such issues matter little IF your running Pharmaceutical GH, if NOT, well chances are what you have is either a significantly diluted GH product or one in which the Amino Acid proportions and/or sequencing are inconsistent with effective HGH.

In the latter instance the required GH/IGF dose/response
curve is unlikely to develop.

Just stick with AAS if you can't afford legit GH!
 
FYI
The "risk" (exclusive of thievery) of carrying GH is MINIMAL bc it is NOT a scheduled substance!

Oh and I'd keep your mouth shut about advertising your intent to cycle GH with "friends" at the gym, bc they may
find the temptation to borrow a couple vials an overwhelming proposition, lol.
 
Such issues matter little IF your running Pharmaceutical GH, if NOT, well chances are what you have is either a significantly diluted GH product or one in which the Amino Acid proportions and/or sequencing are inconsistent with effective HGH.

In the latter instance the required GH/IGF dose/response
curve is unlikely to develop.

Just stick with AAS if you can't afford legit GH!
Jim: I generally agree with you and I also agree there is a lot of bad generic gh out there.

I too believe improperly folded / constructed amino chains can illicit a gh serum result that seems good but have no real effect on IGF levels. I was always skeptical of generic gh.

That said, advances if cost of production over the past 5-6 years seem to have improved what's out there. There are certainly some Chinese producers making gh that results in a good gh serum level and, more importantly, also IGF results. So how do we explain that? We know most producers overfill to get better gh serum scores. But if this "lock and key" effect wasn't happening in the receptors at liver level, how would IGF be elevated? 1.5 per iu vs 5-7 per iu is tempting when you're getting similar elevations in IGF.

Your thoughts? I do believe there is legitimate generic gh with decent purity out there. Do you not after all that you have seen and with the amount of lab reports out there?
 
Back
Top