yes i did,hehehe, my apologies for that dude. Thanks for your opinion about HR
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
HugeRaw
- Thread starter ChaseTheYoke
- Start date
pined Eod tren a 100 and test cyp 250
Savagesteve
Well-known Member
You taking only 250mg of cyp per week? Also, is your e2 sky high or is it reading high because of the tren?
I believe it's Tren related . Next time I will be doing a e2 sensitive test. And pin 875mg a week of cyp
Savagesteve
Well-known Member
Isn't the total test pretty low for pinning that much test?
That's only half the story
Consider the amount of pinnig seems that way
Drewcifer
Member
TT seems very very low for 850mg a week
@hugraw Waiting on response from supplier. Hope they will take care of this some how
Drewcifer
Member
Have you ever run ugl products and if so what were your test results?
@Drewcifer I have had ugls. But never tested only hugeraw . Are you suggesting how fast my body metabolizes it.
Is your TT low for the amount your running perhaps but that really depends upon several factors and the fact your TT revealed a level > 1500 ng/dl SUGGESTS the assays were conducted by LC/MS and that's as sensitive as it gets.
My suggestion would be to call LM and ask them which assay was used for both the TT and E-2,
FYI
There's A LOT of confusion about E-2 testing on forums but suffice it to say when a lab
states their assay is "E-2 sensitive" they are generally referring to it's accuracy at LOW E-2 values.
This is done bc of the importance of E-2 in those patients with breast CA, many being treated with AI's. To that end understand EVERY test has certain limits of detection for any substance.
The other issue is one of cross-reactivity with NOT Tren bc that effect is MINOR compared to that which can occur from E-1 or E-3, a difference of one O-H (hydroxyl group).
Nonetheless all of these issues can be overcome with ensuring the test ordered is a LC/MS at least
Last edited:
....... initially as pre-cycle labs. But intra-cycle labs are often much to do about nothing for the majority of non-competitive BB who are ASYMPTOMATIC, IME!
There are several other reasons for this but .......... that's for another thread.
There are several other reasons for this but .......... that's for another thread.
Last edited:
If the etiology of a drug related sign or symptom has yet to be established, all that which follows are inferences based on anecdotal associations. The latter is the foundation of bro-science and once propagated and/or parroted as truth from one forum to the next, tends to morph into bro-lore.
Hormone Panel with F&T Testosterone LC/MS-MS this was the test done
That's as accurate as it gets mate!
Ok, see bc there is only a 30 Dalton difference bt E-2 and TT they WLL test and can detect E-2 and TT at the same time, using the same MS settings, reagents and run time, etc.
So what does that mean to you? It means both the E-2 and TT were most assuredly assayed using the same LC/MS methodology, and once again that's as "sensitive" as it gets
Oh and Tren, or ANY other AAS, "falls out" like a ROCK and becomes a moot issue using such technology
Last edited:
@Dr JIM thanks Dr JIM . Just trying to follow what your saying so my e2 is not off by much . I'm taking raloxifene and waiting on adex from the pharmacist. One more question so if pinning test cyp 250 eod TT levels low?
Are you treating an E-2 NUMBER in the absence of presumed signs and/or symptoms?
E-2 fluctuations are considerable and for that reason I'm just reluctant to treat E-2 in the absence of S&S
In cases like yours I want to know what the E-2 TROUGH level is, and that's readily obtained by a blood draw immediately before a scheduled injection
E-2 fluctuations are considerable and for that reason I'm just reluctant to treat E-2 in the absence of S&S
In cases like yours I want to know what the E-2 TROUGH level is, and that's readily obtained by a blood draw immediately before a scheduled injection
@Dr JIM have puffy nips and lumps and feel a little loss in libido and not the numbers
Puffy nips are NOT E-2 specific and define "lumps", size and location in particluar and finally such S&S are best treated with a SERM such as Novladex rather than Ralox. The data On Tamo far exceeds Ralox and from that perspective there is NO COMPARISON
How long have you been using Ralo and at what dose?
I'm not say considering the above you may not benefit form SERMs or AI's but I like to KNOW what I'm treating and have a well defined therapeutic objective.
How long have you been using Ralo and at what dose?
I'm not say considering the above you may not benefit form SERMs or AI's but I like to KNOW what I'm treating and have a well defined therapeutic objective.
Last edited:
