If You Buy From Napsgear You’re a Legit Retarded

I think Millard is confusing the PPL doxxing with Naps. Naps has VIP status and has never been banned, but maybe I missed it? I love the chaos here, so I don't think I did.
Ppl didnt doxx anyone, if you re referring to that story about that idiot that claimed a hacker swapped the btc address.. ppl just showed to some guys the truth… and the truth is that in some years just that idiot claimed “a hacker” hacked ppls’ site to steal 900$ one time in 4 years
 
Ppl didnt doxx anyone, if you re referring to that story about that idiot that claimed a hacker swapped the btc address.. ppl just showed to some guys the truth… and the truth is that in some years just that idiot claimed “a hacker” hacked ppls’ site to steal 900$ one time in 4 years
ppl's rep sent a customer's information to numerous members here. Where it went from there, we have no way of knowing.

What a shit way to handle a complaint, huh?
 
Serious question: is it OK to repeatedly post fake reviews with fake photos as long as the reviews and photos change?

You can assume everything is fake. That is fine. And everyone has always been free to express their opinions on the matter.

I prefer to have evidence whether the reviews are real or manufactured or other issues such as whether it involves the use of an automated script or bots.

At any rate, I'm not the arbitrator on who is telling the truth. Members should make their case, ideally with evidence, to hold sources accountable.

If you can prove this action will be taken. Just adding the adverb obviously doesn't count as definitive proof.

I really dont see an answer to the question
 
Ppl didnt doxx anyone, if you re referring to that story about that idiot that claimed a hacker swapped the btc address.. ppl just showed to some guys the truth… and the truth is that in some years just that idiot claimed “a hacker” hacked ppls’ site to steal 900$ one time in 4 years
And blackmails emails with send me btc or I send info to DEA didn't existed. It was only one episod of schizophrenia of mine
 
If I have time tomorrow I will try. I already have 20+ screenshots just from the first 10 pages of identical granite and countertops.

I will not create that, but I was partially saying it to explain in a way that it is not very hard to do and to pull from a large bank of words that would only take about a couple days work to type out all the review parts that they have. I mean the subject line “Touchdown” is used like atleast 20+ times. And the “got my pack in 3 weeks” is used a lot. It would be really easy to insert a random number generator that picks between 2-4 for all the TA comments to make it seem more random. There is just a lot of tell tale signs that someone is using a script to create this and when they upload they add the pictures of the vials from around their houses. I mean recently they’ve been resulting to posting in the bubble wrap only because I think they realized it was getting a little bit obvious.
Thanks for doing what the forum moderators should be. I'm not smart enough with computer stuff to even know what youre talking about.
 
And blackmails emails with send me btc or I send info to DEA didn't existed. It was only one episod of schizophrenia of mine

they said a guy betrayed them, shit happens… dont buy from them for that if you feel better …
I could say they have always been fair with me…

and if you think i m sucking their cock you re wrong.. i never asked them any discounts… since i dont give a fuck about some hundreds.. I sent a detailed recipe for an italian dish one time and Ollie told me Oh i ll give you a bigger discount… i dont give a fuck , 1 million or nothing
 
ppl's rep sent a customer's information to numerous members here. Where it went from there, we have no way of knowing.

What a shit way to handle a complaint, huh?
It wasnt a complaint… the guy opened a theead called SCAMMED OUT OF 900$ from Purple Panda Labs !!1!’n (Something like that)

i would have done way way worse.. they just showed the truth by screening their site , and they didn’t do it on the open forum… just sent the video to a bunch of guys they trusted
 
It wasnt a complaint… the guy opened a theead called SCAMMED OUT OF 900$ from Purple Panda Labs !!1!’n (Something like that)

i would have done way way worse.. they just showed the truth by screening their site , and they didn’t do it on the open forum… just sent the video to a bunch of guys they trusted
Sorry man, I can not get behind what they did. It was wrong. I would be livid if my information went out to random people without my consent.

But this is about naps. Fuck @naps.
 
they said a guy betrayed them, shit happens… dont buy from them for that if you feel better …
I could say they have always been fair with me…

and if you think i m sucking their cock you re wrong.. i never asked them any discounts… since i dont give a fuck about some hundreds.. I sent a detailed recipe for an italian dish one time and Ollie told me Oh i ll give you a bigger discount… i dont give a fuck , 1 million or nothing
You can make the same parallel with naps. Not their boss was written that he send package to put people in jail but it was his child that got on the phone and try to do a prank. Shit happens
Don't buy from naps if you feel better and evreyone shoud do the same and let the guy be around. Is ok this logic?
 
You can make the same parallel with naps. Not their boss was written that he send package to put people in jail but it was his child that got on the phone and try to do a prank. Shit happens
Don't buy from naps if you feel better and evreyone shoud do the same and let the guy be around. Is ok this logic?

ppl built way bigger credentials during the years..

anyway, lets pay some respect to our gone but not forgotten brother @BigBaldBeardedGuy and don’t forget this is a thread about fuck @naps
 
Meanwhile if I go and repost a warning message in the naps thread I’ll be banned.
You won't be banned for posting it once in his thread. I disagree with Millard banning BBBG and letting naps stay. However as has been pointed out by Millard you can post the same message over and over in the thread it just can't be the SAME message over and over.

Examples that won't get you banned-
Naps is a scammer don't buy
Fuck scamming naps
Better sources than this cock gobbling selective scammer naps
naps sells trenW30 for injection and scams
Selective scammer
Piece of shit source that selective scams
selective scammer
Takes your money then delivers 1/4 of your order 3 months later and tells you to fuck off when asking for the rest
**Scammer Don't Buy**
Fake reviews with the same counter top DO NOT BUY

That's just 10 examples. Millard flat pout said as long as you don't post the same message twice even using different fonts. Imagine if say 50 of us posted 10 of these messages. That's 500 posts of bad reviews and for every stupid fake shitty review there would be at least 2-3 bad reviews. It would take the most challenged dumbest fucking newb out there to look at that and still think it's a good idea to order.

Basically this is a battle of wills between naps and us. I say show him what were made of and for every fake fucking garbage granite countertop pic with a review there should be at least 1-2 reviews saying fucking scammer or shitty source. I will go start it now.
 
REally? That is your solution for holding sources accountable. Organized spamming?
If that's what naps wants to do then don't we have the right to do the same? I have no issue with a source asking customers to post pics of orders (albeit I think it's stupid but I get it). When a source is taking reviews from his site and posting hundreds of them with no real value it's one big spam thread. It serves no purpose because the reviews aren't the actual customer posting them. I would probably even be okay if it were the actual customers posting them but when he takes a script and floods the thread with the same crap all the time that adds no value whatsoever then all is fair.

I get where your coming from enforcing the rules.

EDIT:
I see the value in people posting that they received a pack from a source to determine packaging, T/A and diligence in actual package but from actual customers not the source itself.
 
Back
Top