Is it justifiable to withhold treatment for hepatitis C [ASIH] from illicit-drug users?
Ethical guidelines suggest that physicians offer treatment to persons who might benefit from it, take steps to improve the likelihood of a benefit, base treatment decisions on only those characteristics of patients that are clinically relevant, and respect the patient's informed decision to accept or decline treatment.
It may be difficult to make predictions about adherence in individual patients, but such assessments are likely to be more accurate, and more ethical, than the assumption that therapy is futile in all patients who use illicit drugs. Individualizing treatment decisions is standard medical practice in situations in which characteristics of the patient substantially influence the balance between risks and benefits.
Drug users, however, often need medical treatment. Moreover, they can be engaged in efforts to address their health care needs. Successful programs invariably adopt a respectful approach to drug users, understand the medical and behavioral sequelae of drug use, and refrain from making moralistic judgments.
The use of anabolic steroids, whether licit or illicit, has become highly politicized, thereby engendering a doctrinaire treatment regimen in response to medical conditions that arise out of such use: therapeutic treatment should be withheld, in view of “watchful waiting.”
Edlin BR, Seal KH, Lorvick J, et al. Is it justifiable to withhold treatment for hepatitis C from illicit-drug users? N Engl J Med 2001;345(3):211-5. MMS: Error / IS IT JUSTIFIABLE TO WITHHOLD TREATMENT FOR HEPATITIS C FROM ILLICIT-DRUG USERS?
Ethical guidelines suggest that physicians offer treatment to persons who might benefit from it, take steps to improve the likelihood of a benefit, base treatment decisions on only those characteristics of patients that are clinically relevant, and respect the patient's informed decision to accept or decline treatment.
It may be difficult to make predictions about adherence in individual patients, but such assessments are likely to be more accurate, and more ethical, than the assumption that therapy is futile in all patients who use illicit drugs. Individualizing treatment decisions is standard medical practice in situations in which characteristics of the patient substantially influence the balance between risks and benefits.
Drug users, however, often need medical treatment. Moreover, they can be engaged in efforts to address their health care needs. Successful programs invariably adopt a respectful approach to drug users, understand the medical and behavioral sequelae of drug use, and refrain from making moralistic judgments.
The use of anabolic steroids, whether licit or illicit, has become highly politicized, thereby engendering a doctrinaire treatment regimen in response to medical conditions that arise out of such use: therapeutic treatment should be withheld, in view of “watchful waiting.”
Edlin BR, Seal KH, Lorvick J, et al. Is it justifiable to withhold treatment for hepatitis C from illicit-drug users? N Engl J Med 2001;345(3):211-5. MMS: Error / IS IT JUSTIFIABLE TO WITHHOLD TREATMENT FOR HEPATITIS C FROM ILLICIT-DRUG USERS?