Thats funny, you guys have yet to come up with an explanation for what happened to the package that mands sent that makes sense. You are simply going by the fact that the package was returned with the same contents, but ignoring Janos explanation. That would be fine if you could come up with an alternate explanation of what you think transpired but you have yet to do that. Was the package seized? If so, why would they return a seized package and why does the tracking say refused and returned to sender. If it was refused and returned to sended than why would Jano say it was seized to both mands and I and then say he got it and tested it, when he knows its going back to a legit address. In addition why would he refuse the package; whats his benefit? You say he is a scammer; how much money did he actually scam? Mands didn't pay a dime, has his GH back, and Jano didn't make a penny. So its kind of hard to defend allegations that are lacking in substance. Jano said he will post the lab report later and that he doesn't have the raw data saved. What more do you want from him as proof? Why don't you first provide and actual story of what you think happened that makes sense before you try and throw someones business under the bus.