Karius - ALP / BAL Lists -

Yea I looked over their site and here's what is missing for "research lab"
1) an address
2) a phone number
3) a COUNTRY
4) any PIs (principal investigators contact info)
5) DEA institutional number
6)) DHHS lab certificate number
7) No listing of a laboratory certifying agency such as NIST (establishes many existing lab testing standards), CILA (required in ALL 50 states), ACLASS (determines calibration and proficiency criteria on an international basis)
8) NO real time analytical data such as MS, HPLC (I saw ONE digitized GS/MS)
9) Some lame synopsis of test results statistics WO ANY analytical data supporting said results
10) Limited ability to report data as a concentration (A relative ratio is used instead yet no conversion factor is provided)
11) Inability to reliably detect substances with similar MW such as LSD, (NOT in a DEA registered research lab)

Yep this is a "lab" alright an UGL, :)
Finally how presumptuous and ignorant of you to assume "no one on Meso" would understand or be able to interpret analytical raw data. See GM that's what happens when a board like TID refuses to appreciate "cut and paste" evidence based info, you don't learn shit and the board morphs into meaningless chit chat.

So speak for yourself when making comments such as the educational level on Meso bc this is an evidence based forum where MS and HPLCs are posted. Consequently several of the folk here are able to interpret this data quite well, and many more have a basic understanding, and capture it's meaning much better than those living in caves.

FINALLY ANYONE SENDING MONEY TO THIS LAB, FOR TESTING, IS WASTING THEIR MONEY AND LIKELY LINING THE POCKETS OF SOMEONE FAR AWAY WHERE RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR FALSE ADVERTISING DON'T APPLY!
DDL is an accredited, DEA-licensed laboratory. I don't think its credibility is the issue. The only criticism is that it doesn't release quantitative data with specific milligrams per milliliter/tablet (or raw data). DDL cites an unwritten administrative rule that prohibits USA-based labs from releasing such data due to the possibility that it provides quality control services for illegal underground labs and dealers.

The Ecstasydata.org/DDL arrangement was the original model that we had hoped to follow for a MESO-Rx sponsored steroid testing & harm reduction program. Of course, MESO wanted to publish detailed quantitative data and raw data too.

Interestingly, MESO contacted DDL about steroid testing for a AAS harm reduction program; a representative point blank said that the lab did not perform AAS analysis. So, I find it ironic that DDL continues performing quality control services for @KariusM while refusing to perform harm reduction services for MESO-Rx.
 
Whom is DDL is Ectasydata a unlisted subsidiary?

With deference how do you know its an accredited analytical lab especially based on the info provided on their website. I mean NOTHING from their website even remotely suggests they are accredited let alone DEA registered to analyze schedule I substances.

Now your saying they declined to perform an AAS analysis? What!

PERHAPS YOUR CORRECT MILLARD, BUT SOMETHING IS VERY MUCH WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE, IMO

I'd love for them to send you or me one of these certificates, bc that's the only proof I need and believe is appropriate to support what is either clearly implied or outright stated on their website.

Regs
JIM
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Whom is DDL is Ectasydata a unlisted subsidiary?

How do you know its an accredited analytical lab especially based on the info provided on their website. I mean NOTHING from their website even remotely suggests they are accredited let alone DEA registered to analyze schedule I substances.

Now your saying they declined to perform an AAS analysis? What!

PERHAPS YOUR CORRECT MILLARD, BUT SOMETHING IS VERY MUCH WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE, IMO

I'd love for them to send you or me one of these certificates, bc that's the only proof I need and believe is appropriate to support what is either clearly implied or outright stated on their website.

Regs
JIM


Ecstacydata.org is just a middleman as far as the actual testing goes. They collect the samples and commission their tests from Drug Detection Lab (DDL) in Sacramento. http://www.drugdetection.net/
 
DDL cites an unwritten administrative rule that prohibits USA-based labs from releasing such data due to the possibility that it provides quality control services for illegal underground labs and dealers.

.

Oh hogwash that's THEIR administrative rule Millard bc I've worked with four to five labs, all DEA registered, and listing a concentration or purity was NEVER an issue.
 
Oh hogwash that's THEIR administrative rule Millard bc I've worked with four to five labs, all DEA registered, and listing a concentration or purity was NEVER an issue.
I wouldn't be so sure. After SRCS, I don't think there is any accredited, US lab that will publicly release such information on AAS as a public service on an ongoing basis.
 
Whom is DDL is Ectasydata a unlisted subsidiary?

With deference how do you know its an accredited analytical lab especially based on the info provided on their website. I mean NOTHING from their website even remotely suggests they are accredited let alone DEA registered to analyze schedule I substances.

Now your saying they declined to perform an AAS analysis? What!

PERHAPS YOUR CORRECT MILLARD, BUT SOMETHING IS VERY MUCH WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE, IMO

I'd love for them to send you or me one of these certificates, bc that's the only proof I need and believe is appropriate to support what is either clearly implied or outright stated on their website.

Regs
JIM
DDL is listed as the licensed lab performing the testing on each test report i.e. "tested by".

For example: http://www.ecstasydata.org/view.php?id=3193
 
I'll look at it a bit closer in the AM but just by glancing at the DDL website the Ecatasydata.com site is VERY mis leading bc it's pretty obvious to me DDL is primarily involved with DRUG SCREENING with quantification being limited to blood alcohol where "intoxication" correlates with a particular blood level and also has legal implications.

What medical condition can be QUANTIFIED by measuring a particular PED level? None that I know of, bc their are no established standards to determine use vs abuse.

Chances are they do NOT have a SCHEDULE I DEA REGISTRATION which limits their ability considerably to "RULING OUT" the presence of an illicit drug. And that's when they use MS and or HPLC.

So some fella was "caught" in the TOUR DE-FRANCE seriously, and say has a POSITIVE DRUG TEST for meth! DDL would then analyze his URINE for amphetamine metabolites, if NONE are detected by MS or HPLC then their job is completed.

So it makes sense they don't and probably are not legally permitted to quantify AAS or any other scheduled substance bc remember they are performing a screening evaluation.

Nope this site is great if you want to know IF you have AAS metabolites, or parent compound, present in your urine or blood respectively but no more from what I see.

So ok it's not pure bunk but close for PED analysis IMO
 
Last edited:
Oh hogwash that's THEIR administrative rule Millard bc I've worked with four to five labs, all DEA registered, and listing a concentration or purity was NEVER an issue.


I wouldn't be so sure. After SRCS, I don't think there is any accredited, US lab that will publicly release such information on AAS as a public service on an ongoing basis.


I tend to think it's BS. The unwritten rule Ecstacydata.org/DDL cite for not releasing quantitative data doesn't make any legal sense. An "unwritten rule" is a rule that doesn't exist - at least as far as the law and courts are concerned. It's seems far more likely that the DEA strongly urged DDL to withhold quantitative data and DDL complied, citing an unwritten rule as their reason.
 
I tend to think it's BS. The unwritten rule Ecstacydata.org/DDL cited for not releasing quantitative data doesn't make any legal sense. An "unwritten rule" is a rule that doesn't exist - at least as far as the law and courts are concerned. It's seems far more likely that the DEA strongly urged DDL to withhold quantitative data and DDL complied, citing an unwritten rule as their reason.
You are probably right. For DDL to say they caved into pressure from the DEA doesn't sound as good as saying they complied with an unwritten, administrative DEA rule. All the DEA needed to say was 'look what we did to SRCS' and hold the CS permit as a carrot.
 
Now there may be state rules or regulations which limit such activity but again that issue has NEVER been raised as a limiting factor with me.

Are there biases sure but we are talking money and a lot of it for testing PEDs.

I suspect any labs OVERT concern would be for them to exercise due diligence and ensure they are not contributing (define that as you wish) to the delinquency of the lay public.

So in that regard one needs to use a little tact in describing your intentions with testing.

Such as I'm screening these AAS to show BB what junk they are buying vs suggesting which UGLs are GTG!
 
Last edited:
I strongly believe DDL DEA registration is more limiting as what appears to be a screening lab but will check tomorrow.
 
Shit that goes down in this life has nothing to do with "deserve". With all due respect, be quiet. I'm on this fucking issue and don't need anyone but iM posting. Yes, I'm hijacking this thread and if necessary the entire fucking board. Only Millard can change shit up at this point. I am that fucking important.
Hey Ben- Mr. Italian muscle is too scared to respond to you, but the little fuck boy is starting the chomo shit in the pep thread now. Fitting place for him- but he somehow figures that me calling pep a pedophile after he threatened to rape and kill my two year old daughter is the same thing as him calling me a pedophile....

It is cute how scared he is of you bb69... very cute.
 
Hey Ben- Mr. Italian muscle is too scared to respond to you, but the little fuck boy is starting the chomo shit in the pep thread now. Fitting place for him- but he somehow figures that me calling pep a pedophile after he threatened to rape and kill my two year old daughter is the same thing as him calling me a pedophile....

It is cute how scared he is of you bb69... very cute.

Funny, how you run from thread to thread asking for bigben to step in.. He doesnt run this place and neither do you.. Again, this has nothing to do with ben..
 
Funny, how you run from thread to thread asking for bigben to step in.. He doesnt run this place and neither do you.. Again, this has nothing to do with ben..
Funny how you run from board to board spewing this nonsense... and I get pm after pm from people who say you have been and always be a big mouth loser everywhere you go.

Kiss your wife for me- hopefully it doesn't rip your face off... 95% straight is good for her teeth. Kinda like you at a rave- 95% straight unless you see an especially tasty cock.
 
Funny how you run from board to board spewing this nonsense... and I get pm after pm from people who say you have been and always be a big mouth loser everywhere you go.

Kiss your wife for me- hopefully it doesn't rip your face off... 95% straight is good for her teeth. Kinda like you at a rave- 95% straight unless you see an especially tasty cock.

You're a real man arent ya..too bad you dont have the balls to say anything like that to me in person.
 
Back
Top