[Legend Pharmacueticals] [Anavar] - [Mass Spec] - [2014-09] [Angus]

[monsterberry1]

Angus test results are not g2g whatsoever its impossible to get 100% purity. Really need to chime in on this angus as this is looking fake as fuck no offence. The rc tren at 74% looked about right but legends anavar at 100% putting the impossible to one side chinese gear is NEVER going to test out anything like that.

I would be surprised if legends anavar was over 25% pure.

 

[demonxp]

But Forrest isn't exactly a spokesperson for Legend either, stating their Sustanon was severely underdosed, which is exactly what I have found out to be true with their gear as well. Hoping to make a switch to Astro ' s gear and rescue my cycle.

 

[johnnyBALLZ]

But Forrest isn't exactly a spokesperson for Legend either, stating their Sustanon was severely underdosed, which is exactly what I have found out to be true with their gear as well. Hoping to make a switch to Astro ' s gear and rescue my cycle.

No Forest certainly isn't but I still give him credit for paying for and posting his results even though they're questionable as hell..

 

[Dr JIM]

i really just want Dr Jim to get this stuff and get me the actual results.

CF
I've PMed you twice mate, yet have not received a reply?

Is your "PM ON", if that's possible? Try PMing me maybe that will work.

Unless you are no longer interested and if that's the case I certainly understand and will leave it at that!
Regs
JIM

 

[mercury]

Have u any idea how reliable LabMax is at determining purity of a sample?
!

I have been playing around with labmax for a long to find out that it is really reliable test. They did tests on pharma grade and they explain if you drop small amount close to the threshold and have good colors then you have good sample.

I have just pre screened some gear with labmax because I do not want to test plain oil or bunk gear on GC/MS and now I wonder if there is any sense to pay $150 for GC/MS.

 

[Capt Forest]

CF
I've PMed you twice mate, yet have not received a reply?

Is your "PM ON", if that's possible? Try PMing me maybe that will work.

Unless you are no longer interested and if that's the case I certainly understand and will leave it at that!
Regs
JIM

hey pm sent.

 

[Burrr]

Forrest, is the legend anavar lab report you posted exactly as you received it?

The purity result in the bottom left is different font. different style compared to the results for the RC tren you posted. It would suggest it's been changed.

 

[Dr JIM]

hey pm sent.

Got it mate

 

[mercury]

The purity result in the bottom left is different font. different style compared to the results for the RC tren you posted. It would suggest it's been changed.

I do not trust any tests posted most of the are faked. I got powder from China the guy included reports that they were 98% pure after having them tested in accredited lab the purity was below 50%

I told the idiot about this and he again sent me another offer (list) with more test results claiming to be 98% and telling me to find next time good lab to od testing.

Just idiot.

 

[Capt Forest]

I will forward the email Angus sent me to anyone that wants to analyze it

Also dr jim i am not sure if i am getting your pms.

 

[Burrr]

Capt, after further discussion I am sure you did not doctor this report. I have been told that the lab is working on a more complete test method that will be appropriate for the substances we routinely test. The purity is almost certainly not 100%, but the testing method currently used is not complete. I expect that they will soon get things dialed in.

 

[monsterberry1]

Capt, after further discussion I am sure you did not doctor this report. I have been told that the lab is working on a more complete test method that will be appropriate for the substances we routinely test. The purity is almost certainly not 100%, but the testing method currently used is not complete. I expect that they will soon get things dialed in.

You made a very good point mate. If the font was different than on the previous tests then its definitely been done by someone and if its not capt then angus has used a different style?

Doesn't sound very professional.

 

[Capt Forest]

Thats great news, i am glad i can earn my credablity back. I have some info from Angus i will post when i am at my computer. It should clear more up.

 

[Dr JIM]

You made a very good point mate. If the font was different than on the previous tests then its definitely been done by someone and if its not capt then angus has used a different style?

Doesn't sound very professional.

Wait so a lab is posting incomplete and obviously inaccurate results without informing it's customers much more reliable analyses should be available in the very near future! WTF!

 

[biggerben69]

I like the tests where there are human beings involved and testing focuses on how situations are addressed and resolved. Sales/customer reps for labs/men that financially back and profit from sales of gear don't have an admirable job and unless they are unknown risk any reputation they have or may have in the future.
They also walk in what for some is know as a "grey" area where conspiracy indictments loom and at times are jammed up their asses and future employment opportunities narrowed down to employers that don't run back round checks and which tend to be in the same area of risky businesses.
I've got a few people that just pulled up and gotta run but my experience with this group began about a year or so ago and ended with what I hoped was an implosion of whatever structure was paid for with the money of guys that did their part in what they hoped was going to be a fair exchange of goods for untaxed income and Anton lived long enough to consider his position courtesy of karma and her sadistic sisters.

 

[Dr JIM]

However that's not what is worrisome at all since these devices (MS and Chromatography) typically have different type sets bc the numeric distribution, collation must accommodate the varied graphs required for interpretation.

No so what is the problem? The MASS SPEC simply does not "fit" the 100% HPLC purity result. That's even considering the algorithmic possibility of an Oxygen adducts, Polycyclic testosterone based Aggregates, Dimers or Isotopes

The bottom line, even when the adducts, aggregates, monomers or dimers are accounted for the MS fragmentation pattern is not at all consistent with a purity of 100%

So what is it's purity?

Really there is no way to make that determination without repeating the HPLC. The test should include at least two dilutions (usually a 0.25% and 1.25) to detect any optical variance which may have accounted for some of the discrepancies.

However the MS may also need to be repeated bc the MW of MANY contaminant AAS can skew HPLC purity data remarkably. (For example substituting a AAS molecular

Those are my suggestions Capt
jim

 

[Dr JIM]

Thats great news, i am glad i can earn my credablity back. It should clear more up.

Although A don't know you well at all, your credibility was never an issue IMO!

 

[Capt Forest]

Alright, here are some pms about the situation between Angus and myself. they are screen shots from my eroids inbox.

It helps explain what happened and that this test is not accurate.
although the tren e test is gtg
I will also be posting this in my log.

 

[Dr JIM]

Unless A has given you written permission I will not comment.

Regs
Jim

 

[Capt Forest]

Unless A have given you written permission I will not comment.

Jim

you can see that he dose in the last few messages.